Kraemer

Kraemer — CS2 Stats

76561197978214969[U:1:17949241]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,216Tracked matches50%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,457Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,635Top 5% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3446 of 253046 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,543 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,635 +1,216 2 Sept – 5 Oct · 6 days played
26,41927,635peak 27,6352 Sept5 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,543 +0 2 Sept – 5 Sept · 2 observations
1,5431,543peak 1,5432 Sept5 Sept
27,635Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,543Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,543
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 208 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 27,635
  • +1,216 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,365 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,654), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate70.9%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy1.7%13.2%13.7%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio2.781.071.09above
Match win rate47.1%46.9%48.4%1.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKraemerFACEITLevel 9 · 1,543 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER27,635 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,543csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning55
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–42–9Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +5.5pp headshot accuracy · −54ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.5
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time593ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 593ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%−4.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 14 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · nuke, 14 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · nuke, 14 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B4923–2647%0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.01
cacheB84–450%-0.02
infernoS64–267%0.01
ancientD62–433%-0.00
nukeB63–350%-0.01
trainC52–340%0.02
anubis—43–175%0.03
vertigo—11–0100%0.04
overpass—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

208,022Lifetime kills
2.78K/D · Top 1% of Level 9 players
4,056Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
70.9%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 9 players
1.7%Shot accuracy
7,853MVPs
1,457Hours (in match)
4,101Bombs planted
2,066Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47160,879
MP92,353
AWP2,224
MAC-101,444
FAMAS1,339

Lifetime map wins

6,317dust2
4,535inferno
4,018nuke
2,606vertigo
1,233train
378office
110cbble
79italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

204Matches
57%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.7ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6167%1.1414.2
Dust23060%1.0615.9
Inferno2948%1.0615.1
Nuke2959%1.2916.3
Ancient1753%0.9514.5
Anubis1650%0.9414.6
Cache1040%0.7611.8
Overpass757%0.9113.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
76.8%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.5%T opening success
57.2%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
15.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.5155% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–100.0426%17 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0111%17 Oct →
dust213–60.1027%17 Oct →
mirage10–130.0323%16 Oct →
dust216–190.0314%15 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0324%15 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0025%14 Oct →
vertigo13–100.0422%14 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0227%14 Oct →
anubis13–10.1124%14 Oct →
dust213–70.0821%14 Oct →
cache11–130.0419%13 Oct →
train11–00.0622%13 Oct →
inferno5–130.0112%13 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0613%12 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0018%12 Oct →
dust29–130.0519%12 Oct →
dust213–40.0614%12 Oct →
cache7–130.0111%12 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0418%11 Oct →
dust29–130.0610%10 Oct →
train11–13-0.035%10 Oct →
dust213–50.1020%10 Oct →
train9–13-0.0315%9 Oct →
mirage9–130.0117%9 Oct →
dust26–130.0223%9 Oct →
dust29–10.0112%6 Oct →
dust28–130.0113%6 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0313%5 Oct →
dust212–120.0110%5 Oct →
nuke13–70.0413%5 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0813%4 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0213%4 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0415%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0117%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0623%3 Oct →
inferno16–130.0219%2 Oct →
cache13–10-0.035%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0217%1 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0125%1 Oct →
mirage12–120.0120%1 Oct →
inferno9–130.0221%1 Oct →
cache16–130.0415%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0316%30 Sept →
dust213–80.0427%30 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0227%30 Sept →
train10–130.0824%30 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0322%30 Sept →
dust22–80.0129%30 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0515%29 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0119%29 Sept →
dust213–80.0313%29 Sept →
dust213–70.1011%28 Sept →
dust25–130.0219%28 Sept →
dust211–130.0423%28 Sept →
dust28–130.0323%28 Sept →
dust212–120.0519%28 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0320%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0420%22 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0313%22 Sept →
ancient16–140.008%20 Sept →
nuke13–70.0210%20 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0216%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0019%19 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0613%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0528%19 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0523%19 Sept →
dust212–120.0915%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0318%19 Sept →
dust213–40.0320%19 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0521%18 Sept →
anubis13–50.0417%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.0527%18 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0616%18 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0228%18 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0423%18 Sept →
ancient13–80.0824%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0216%17 Sept →
overpass13–90.0532%17 Sept →
dust213–50.1021%17 Sept →
dust213–70.0110%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0414%16 Sept →
dust212–120.0140%16 Sept →
dust213–10.0925%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0428%16 Sept →
dust213–90.0120%15 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.028%15 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0120%15 Sept →
dust24–130.0429%14 Sept →
dust213–00.1114%14 Sept →
train13–90.0530%14 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.049%14 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0650%14 Sept →
dust213–80.0118%13 Sept →
dust213–30.0821%13 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0733%13 Sept →
ancient7–130.0128%13 Sept →
dust213–40.0318%13 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0414%13 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0618%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.