MALPHEK

MALPHEK — CS2 Stats

PL76561197975440838[U:1:15175110]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,679Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
7,592Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,384Top 25% of 201,122 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#37345 of 247938 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,032 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,384 +1,966 21 Jul – 1 Oct · 29 days played
21,41824,999peak 24,99921 Jul1 Oct
24,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,032Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
39Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,032
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 468 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,615 below peak (24,999)
  • -901 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,616 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches40——
Win rate50%——
K/D0.78——
Headshot %65%——

Measured 2 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,762), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate58.4%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy13.5%13.0%13.3%meets
Kill/death ratio1.161.061.07above
Match win rate41.7%46.3%46.9%5.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMALPHEKFACEITLevel 8 · 2,032 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,384 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,032csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateTWWWLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.9
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 62% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time517ms−48ms
first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 517ms
Headshot accuracy19.0%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 28 Aug →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · dust2, 3 Sept →
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 30 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 28 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
11–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 72% over 18infernoWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC229–1341%0.02
ancientB2110–1148%0.03
nukeS1813–572%0.05
dust2S1711–665%-0.00
anubisA127–558%0.02
infernoC83–538%0.03
cache—22–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

369,857Lifetime kills
1.16K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
11,756Matches
41.7%Match win rate
58.4%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 8 players
13.5%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
26,773MVPs
8,656Hours (in match)
12,768Bombs planted
2,962Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47148,313
AWP41,462
P2506,391
FAMAS5,711
Tec-94,697
SSG 084,617

Lifetime map wins

19,852dust2
13,835inferno
11,646nuke
3,193train
1,960cbble
1,370vertigo
299office
276dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,725Matches
49%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
79.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25352%1.1215.8
Ancient20046%1.1916.6
Anubis13949%1.0615.6
Inferno13739%1.1516.1
Dust211540%1.1015.8
Nuke10656%1.2417.1
Vertigo1937%0.9814.5
Overpass1958%1.3117.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
40.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.6%Spray accuracy
79.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
513msReaction time
37.7%T opening success
61.5%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
6.84HE damage / grenade
10.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6556% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–150.0515%1 Oct →
mirage16–130.0516%29 Sept →
anubis13–50.0416%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.0917%29 Sept →
inferno14–160.045%28 Sept →
ancient13–30.1124%28 Sept →
anubis13–30.0916%28 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0414%28 Sept →
mirage11–130.0123%18 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0024%18 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0214%10 Sept →
dust22–13-0.080%9 Sept →
ancient5–130.1023%8 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
dust216–14-0.068%8 Sept →
ancient13–60.0027%8 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0111%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0414%7 Sept →
inferno13–160.0528%7 Sept →
ancient10–130.0230%7 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0323%7 Sept →
ancient6–130.0124%7 Sept →
dust213–90.0215%7 Sept →
dust216–140.0314%7 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0319%6 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0218%6 Sept →
mirage4–130.0019%6 Sept →
cache13–30.0629%6 Sept →
ancient9–130.0023%5 Sept →
dust213–40.0233%5 Sept →
anubis10–130.0317%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.018%4 Sept →
dust213–10.0639%3 Sept →
mirage11–130.0121%2 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0024%1 Sept →
dust213–2-0.0718%1 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0116%31 Aug →
nuke13–100.0328%31 Aug →
ancient8–130.0519%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0530%30 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0021%30 Aug →
ancient6–130.0333%30 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.0126%29 Aug →
nuke13–80.0518%29 Aug →
ancient13–70.0317%29 Aug →
anubis8–130.0526%29 Aug →
nuke13–30.1823%28 Aug →
ancient13–110.0423%28 Aug →
mirage13–50.0724%28 Aug →
anubis10–130.0219%28 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0112%28 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0330%28 Aug →
ancient13–60.0928%28 Aug →
dust213–00.0937%28 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0020%28 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0322%28 Aug →
inferno15–150.0629%27 Aug →
ancient6–130.0221%27 Aug →
nuke13–20.0224%27 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0219%27 Aug →
inferno13–3-0.013%27 Aug →
anubis13–30.0716%27 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0119%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0013%26 Aug →
dust210–130.0125%26 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0619%26 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0021%25 Aug →
mirage7–130.0022%25 Aug →
ancient10–130.0424%25 Aug →
mirage14–160.0221%24 Aug →
mirage13–110.0318%24 Aug →
anubis13–80.0119%24 Aug →
nuke16–130.0715%23 Aug →
mirage8–130.0823%23 Aug →
dust213–20.0420%23 Aug →
mirage13–60.0328%21 Aug →
nuke13–60.0228%14 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0211%12 Aug →
dust214–16-0.0414%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0028%7 Aug →
mirage13–110.0519%6 Aug →
nuke11–130.0727%6 Aug →
nuke13–110.0822%6 Aug →
mirage10–130.0817%5 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0116%5 Aug →
nuke13–110.0022%5 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0020%4 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.009%4 Aug →
nuke13–20.1120%3 Aug →
ancient13–90.0119%3 Aug →
dust27–130.0024%1 Aug →
nuke9–130.019%27 Jul →
mirage12–10.0413%26 Jul →
ancient16–190.0322%24 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0113%24 Jul →
nuke13–10.1017%24 Jul →
nuke13–10.1123%23 Jul →
inferno13–60.0318%22 Jul →
ancient13–110.0216%21 Jul →
mirage5–130.0212%21 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.