fours ☠️🖤 — CS2 Stats

DE76561197975368853[U:1:15103125]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

363Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,332Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,660), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	41.8%	44.0%	44.7%	3.0% short
Shot accuracy	17.4%	11.6%	11.9%	above
Kill/death ratio	0.99	1.03	1.04	0.05 short
Match win rate	45.9%	45.1%	45.2%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75

Positioning49

Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49–41–10Last 10049%Win rateLLTTWTLTTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.5

Aggression7.5

Utility3.7

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 581ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5

Positioning4.9

Utility3.7

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels2.9

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time587ms−13ms

first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms

Headshot accuracy23.8%+4.2%

first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — cache 8–13

13–1Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

10–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

34Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 83% over 6vertigoWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	25	13–12	52%	-0.01
nuke	C	20	7–13	35%	-0.02
inferno	B	16	8–8	50%	-0.01
cache	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
dust2	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.00
ancient	S	6	5–1	83%	0.03
overpass	S	5	4–1	80%	-0.01
vertigo	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.03
anubis	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
train	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.04
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

136,929Lifetime kills

0.99K/D

7,093Matches

45.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players

41.8%Headshot %

17.4%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 5 players

19,745MVPs

3,080Hours (in match)

4,403Bombs planted

2,495Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,900

AWP28,039

M4A4 / M4A1-S17,043

Desert Eagle8,473

P2000 / USP-S8,458

Glock-184,205

Knife3,532

P2503,049

FAMAS2,770

SG 5532,227

Lifetime map wins

22,472dust2

8,499inferno

5,520train

2,885nuke

2,787cbble

1,219vertigo

551lake

516safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,297Matches

50%Win rate

1.03Avg K/D

85.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	100%	1.76	17.7
Inferno	2	0%	0.74	12.5
Dust2	1	0%	0.63	12.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.56	14.0
Ancient	1	0%	1.13	17.0
Train	1	0%	0.85	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy

32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.1%Spray accuracy

81.5%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

581msReaction time

27.6%T opening success

53.2%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

2.7%Flash assists

5.42HE damage / grenade

4.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 27.5718% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	2–13	-0.06	55%	28 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.02	36%	28 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	23%	21 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	32%	15 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.03	34%	15 Aug →
cache	15–15	0.07	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	19%	9 Jun →
anubis	12–12	-0.02	26%	27 May →
nuke	15–15	0.00	12%	26 May →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	17%	26 May →
train	3–13	-0.09	19%	24 May →
cache	13–11	-0.02	47%	24 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	17%	19 May →
inferno	13–16	-0.04	7%	16 May →
ancient	10–13	0.00	20%	16 May →
cache	13–10	-0.01	26%	8 May →
cache	8–13	0.13	19%	8 May →
cache	13–5	-0.01	43%	7 May →
nuke	9–13	-0.06	15%	25 Apr →
anubis	9–13	0.00	30%	22 Apr →
overpass	9–13	-0.05	32%	17 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	15%	15 Apr →
overpass	13–11	0.00	21%	10 Apr →
nuke	13–11	-0.05	15%	10 Apr →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	17%	10 Apr →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	21%	9 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	15%	9 Apr →
nuke	16–12	-0.03	24%	9 Apr →
mirage	13–5	0.07	32%	8 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	14%	6 Apr →
nuke	13–11	0.07	21%	6 Apr →
inferno	13–7	-0.08	11%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	32%	5 Apr →
mirage	13–3	-0.06	27%	5 Apr →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	27%	5 Apr →
nuke	15–15	-0.08	15%	29 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.02	36%	28 Mar →
nuke	12–12	-0.02	32%	25 Mar →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	28%	23 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.00	30%	18 Mar →
anubis	13–8	0.00	26%	18 Mar →
office	7–13	-0.05	31%	18 Mar →
nuke	13–2	-0.09	29%	18 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.01	21%	17 Mar →
nuke	6–13	-0.09	25%	16 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.06	27%	15 Mar →
nuke	9–3	0.10	26%	13 Mar →
nuke	6–13	0.02	20%	5 Mar →
inferno	8–8	0.01	28%	5 Mar →
vertigo	8–13	-0.06	22%	18 Dec →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	28%	18 Dec →
inferno	13–11	0.01	21%	13 Dec →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	42%	13 Dec →
train	13–9	-0.01	29%	26 Oct →
ancient	13–3	0.02	13%	26 Oct →
mirage	13–1	0.00	10%	9 Apr →
overpass	13–5	-0.02	19%	9 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.04	32%	9 Apr →
train	13–3	-0.03	30%	8 Feb →
dust2	7–13	0.04	8%	23 Nov →
vertigo	6–9	-0.10	45%	2 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.04	23%	1 Apr →
nuke	0–4	-0.11	0%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.08	20%	5 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.08	21%	5 Mar →
anubis	13–3	0.01	31%	3 Mar →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	32%	3 Mar →
vertigo	13–6	0.03	26%	28 Sept →
overpass	13–2	0.07	23%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.02	26%	8 Sept →
vertigo	15–15	0.02	25%	6 Sept →
inferno	8–16	-0.01	13%	29 Aug →
overpass	19–16	-0.02	18%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.01	11%	18 Jun →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	28%	29 Apr →
mirage	8–8	-0.03	14%	8 Apr →
dust2	9–7	0.09	35%	25 Mar →
mirage	9–4	-0.06	17%	25 Mar →
ancient	16–9	-0.00	7%	11 Feb →
cache	14–16	0.01	22%	3 Feb →
inferno	5–16	-0.01	20%	6 Jun →
dust2	16–19	-0.07	13%	3 Jun →
mirage	19–16	-0.05	22%	6 Feb →
inferno	16–14	-0.04	17%	9 Jan →
mirage	12–16	-0.03	27%	9 Jan →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	13%	4 Jan →
nuke	16–10	0.02	21%	22 Dec →
nuke	13–16	-0.01	23%	15 Dec →
vertigo	10–16	-0.04	21%	11 Dec →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	22%	5 Dec →
inferno	18–22	0.00	19%	4 Dec →
inferno	16–11	0.03	15%	4 Dec →
dust2	19–16	0.05	12%	4 Dec →
mirage	16–9	0.03	26%	4 Dec →
inferno	12–16	0.07	21%	3 Dec →
inferno	25–23	-0.01	14%	1 Dec →
nuke	17–19	-0.04	30%	1 Dec →
ancient	16–4	0.06	14%	14 Nov →
mirage	8–16	-0.02	16%	17 Oct →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	17%	17 Oct →