Phant0m

Phant0m — CS2 Stats

76561198823912164[U:1:863646436]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,800Tracked matches66%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,666Top 25% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36062 of 259892 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,420 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,666 +3,374 31 Aug – 3 Nov · 32 days played
19,60323,698peak 23,69831 Aug3 Nov
23,927Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,420Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,420
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 111 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-21
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-21

Premier CS Rating

  • 32 below peak (23,698)
  • +3,666 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,334 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-21
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPhant0mFACEITLevel 10 · 1,420 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,666 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,420csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning62
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–42–2Last 10056%Win rateWLLWWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +66ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 15–5 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.4
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.2
Utility6.4
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time524ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 510ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 13–0 · mirage, 8 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · cache, 18 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
8–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 86% over 7nukeWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2414–1058%0.04
anubisB178–947%0.02
ancientA159–660%0.02
dust2B136–746%0.04
nukeC125–742%0.05
infernoS75–271%0.02
cacheS76–186%0.06
vertigo—22–0100%0.03
overpass—11–0100%0.02
rush_001—10–10%0.06
train—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

246Matches
56%Win rate
1.41Avg K/D
94.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4562%1.6320.2
Anubis2850%1.4818.3
Nuke2157%1.6320.1
Inferno1850%1.6316.4
Cache1250%1.3218.3
Ancient1267%1.5721.1
Vertigo956%1.6520.2
Dust2771%1.2015.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
41.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
514msReaction time
36.2%T opening success
42.8%CT opening success
0.59Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
8.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.232% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0212%3 Nov →
anubis6–130.0220%3 Nov →
dust211–13-0.0414%2 Nov →
inferno13–80.0117%2 Nov →
cache13–100.0820%27 Oct →
mirage13–60.0823%27 Oct →
nuke13–70.0717%27 Oct →
anubis13–70.0220%20 Oct →
mirage4–130.0132%19 Oct →
ancient13–90.0710%19 Oct →
inferno11–130.0517%18 Oct →
cache13–30.0767%18 Oct →
ancient16–130.1116%18 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0315%13 Oct →
mirage13–80.079%5 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0116%5 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0413%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0425%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.2242%4 Oct →
inferno13–110.0117%4 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0318%4 Oct →
dust27–130.0129%4 Oct →
mirage13–100.0614%2 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0012%2 Oct →
dust213–50.0315%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.009%1 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0314%1 Oct →
ancient13–80.0210%1 Oct →
ancient6–130.0113%1 Oct →
ancient10–130.0513%1 Oct →
dust215–150.0512%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0316%30 Sept →
overpass9–60.0215%30 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.028%30 Sept →
inferno13–90.0525%30 Sept →
rush_0017–80.0633%30 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0417%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0316%28 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0027%28 Sept →
dust213–100.1011%28 Sept →
dust213–60.0310%28 Sept →
anubis13–60.0413%28 Sept →
vertigo9–60.0219%27 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.078%27 Sept →
inferno9–40.0932%27 Sept →
nuke9–60.2314%27 Sept →
ancient16–120.0210%27 Sept →
nuke7–130.0123%27 Sept →
nuke3–130.0110%25 Sept →
dust213–100.1432%25 Sept →
mirage13–110.0012%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0429%23 Sept →
train4–13-0.0217%23 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.026%22 Sept →
mirage13–100.0115%20 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0226%18 Sept →
mirage14–160.0123%18 Sept →
cache13–100.0816%17 Sept →
dust26–130.1033%17 Sept →
ancient13–90.0935%17 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0216%16 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0520%16 Sept →
anubis16–12-0.025%16 Sept →
mirage10–130.0514%15 Sept →
anubis8–130.0216%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.1518%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0320%14 Sept →
ancient13–100.028%14 Sept →
mirage13–50.1519%14 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.028%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.0412%10 Sept →
cache13–100.0512%10 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0420%10 Sept →
ancient13–16-0.0314%8 Sept →
mirage10–130.0615%8 Sept →
mirage13–80.0322%8 Sept →
anubis11–130.0412%8 Sept →
nuke13–100.0428%8 Sept →
cache16–140.0518%8 Sept →
mirage13–00.2631%8 Sept →
nuke7–130.0510%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0827%8 Sept →
ancient10–130.0610%7 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0515%7 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0123%6 Sept →
nuke10–130.0115%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.009%6 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0613%6 Sept →
anubis10–130.0321%5 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0718%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0322%3 Sept →
mirage13–80.0522%2 Sept →
cache13–90.1318%2 Sept →
anubis13–100.1315%1 Sept →
dust213–110.1124%1 Sept →
anubis8–130.0416%1 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0116%1 Sept →
anubis13–110.0416%1 Sept →
anubis13–70.0813%1 Sept →
nuke3–130.0624%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.