jAki-

jAki- — CS2 Stats

FI76561197975227340[U:1:14961612]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,025Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,791Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#46061 of 260004 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,080 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−137Faceit ELO · 2,217 → 2,080

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,791 -287 1 Sept – 1 Nov · 24 days played
22,50224,648peak 24,6481 Sept1 Nov
24,767Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,217Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-09-01

Faceit ELO

  • 137 below peak (2,217)
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 420 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,857 below peak (24,648)
  • -583 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,209 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjAki-FACEITLevel 10 · 2,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,791 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,217csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning51
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–38–5Last 10057%Win rateLLTLLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.3pp headshot accuracy · −77ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.6
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time556ms+2ms
first ⅓ avg 554ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.33Best match rating · 9–1 · poseidon, 19 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · poseidon, 19 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 6–9 · poseidon, 19 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 71% over 14mirageWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
poseidonA3723–1462%0.01
infernoA159–660%0.01
dust2S1410–471%-0.00
ancientA95–456%-0.02
nukeB84–450%-0.02
mirageD70–70%-0.05
anubisS75–271%-0.01
cache—31–233%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,953Matches
52%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
70.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218454%0.9012.9
Ancient16452%0.9814.2
Anubis11551%0.8713.2
Inferno11050%0.9614.0
Nuke9857%1.0213.6
Mirage5641%0.8412.1
Train2264%0.9414.1
Overpass1856%0.9514.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
75.8%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
536msReaction time
52.7%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
7.54HE damage / grenade
17.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.9016% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
poseidon5–9-0.0810%4 Nov →
poseidon6–9-0.1217%2 Nov →
ancient15–15-0.0121%1 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0625%1 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0313%1 Nov →
inferno13–10-0.0324%31 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.054%31 Oct →
ancient13–4-0.0214%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.0418%30 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0015%30 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0312%29 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0723%29 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0814%27 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0714%27 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0323%27 Oct →
inferno13–30.0711%25 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0618%25 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0318%25 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0111%24 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0030%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.129%24 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.039%23 Oct →
dust213–60.044%23 Oct →
dust213–90.0121%23 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0328%22 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0721%22 Oct →
anubis13–50.0316%22 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0411%21 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0523%21 Oct →
poseidon9–5-0.0521%21 Oct →
poseidon9–40.0014%21 Oct →
anubis13–70.0322%18 Oct →
nuke15–19-0.0219%18 Oct →
inferno13–16-0.0332%18 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0910%18 Oct →
poseidon9–10.3026%18 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0112%16 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0119%16 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0312%15 Oct →
inferno13–90.0721%15 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0628%13 Oct →
dust210–130.0519%13 Oct →
dust213–100.0429%13 Oct →
nuke13–20.1619%12 Oct →
poseidon9–2-0.0020%12 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0924%12 Oct →
poseidon9–6-0.075%12 Oct →
inferno3–70.0220%11 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0410%10 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0422%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.039%10 Oct →
poseidon9–5-0.0525%10 Oct →
inferno13–90.0814%9 Oct →
nuke16–19-0.0513%9 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0920%9 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0321%8 Oct →
nuke13–110.0315%8 Oct →
poseidon8–80.0419%7 Oct →
ancient13–90.0214%6 Oct →
dust213–80.0511%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0714%4 Oct →
poseidon9–30.1316%2 Oct →
poseidon9–2-0.0313%2 Oct →
cache13–4-0.0421%1 Oct →
poseidon6–9-0.0329%30 Sept →
ancient11–130.0012%28 Sept →
inferno13–00.0824%27 Sept →
dust213–30.0116%27 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0422%26 Sept →
poseidon7–9-0.099%26 Sept →
poseidon9–2-0.1013%26 Sept →
poseidon9–20.1111%26 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1324%25 Sept →
inferno13–9-0.0414%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0317%23 Sept →
inferno10–10.0623%23 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0322%22 Sept →
poseidon9–5-0.0110%21 Sept →
poseidon9–30.0620%21 Sept →
poseidon9–4-0.1113%21 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0411%20 Sept →
nuke4–9-0.150%20 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.1323%19 Sept →
poseidon9–10.3317%19 Sept →
poseidon0–9-0.210%19 Sept →
poseidon9–20.0638%19 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0624%18 Sept →
poseidon9–40.1717%15 Sept →
poseidon9–70.0821%15 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0636%15 Sept →
anubis19–17-0.0316%11 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0631%11 Sept →
poseidon5–9-0.0426%10 Sept →
poseidon9–4-0.0227%10 Sept →
poseidon8–8-0.0224%10 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0120%8 Sept →
poseidon9–50.0320%8 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0521%8 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0012%7 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0017%7 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.