Brad

Brad — CS2 Stats

GB76561197973768154[U:1:13502426]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

833Tracked matches79%Win rate2023Tracked since
1,649Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,614Purple band · top ~26% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7 · 859 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,614 +2,008 5 Aug – 26 Oct · 43 days played
12,09715,904peak 15,9045 Aug26 Oct
Faceit ELO: 859 +0 30 Aug – 11 Sept · 2 observations
859859peak 85930 Aug11 Sept
15,904Peak Premier in tracked matches
859Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2026-08-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 859
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 290 below peak (15,904)
  • +615 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,008 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,386 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7——
Win rate29%——
K/D0.86——
Headshot %29%——

Measured 22 Oct 2026 → 28 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate39.4%45.7%46.8%7.4% short
Shot accuracy7.4%12.7%13.0%5.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.991.051.060.08 short
Match win rate41.1%45.7%46.3%5.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 8 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBradFACEITLevel 7 · 859 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER15,614 · Purple bandPEAK ELO859csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning68
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–41–3Last 10056%Win rateLWWWWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −47ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 463ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.4
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 64% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning6.8
Utility5.4
Mechanics3.1
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time523ms−38ms
first ⅓ avg 561ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy10.8%−1.4%
first ⅓ avg 12.2% → last ⅓ avg 10.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–5 · inferno, 20 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 7 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 22 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 20 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 20nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2015–575%0.02
mirageA2012–860%-0.01
dust2B158–753%0.01
ancientB147–750%0.01
nukeD113–827%-0.01
cacheC104–640%-0.02
anubisS107–370%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

42,217Lifetime kills
0.99K/D
2,190Matches
41.1%Match win rate
39.4%Headshot %
7.4%Shot accuracy
3,825MVPs
938Hours (in match)
995Bombs planted
540Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,344dust2
3,053inferno
1,615nuke
165vertigo
145train
16cbble
7ar_shoots
4ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

322Matches
50%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
79.3ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8657%1.2716.2
Dust26749%1.0415.3
Inferno4154%1.1715.8
Nuke3936%1.2316.1
Ancient3435%0.9415.1
Anubis2454%1.0315.5
Cache1164%1.0115.9
Overpass862%1.2120.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.2%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.9%Spray accuracy
64.0%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
515msReaction time
61.8%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
8.85HE damage / grenade
8.15Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.1812% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–130.0614%26 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.016%26 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0214%22 Oct →
mirage13–1-0.013%20 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.028%19 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0317%18 Oct →
cache13–90.0213%12 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.1014%10 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0110%8 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0313%7 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.048%4 Oct →
inferno13–60.0211%2 Oct →
inferno13–30.065%1 Oct →
dust213–110.0414%1 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.063%1 Oct →
ancient2–130.0110%30 Sept →
dust210–130.0110%29 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0515%28 Sept →
inferno13–90.0113%28 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.029%27 Sept →
anubis13–30.0912%24 Sept →
nuke13–20.0811%23 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0210%20 Sept →
anubis13–30.087%20 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0018%20 Sept →
ancient19–170.0213%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.008%17 Sept →
inferno13–30.0610%17 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0324%9 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.018%9 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.022%8 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0714%6 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0511%6 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.038%5 Sept →
ancient13–60.027%3 Sept →
mirage13–40.1017%3 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.025%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0315%2 Sept →
ancient13–100.0312%31 Aug →
dust213–50.0415%29 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0221%29 Aug →
anubis12–30.037%29 Aug →
mirage12–120.0921%26 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0011%25 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0210%25 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0320%24 Aug →
dust213–80.0411%23 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0316%23 Aug →
cache14–16-0.028%23 Aug →
ancient13–6-0.002%23 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0413%22 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.034%22 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0612%22 Aug →
inferno13–100.0310%22 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0111%22 Aug →
dust212–160.0111%21 Aug →
anubis13–16-0.045%21 Aug →
nuke4–130.044%21 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.017%20 Aug →
inferno13–50.108%20 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.059%19 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.024%18 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.017%17 Aug →
ancient0–130.0316%17 Aug →
mirage8–130.018%17 Aug →
ancient6–10.0411%17 Aug →
mirage13–60.0514%16 Aug →
nuke11–130.079%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.056%14 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0313%14 Aug →
ancient3–130.018%14 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0511%13 Aug →
inferno13–80.0417%13 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.016%13 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0115%12 Aug →
dust213–160.0215%12 Aug →
inferno11–130.058%12 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.075%11 Aug →
inferno13–110.025%11 Aug →
nuke13–70.0115%11 Aug →
anubis13–110.038%10 Aug →
nuke15–15-0.0311%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0211%9 Aug →
anubis13–160.0326%9 Aug →
dust210–130.026%9 Aug →
mirage16–120.018%9 Aug →
dust213–40.048%9 Aug →
dust211–130.0620%9 Aug →
ancient13–90.0711%8 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0313%8 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.059%8 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0418%8 Aug →
inferno13–60.0914%7 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0733%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0513%6 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0520%6 Aug →
inferno13–90.0413%6 Aug →
ancient9–130.0411%5 Aug →
anubis13–110.037%5 Aug →
inferno10–130.0610%5 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.