SleepyN1ck

SleepyN1ck — CS2 Stats

GL76561197972270143[U:1:12004415]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,654Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,968Hours in CS25Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,468Top 25% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#28892 of 261517 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,056 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Nov 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 24,468 → 24,468
0Faceit ELO · 2,056 → 2,056
+10Tracked matches · now 2,654
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,468 +1,914 4 Sept – 5 Nov · 9 days played
22,55424,468peak 24,4684 Sept5 Nov
Faceit ELO: 2,056 +0 6 Sept – 5 Nov · 3 observations
2,0562,056peak 2,0566 Sept5 Nov
24,468Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,056Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-07-18

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,056
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 444 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,468
  • +461 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 532 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches14——
Win rate86%——
K/D1.15——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 5 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=30,986), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate53.2%50.9%
Shot accuracy7.7%13.7%
Kill/death ratio1.391.09
Match win rate45.7%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSleepyN1ckFACEITLevel 10 · 2,056 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,468 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,056csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning53
Utility81

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–50–1Last 10049%Win rateWWWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.2pp headshot accuracy · −62ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility8.1
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch4.0

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.81 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 81 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 66% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning5.3
Utility8.1
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time535ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 537ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 4 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 19 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 15 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 64% over 25anubisWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2516–964%0.02
infernoB2413–1154%0.01
nukeC188–1044%0.03
mirageA116–555%0.01
dust2C104–640%0.03
anubisD82–625%0.04
cache—40–40%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

135,027Lifetime kills
1.39K/D · Top 10% of Level 10 players
5,485Matches
45.7%Match win rate
53.2%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
7.7%Shot accuracy
17,071MVPs
2,270Hours (in match)
5,594Bombs planted
2,579Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4751,443
AWP8,358
MAC-103,709
MP93,309
Knife2,343

Lifetime map wins

15,433inferno
8,854dust2
4,023nuke
1,000train
918vertigo
405lake
378cbble
257bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,938Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
85.3ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno50761%1.1417.2
Ancient49653%1.0816.8
Nuke25448%1.0516.4
Mirage24541%1.0716.0
Dust213643%1.0215.9
Anubis9944%1.0916.9
Overpass5648%1.0716.8
Vertigo3043%1.0717.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy
38.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.4%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
530msReaction time
66.2%T opening success
35.7%CT opening success
0.81Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
12.86HE damage / grenade
17.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 35.6835% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–10-0.0330%8 Nov →
nuke13–60.0322%8 Nov →
mirage13–110.0518%6 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0313%6 Nov →
nuke13–30.0424%4 Nov →
dust216–140.0316%28 Oct →
dust29–130.0325%22 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0121%20 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0221%18 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0121%18 Oct →
inferno13–160.0722%17 Oct →
inferno14–160.0219%17 Oct →
nuke14–160.0419%17 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0427%17 Oct →
inferno13–110.0118%12 Oct →
ancient4–130.0714%11 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0324%9 Oct →
anubis13–90.0115%7 Oct →
dust28–130.0426%7 Oct →
ancient13–90.0015%7 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0119%5 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0216%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0619%4 Oct →
ancient13–110.0017%4 Oct →
ancient5–130.0221%4 Oct →
mirage10–130.0218%30 Sept →
nuke7–130.0028%30 Sept →
ancient14–16-0.0810%27 Sept →
inferno13–90.0419%27 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0124%27 Sept →
dust23–130.0012%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.0131%26 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0217%22 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0216%20 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0018%19 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0116%19 Sept →
cache14–160.0323%15 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0320%15 Sept →
nuke13–50.0719%15 Sept →
ancient13–10.1619%15 Sept →
dust211–130.0416%14 Sept →
inferno13–30.0113%14 Sept →
ancient13–100.0214%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.0019%13 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0214%12 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0515%10 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0223%9 Sept →
nuke13–80.0317%8 Sept →
ancient13–70.0415%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.2115%4 Sept →
anubis13–60.0916%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0830%4 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0221%1 Sept →
anubis10–130.0714%31 Aug →
cache6–130.0218%31 Aug →
ancient8–130.0020%31 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0320%30 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0128%27 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0335%27 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0126%25 Aug →
inferno13–90.0616%22 Aug →
inferno8–130.1126%20 Aug →
nuke13–60.1420%20 Aug →
anubis3–130.0419%20 Aug →
nuke8–130.0515%19 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0143%19 Aug →
ancient13–70.0424%18 Aug →
ancient13–70.1216%18 Aug →
inferno11–130.0515%18 Aug →
inferno13–50.0921%17 Aug →
dust213–80.0820%16 Aug →
ancient13–10.1530%13 Aug →
anubis9–130.0916%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0416%13 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0438%12 Aug →
ancient13–90.0324%10 Aug →
ancient13–70.0312%10 Aug →
mirage13–70.1424%10 Aug →
nuke3–130.0423%10 Aug →
nuke10–130.0224%9 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0518%9 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0129%7 Aug →
inferno10–130.0532%7 Aug →
inferno11–130.0423%7 Aug →
cache7–130.0123%7 Aug →
nuke9–20.0341%4 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.1022%4 Aug →
ancient13–110.0419%4 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0420%23 Jul →
inferno19–17-0.0329%22 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.0915%22 Jul →
ancient4–130.0416%21 Jul →
mirage7–130.0526%21 Jul →
cache6–130.0225%21 Jul →
anubis15–150.0516%20 Jul →
ancient7–130.0120%20 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0526%19 Jul →
mirage13–50.0024%18 Jul →
inferno13–60.0312%18 Jul →
ancient13–60.0431%18 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.