AnkMupp

AnkMupp — CS2 Stats

SE76561197971275278[U:1:11009550]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,139Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,971Hours in CS43Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,645Top 25% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#47508 of 258027 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1108Premier CS Rating · 21,537 → 22,645

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,645 +2,690 1 Sept – 27 Oct · 31 days played
19,95525,000peak 25,0001 Sept27 Oct
25,115Peak Premier in tracked matches
940Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,355 below peak (25,000)
  • -1,929 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,355 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate38.5%44.8%45.7%7.2% short
Shot accuracy14.2%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.031.05above
Match win rate35.8%45.2%45.7%9.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnkMuppFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,645 · Pink bandPEAK ELO940csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning58
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY32–64–4Last 10032%Win rateWWWLWLWWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.4pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 8–10–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.8
Clutch4.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels5.4
Win Impact1.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time519ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 506ms → last ⅓ avg 519ms
Headshot accuracy18.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 27 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–3 · inferno, 25 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · inferno, 6 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 47% over 19mirageWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB199–1047%0.02
cacheD184–1422%0.04
anubisC166–1038%-0.01
nukeC146–843%0.01
dust2D143–1121%0.01
mirageD101–910%0.01
ancientD93–633%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

215,463Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
9,940Matches
35.8%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 6 players
18,139MVPs
4,016Hours (in match)
13,161Bombs planted
2,129Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

19,106inferno
7,754nuke
7,052dust2
2,650vertigo
1,848cbble
1,083train
166office
59dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

150Matches
56%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
90.5ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno2972%1.4418.4
Ancient2075%1.5817.6
Anubis1450%1.1916.7
Nuke1145%1.7218.8
Overpass757%1.2317.4
Dust2650%1.1819.3
Cache633%0.9815.2
Mirage333%0.9812.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
83.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
525msReaction time
55.9%T opening success
47.0%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
11.21HE damage / grenade
9.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.491 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–110.0214%27 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0219%27 Oct →
cache13–20.1817%27 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0528%26 Oct →
inferno13–70.0519%26 Oct →
cache9–130.0324%25 Oct →
inferno7–3-0.0333%25 Oct →
dust213–50.0123%25 Oct →
nuke6–130.0118%24 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0315%24 Oct →
cache5–130.0024%24 Oct →
inferno13–60.0419%24 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0124%24 Oct →
mirage4–130.0417%24 Oct →
mirage3–130.0316%23 Oct →
anubis5–130.0219%23 Oct →
cache15–150.1113%23 Oct →
nuke5–130.1018%23 Oct →
cache5–130.1113%22 Oct →
inferno13–110.0431%22 Oct →
mirage5–130.0617%22 Oct →
cache8–130.0420%22 Oct →
ancient6–130.0115%21 Oct →
inferno13–80.1214%21 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.018%21 Oct →
cache4–130.0021%20 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0112%20 Oct →
nuke13–60.1217%19 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0011%19 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0222%19 Oct →
ancient13–100.0612%18 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0322%18 Oct →
inferno13–40.1116%18 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0027%18 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0919%17 Oct →
anubis13–30.0918%17 Oct →
anubis9–130.0415%17 Oct →
cache9–130.1013%17 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0216%17 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0125%17 Oct →
dust210–130.0221%17 Oct →
nuke8–130.0113%16 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0321%16 Oct →
dust213–40.0718%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0818%16 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0621%16 Oct →
anubis13–16-0.0418%16 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.062%15 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0214%15 Oct →
ancient13–80.0816%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0123%15 Oct →
dust22–13-0.0015%14 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0110%14 Oct →
inferno7–130.0021%14 Oct →
cache13–50.0717%14 Oct →
dust213–60.0217%13 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0112%13 Oct →
cache15–150.0115%12 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.017%12 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0517%11 Oct →
inferno11–130.1216%11 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0219%10 Oct →
anubis8–130.0015%10 Oct →
cache16–120.0522%7 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0617%6 Oct →
inferno2–130.0317%5 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0211%5 Oct →
dust26–130.0415%5 Oct →
nuke13–70.0121%4 Oct →
mirage5–130.0230%4 Oct →
mirage13–60.0518%4 Oct →
anubis8–130.0115%4 Oct →
cache9–130.0516%3 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0119%3 Oct →
anubis13–100.0322%3 Oct →
inferno13–70.0413%3 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0019%3 Oct →
mirage7–130.0212%2 Oct →
mirage3–130.024%2 Oct →
nuke16–120.0124%2 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0325%2 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0326%1 Oct →
anubis15–150.0118%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0119%29 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0317%29 Sept →
nuke19–220.0611%25 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0514%25 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0120%24 Sept →
inferno11–130.0117%23 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.059%23 Sept →
anubis0–13-0.075%23 Sept →
cache10–130.0416%23 Sept →
nuke0–7-0.0817%22 Sept →
ancient13–100.0112%22 Sept →
cache0–13-0.0713%22 Sept →
dust22–130.0120%21 Sept →
nuke13–50.0218%21 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.025%21 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0622%21 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.