Ruddan

Ruddan — CS2 Stats

SE76561197970402280[U:1:10136552]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,834Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,944Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#58839 of 259969 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,809 -1,167 7 Oct – 4 May · 11 days played
19,99922,976peak 22,9767 Oct4 May
22,976Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2025-10-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning64
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateWLLLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −23ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 632ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 643ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.7
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 622ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.4
Utility6.7
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time622ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy20.7%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 7–3 · inferno, 10 Oct →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · dust2, 11 Nov →
430msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 14 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 56% over 27anubisWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2715–1256%0.01
nukeB2613–1350%0.01
dust2D144–1029%-0.02
ancientC145–936%-0.03
anubisD101–910%-0.01
cache—31–233%0.02
train—32–167%-0.02
overpass—22–0100%-0.03
mirage—10–10%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

241,380Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
9,911Matches
43.7%Match win rate
40.1%Headshot %
19.4%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of tracked players
23,867MVPs
4,944Hours (in match)
14,250Bombs planted
2,972Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,289
AWP32,780
P2506,431
P906,085
MAC-104,797
Knife4,773

Lifetime map wins

24,908inferno
24,001nuke
14,000cbble
11,541dust2
5,682vertigo
3,501train
485aztec
202dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

844Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis6340%0.9015.1
Nuke5664%1.1616.8
Inferno5470%1.1116.0
Vertigo4457%0.9615.5
Ancient3928%0.8613.3
Dust2743%0.7714.6
Overpass333%0.6011.3
Train333%0.7614.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.7%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.8%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
11.6°Preaim
622msReaction time
38.4%T opening success
57.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
10.50HE damage / grenade
13.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.4485% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0627%24 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0226%24 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0130%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0115%24 Oct →
anubis11–130.0425%5 Oct →
inferno16–14-0.0115%11 Sept →
nuke16–12-0.0435%8 Sept →
nuke16–140.0121%8 Sept →
cache9–130.0114%3 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0524%3 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0527%3 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0929%30 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0416%30 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0423%26 May →
inferno13–5-0.0224%26 May →
anubis10–130.0331%26 May →
anubis10–130.006%24 May →
nuke16–140.0216%24 May →
inferno13–30.0514%14 May →
nuke13–10.0321%14 May →
anubis11–13-0.0320%14 May →
cache11–13-0.0316%10 May →
anubis9–130.0319%4 May →
inferno7–13-0.0417%4 May →
nuke6–13-0.0317%27 Apr →
nuke13–90.0434%27 Apr →
ancient13–90.0116%27 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0112%27 Apr →
dust216–13-0.0315%23 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0815%23 Apr →
nuke13–80.0325%23 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0317%23 Apr →
anubis13–70.0120%23 Apr →
nuke1–8-0.007%19 Apr →
ancient13–4-0.0623%19 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.0318%19 Apr →
nuke10–130.0024%19 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.0511%11 Apr →
anubis8–13-0.047%11 Apr →
ancient6–13-0.0113%9 Apr →
inferno13–80.0623%9 Apr →
overpass13–9-0.0714%2 Apr →
inferno13–90.0426%2 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0524%2 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0431%2 Apr →
inferno13–20.1114%2 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0321%23 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0512%23 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0118%30 Jan →
nuke13–70.0622%30 Jan →
inferno13–90.0415%23 Jan →
overpass13–10.0111%23 Jan →
nuke9–130.0238%23 Jan →
inferno13–100.0113%18 Jan →
ancient11–13-0.0817%18 Jan →
inferno13–10.0419%18 Jan →
train13–6-0.0618%18 Jan →
mirage11–130.0425%2 Jan →
inferno5–13-0.0215%2 Jan →
dust27–130.0120%2 Jan →
inferno12–12-0.0316%3 Dec →
nuke13–70.0535%3 Dec →
inferno8–13-0.0314%3 Dec →
dust27–13-0.0420%30 Nov →
nuke13–70.0323%30 Nov →
ancient7–13-0.0421%30 Nov →
nuke4–130.0530%11 Nov →
dust212–120.0139%11 Nov →
inferno11–130.0217%28 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0116%28 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0615%28 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0830%27 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0815%27 Oct →
nuke9–130.0221%27 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0018%27 Oct →
inferno13–110.0014%27 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0323%26 Oct →
nuke13–90.037%26 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0411%26 Oct →
nuke13–110.0011%25 Oct →
ancient13–60.129%25 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0812%25 Oct →
inferno9–130.0322%23 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0228%23 Oct →
inferno8–130.0317%21 Oct →
nuke13–60.0520%21 Oct →
dust24–130.0224%21 Oct →
train8–13-0.0026%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0322%13 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0729%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0319%10 Oct →
inferno7–30.1618%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0015%10 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0520%8 Oct →
inferno13–30.0429%8 Oct →
nuke12–120.0122%8 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0515%8 Oct →
train13–70.0012%7 Oct →
ancient13–30.038%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0321%7 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.