Omena

Omena — CS2 Stats

FI76561197970193207[U:1:9927479]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

807Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,681Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating26,295Top 10% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11409 of 259897 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,496 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,295 +4,897 17 Feb – 3 Nov · 24 days played
20,52526,295peak 26,29517 Feb3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,496 +0 18 Sept – 19 Sept · 2 observations
1,4961,496peak 1,49618 Sept19 Sept
26,295Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,496Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-02-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,496
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 35 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-18
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-18

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 26,295
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,705 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate43.6%46.8%48.2%4.6% short
Shot accuracy15.9%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.07meets
Match win rate41.9%46.3%46.9%5.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOmenaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,496 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,295 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,496csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–43–1Last 10056%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 606ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch4.4

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility7.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time575ms−93ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 575ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 13 Jul →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · ancient, 14 Apr →
398msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · anubis, 26 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 24anubisWeakest map · 33% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2414–1058%0.01
nukeS2417–771%0.01
dust2C177–1041%0.01
ancientA106–460%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.03
anubisD93–633%-0.01
overpass—43–175%0.04
mirage—31–233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,686Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
3,960Matches
41.9%Match win rate
43.6%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 8 players
8,706MVPs
1,681Hours (in match)
4,398Bombs planted
839Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,385
AWP10,388
FAMAS3,310
P2502,090
P901,743

Lifetime map wins

7,376dust2
6,112inferno
4,725nuke
2,023train
584cbble
190vertigo
47aztec
38lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

255Matches
53%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
85.4ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke3165%1.2917.4
Dust22148%1.2716.9
Inferno1963%1.2118.2
Anubis1533%1.0215.6
Ancient862%1.1618.5
Mirage633%1.1015.2
Cache633%1.2818.5
Overpass250%1.5025.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
603msReaction time
42.2%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
12.05HE damage / grenade
18.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.3477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–30.0429%3 Nov →
inferno16–120.0217%3 Nov →
nuke13–80.0419%3 Nov →
mirage8–130.0227%31 Oct →
nuke13–3-0.0118%31 Oct →
cache13–40.0125%31 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0013%31 Oct →
cache8–130.0130%30 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0132%30 Oct →
ancient13–20.016%30 Oct →
cache13–70.1429%30 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0328%30 Oct →
inferno11–130.0223%26 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.117%26 Oct →
cache0–3-0.070%8 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.037%5 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0525%2 Oct →
dust211–130.0013%2 Oct →
inferno13–50.0521%18 Sept →
cache12–160.0033%18 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0120%10 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0319%4 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0520%11 Aug →
cache16–120.0516%9 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0223%1 Aug →
nuke0–4-0.0529%1 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0620%1 Aug →
inferno13–160.0425%29 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0219%27 Jul →
dust213–80.0228%27 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0517%27 Jul →
nuke13–20.1014%21 Jul →
nuke7–130.0424%21 Jul →
cache13–90.0318%21 Jul →
anubis13–40.1232%20 Jul →
nuke6–130.0132%20 Jul →
inferno13–20.0524%20 Jul →
inferno13–40.1615%13 Jul →
nuke13–70.0116%13 Jul →
anubis13–80.0015%13 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0516%5 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0130%5 Jul →
ancient13–100.1126%5 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0110%29 Jun →
inferno13–110.0424%29 Jun →
dust213–10-0.0220%29 Jun →
inferno11–130.0121%24 Jun →
dust213–30.0919%24 Jun →
nuke13–80.0120%24 Jun →
inferno16–120.1116%22 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0220%22 Jun →
nuke13–80.0210%22 Jun →
ancient14–160.0325%15 May →
inferno9–13-0.0018%15 May →
dust213–110.0723%15 May →
cache12–120.0423%14 May →
inferno13–80.0313%14 May →
dust27–13-0.0124%11 May →
inferno13–90.0524%11 May →
cache13–70.0313%11 May →
inferno5–13-0.0732%27 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0013%27 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0426%27 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0121%27 Apr →
dust25–13-0.0028%20 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.0615%20 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0218%14 Apr →
dust213–110.0124%14 Apr →
ancient1–13-0.0434%14 Apr →
anubis9–130.0225%30 Mar →
dust211–130.0616%30 Mar →
nuke7–130.0530%30 Mar →
inferno13–70.0429%26 Mar →
nuke13–90.0323%26 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0224%23 Mar →
nuke13–70.0527%23 Mar →
ancient13–110.0219%23 Mar →
nuke13–100.0720%16 Mar →
ancient13–100.0312%16 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0418%16 Mar →
dust213–80.0216%14 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0221%14 Mar →
nuke16–12-0.0414%14 Mar →
overpass13–20.038%14 Mar →
overpass13–20.1131%12 Mar →
inferno13–60.0433%4 Mar →
nuke13–4-0.0226%4 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0225%4 Mar →
dust25–13-0.0226%23 Feb →
overpass13–50.0418%23 Feb →
ancient11–130.0428%23 Feb →
anubis13–16-0.0026%21 Feb →
nuke13–30.0634%21 Feb →
dust27–13-0.019%21 Feb →
inferno8–130.0225%20 Feb →
dust26–13-0.0312%20 Feb →
inferno16–140.0128%18 Feb →
nuke13–40.1123%18 Feb →
dust27–130.0020%18 Feb →
ancient13–20.019%17 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.