No Olaf, No Party!

No Olaf, No Party! — CS2 Stats

FI76561197968341232[U:1:8075504]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,799Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,088Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,674Purple band · top ~21.7% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,674 -825 31 Jul – 5 Nov · 45 days played
14,99919,306peak 19,30631 Jul5 Nov
19,306Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,124Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,632 below peak (19,306)
  • +1,187 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,178 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,326 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate50.4%44.4%46.9%above
Shot accuracy12.1%11.9%13.0%0.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.031.080.14 short
Match win rate44.4%45.2%46.7%2.3% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNo Olaf, No Party!PREMIER16,674 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,124csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning57
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +6.8pp headshot accuracy · −83ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 37%
  • Avg reaction 610ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 37%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 33%
  • Avg reaction 611ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility5.5
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.7
Utility5.5
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time616ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 616ms
Headshot accuracy31.0%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 27.4% → last ⅓ avg 31.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–11 · dust2, 18 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · cache, 1 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · nuke, 4 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17anubisWeakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB189–950%-0.01
nukeS1711–665%0.01
dust2B168–850%0.03
cacheA138–562%-0.01
ancientD134–931%0.01
anubisD121–118%-0.01
mirageB115–645%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,414Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
5,382Matches
44.4%Match win rate
50.4%Headshot % · Top 25% of Purple band
12.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Purple band
12,562MVPs
2,468Hours (in match)
7,169Bombs planted
1,450Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,147
AWP22,829
MP73,328
MAC-102,702
FAMAS2,346

Lifetime map wins

11,224nuke
11,207inferno
4,887dust2
2,167train
1,661vertigo
1,114cbble
146office
67lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

188Matches
54%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
68.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient757%0.8313.7
Nuke633%1.0016.5
Overpass475%1.3123.0
Inferno475%0.8310.0
Anubis450%0.9111.3
Mirage2100%0.8615.0
Dust22100%0.7611.5
Train10%0.5213.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

32.5%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.2%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
609msReaction time
49.4%T opening success
55.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
14.08HE damage / grenade
8.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0597° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0245%5 Nov →
cache13–70.0139%5 Nov →
anubis13–7-0.0620%5 Nov →
dust213–16-0.0544%5 Nov →
nuke11–13-0.0336%3 Nov →
dust29–130.0331%3 Nov →
ancient13–40.1237%3 Nov →
anubis10–130.0541%3 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0034%3 Nov →
nuke13–7-0.0140%2 Nov →
cache6–130.0139%2 Nov →
anubis5–130.0722%31 Oct →
dust213–40.0648%31 Oct →
ancient13–20.0328%30 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0915%30 Oct →
mirage13–30.0215%27 Oct →
ancient8–130.0652%27 Oct →
dust215–150.0326%27 Oct →
cache13–60.0127%26 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0727%24 Oct →
dust215–150.0649%23 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0429%23 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0348%23 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0037%23 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0219%16 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0231%16 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0320%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0429%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0412%10 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0522%9 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0120%9 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0022%9 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0824%9 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0231%8 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0427%8 Oct →
anubis13–160.0224%5 Oct →
nuke13–110.1042%5 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0757%3 Oct →
inferno1–13-0.0830%2 Oct →
cache1–13-0.25100%1 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0714%24 Sept →
cache11–130.0030%21 Sept →
cache13–20.1222%19 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0027%19 Sept →
anubis9–130.0234%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0429%15 Sept →
inferno8–130.0231%14 Sept →
nuke13–80.0128%14 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0137%14 Sept →
nuke13–100.0427%14 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0641%12 Sept →
cache13–110.0424%12 Sept →
dust213–50.0238%12 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0126%12 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0340%12 Sept →
inferno13–80.0230%11 Sept →
dust213–110.0446%11 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0432%10 Sept →
nuke11–130.0433%8 Sept →
dust213–80.0740%7 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0430%7 Sept →
nuke13–70.0458%6 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0543%5 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0329%4 Sept →
nuke9–130.0648%4 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0332%2 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0613%1 Sept →
mirage13–90.0030%1 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0431%1 Sept →
inferno16–14-0.0228%1 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0520%27 Aug →
ancient11–130.0332%27 Aug →
inferno9–130.0119%19 Aug →
ancient12–160.0221%19 Aug →
dust213–110.2034%18 Aug →
dust215–150.0321%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0823%17 Aug →
inferno13–20.1033%15 Aug →
anubis13–160.0028%15 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0821%8 Aug →
cache13–60.0021%8 Aug →
inferno13–40.0529%8 Aug →
ancient13–100.0427%8 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0530%7 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0340%7 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0021%7 Aug →
dust213–40.0726%7 Aug →
ancient13–100.0126%5 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0020%4 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0130%3 Aug →
inferno10–130.0330%2 Aug →
inferno13–70.0032%1 Aug →
nuke13–5-0.0341%1 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0119%1 Aug →
inferno13–30.0534%1 Aug →
nuke13–40.0123%1 Aug →
anubis7–130.0132%31 Jul →
nuke5–130.0118%31 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0153%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.