dteq

dteq — CS2 Stats

GB76561197966569458[U:1:6303730]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,026Tracked matches67%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating18,332Purple band · top ~15.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,332 +831 29 Aug – 3 Nov · 31 days played
15,77518,741peak 18,74129 Aug3 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,019 +0 1 Sept – 24 Sept · 4 observations
1,0191,019peak 1,0191 Sept24 Sept
18,741Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,019Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 409 below peak (18,741)
  • +1,446 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,668 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdteqFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER18,332 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,019csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning44
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT45–47–8Last 10045%Win rateLWWWWWTWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 569ms

Last 20

  • 13–5–2 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.1
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning4.4
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time573ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 581ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 10 Sept →
29%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 26 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · dust2, 29 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 60% over 15infernoWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2914–1548%0.00
infernoD206–1430%-0.01
nukeD165–1131%-0.01
cacheA159–660%-0.00
mirageB105–550%-0.01
anubisA74–357%-0.03
ancient—21–150%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

281Matches
49%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
72.2ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust25052%0.9414.2
Nuke2544%0.9513.3
Anubis2450%0.8311.3
Mirage2055%0.7812.3
Cache1856%0.8412.4
Inferno1346%1.0614.3
Overpass475%0.569.8
Ancient425%0.9014.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
34.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.4%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
566msReaction time
28.8%T opening success
44.5%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
14.18HE damage / grenade
5.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2421% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.8327% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis8–13-0.0918%3 Nov →
cache13–11-0.059%3 Nov →
dust216–13-0.0113%3 Nov →
vertigo13–5-0.029%1 Nov →
cache13–50.1116%31 Oct →
nuke13–40.0914%31 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0216%31 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0210%30 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.039%29 Oct →
dust213–40.0617%29 Oct →
cache5–130.049%28 Oct →
nuke7–130.0125%26 Oct →
cache13–80.0817%25 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0121%25 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.014%24 Oct →
mirage13–60.028%23 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0410%23 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0315%23 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0314%20 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0214%20 Oct →
inferno4–130.0421%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0119%19 Oct →
dust28–3-0.0320%17 Oct →
inferno13–30.0511%17 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0316%17 Oct →
nuke13–90.0617%17 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0516%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.038%17 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0021%17 Oct →
dust28–50.129%15 Oct →
inferno13–60.089%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.038%11 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0312%9 Oct →
nuke7–130.0011%9 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0117%9 Oct →
dust213–90.1214%9 Oct →
dust213–30.0620%8 Oct →
mirage12–120.0013%7 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.088%7 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0512%6 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0912%6 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0414%5 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0117%4 Oct →
anubis7–30.0421%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0816%28 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0129%26 Sept →
cache13–50.0117%26 Sept →
inferno5–130.0225%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0017%25 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0117%24 Sept →
dust213–70.0118%24 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0517%23 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0316%22 Sept →
dust28–13-0.052%22 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0717%21 Sept →
nuke15–150.0221%21 Sept →
cache13–110.0213%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.035%18 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0114%15 Sept →
mirage13–60.0712%15 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0412%15 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0215%14 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.057%14 Sept →
inferno10–130.0122%14 Sept →
ancient10–130.0416%12 Sept →
nuke9–130.0210%12 Sept →
cache13–11-0.027%12 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0616%12 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.059%12 Sept →
inferno0–13-0.1311%11 Sept →
dust213–60.1721%10 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0016%10 Sept →
inferno13–20.0729%9 Sept →
mirage13–20.0213%8 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0217%6 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.025%6 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0812%5 Sept →
inferno13–70.0314%4 Sept →
cache15–15-0.039%4 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0211%4 Sept →
dust211–130.0011%2 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0118%2 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0111%2 Sept →
mirage10–130.0211%1 Sept →
dust26–130.006%1 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0025%30 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0413%30 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0116%30 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0311%30 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0311%30 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0119%29 Aug →
nuke9–130.0014%29 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.035%29 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.097%29 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0218%29 Aug →
anubis16–13-0.0013%29 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.089%29 Aug →
dust213–90.0124%29 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0115%29 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0211%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.