eikasd #209

eikasd #209 — CS2 Stats

76561197965991913[U:1:5726185]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,979Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,450Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,857 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Sep 2026 (55 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,857 → 1,857
+45Tracked matches · now 2,979
+2.2ppWin rate · 34.5% → 36.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,983 -1,087 16 Mar – 27 May · 5 days played
20,98322,070peak 22,07016 Mar27 May
Faceit ELO: 1,857 +0 31 Aug – 11 Sept · 3 observations
1,8571,857peak 1,85731 Aug11 Sept
22,235Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,857Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-03-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,857
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 144 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.7%45.7%46.8%5.1% short
Shot accuracy16.3%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.051.060.05 short
Match win rate45.7%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeikasd #209FACEITLevel 7 · 1,857 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,857csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning40
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42–57–1Last 10042%Win rateWWWLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.2pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility6.9
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.0
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact0.6

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time577ms−65ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 14 Sept →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 17 Mar →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · ancient, 3 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W3Current streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC197–1237%-0.01
anubisD155–1033%0.00
nukeC156–940%-0.02
dust2C135–838%-0.02
mirageC135–838%0.00
infernoA117–464%-0.02
cacheA106–460%0.00
overpass—41–325%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

164,894Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
7,736Matches
45.7%Match win rate
41.7%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 7 players
17,514MVPs
4,050Hours (in match)
9,837Bombs planted
2,468Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,101
AWP8,101
FAMAS6,924
P2506,639
UMP-456,047
MAC-103,663

Lifetime map wins

14,828inferno
10,028dust2
9,315train
8,557nuke
2,400cbble
1,001vertigo
218aztec
110dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,048Matches
50%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.5ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis12350%1.0614.4
Mirage12337%0.9613.8
Ancient10247%0.9514.4
Nuke9953%1.0214.8
Overpass7264%1.0515.5
Dust25248%1.0014.9
Inferno4335%0.9716.3
Train2854%1.0613.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
37.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
584msReaction time
30.8%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
8.87HE damage / grenade
15.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.7721% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–110.039%3 Nov →
ancient13–4-0.0117%10 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0413%10 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0413%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.037%8 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0219%8 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0410%8 Oct →
anubis13–90.0116%8 Oct →
cache11–130.0117%28 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.027%28 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0314%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0113%27 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.045%27 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0322%26 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.069%26 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0128%26 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0225%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0217%26 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0020%26 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0227%24 Sept →
cache13–40.0820%24 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0319%24 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0212%24 Sept →
dust213–40.049%23 Sept →
nuke13–50.0816%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0013%23 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0411%23 Sept →
anubis13–160.0418%18 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0323%18 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0720%18 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0619%15 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0312%15 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0619%15 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0414%15 Sept →
inferno25–230.0215%14 Sept →
anubis13–50.1320%14 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0617%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0432%6 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0617%6 Sept →
ancient13–80.0120%5 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0113%5 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0615%5 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0016%5 Sept →
ancient13–50.0920%3 Sept →
anubis13–70.0419%3 Sept →
ancient13–90.0410%3 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0420%28 Aug →
mirage16–130.0719%28 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0316%28 Aug →
cache7–130.0215%28 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.0020%28 Aug →
overpass6–13-0.017%28 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0215%28 Aug →
nuke15–19-0.0513%16 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0115%16 Aug →
anubis13–50.0425%16 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.018%16 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0219%16 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0519%11 Aug →
anubis11–130.0022%11 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0615%15 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0114%15 Jul →
dust213–100.0615%15 Jul →
ancient12–16-0.037%17 Jun →
nuke9–13-0.0217%17 Jun →
nuke6–13-0.0110%17 Jun →
cache0–13-0.088%17 Jun →
ancient5–130.0224%17 Jun →
mirage9–130.0416%17 Jun →
cache8–00.0925%16 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0427%27 May →
ancient8–130.0315%27 May →
inferno13–11-0.059%27 May →
inferno8–13-0.0321%17 May →
cache13–50.0218%3 May →
ancient5–13-0.0813%6 Apr →
ancient13–110.0021%6 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0113%31 Mar →
mirage13–30.0923%31 Mar →
anubis13–100.0314%31 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.019%30 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0317%30 Mar →
mirage13–50.0113%30 Mar →
overpass8–13-0.0311%29 Mar →
inferno13–110.0512%29 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.037%29 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.0616%29 Mar →
ancient13–100.034%29 Mar →
inferno13–3-0.0215%20 Mar →
mirage8–130.0111%20 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.0133%17 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.037%17 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.0917%17 Mar →
inferno13–70.0117%17 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0110%17 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0315%16 Mar →
overpass13–50.0322%16 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.087%16 Mar →
inferno13–10-0.0117%16 Mar →
nuke13–40.0020%16 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.