strob0.o @300hz

strob0.o @300hz — CS2 Stats

76561197964141876[U:1:3876148]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,071Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,844Hours in CS
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,107Top 50% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#81683 of 259626 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,107 -686 30 Aug – 1 Nov · 26 days played
18,77123,778peak 23,77830 Aug1 Nov
23,778Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,671 below peak (23,778)
  • -1,421 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,893 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate47.7%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy14.2%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.961.051.060.10 short
Match win rate50.5%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGstrob0.o @300hzFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,107 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning69
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–50–3Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.8pp headshot accuracy · −20ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.3
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 68% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 68% on T to 51% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.9
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time550ms+36ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 550ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 6–0 · inferno, 4 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 9 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 7–1 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2212–1055%0.00
anubisC187–1139%-0.00
dust2B179–853%-0.00
ancientC146–843%0.02
nukeA127–558%-0.01
cacheA95–456%0.03
mirageD81–713%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

209,858Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
10,767Matches
50.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 7 players
47.7%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
23,800MVPs
4,844Hours (in match)
6,785Bombs planted
1,745Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4771,739
AWP16,909
P2504,171
FAMAS4,080
Tec-93,272

Lifetime map wins

13,195dust2
10,469inferno
4,234nuke
3,959cbble
2,029train
587vertigo
167office
102dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

885Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
89.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis5963%1.0816.7
Inferno3339%0.9717.8
Nuke2945%1.0616.8
Dust22433%1.1017.3
Mirage1553%1.3717.3
Ancient1450%1.0716.4
Cache1267%1.0214.3
Overpass10%0.628.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.8%Spray accuracy
81.6%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
550msReaction time
68.3%T opening success
51.1%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
4.2%Flash assists
10.70HE damage / grenade
7.88Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.0620%1 Nov →
dust213–6-0.039%1 Nov →
anubis13–30.0721%1 Nov →
anubis2–13-0.058%1 Nov →
dust213–80.0916%1 Nov →
dust213–3-0.0126%1 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0231%31 Oct →
mirage8–130.0725%25 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0124%25 Oct →
inferno16–140.0513%25 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0315%25 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0224%24 Oct →
cache13–60.0628%24 Oct →
cache13–90.0617%24 Oct →
cache13–20.1224%24 Oct →
inferno9–130.0319%22 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0227%7 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0026%7 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0527%7 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0323%3 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0216%3 Oct →
ancient13–80.0213%3 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0929%3 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0024%3 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0015%3 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0229%3 Oct →
ancient5–130.0319%2 Oct →
mirage7–130.0214%2 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0413%1 Oct →
inferno7–10.0514%1 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0420%1 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0410%1 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0724%30 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0119%30 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0219%29 Sept →
inferno16–140.0619%29 Sept →
inferno8–80.0021%29 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.036%29 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0116%28 Sept →
dust213–70.1021%27 Sept →
ancient13–80.0520%27 Sept →
nuke16–14-0.0225%27 Sept →
anubis13–110.0331%27 Sept →
dust213–16-0.0315%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0117%27 Sept →
nuke13–70.0629%27 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0517%26 Sept →
dust213–110.0330%19 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0519%19 Sept →
ancient13–80.0415%19 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.058%19 Sept →
dust216–130.0014%18 Sept →
ancient13–20.0318%18 Sept →
nuke13–80.0314%18 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0216%18 Sept →
ancient8–130.0524%18 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0219%13 Sept →
nuke13–60.0325%11 Sept →
anubis9–130.0233%11 Sept →
anubis13–80.0319%11 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0326%10 Sept →
ancient8–130.0024%10 Sept →
nuke8–3-0.0122%10 Sept →
anubis4–130.018%10 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0213%9 Sept →
inferno13–80.0118%9 Sept →
dust213–40.1335%9 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0321%9 Sept →
ancient9–130.0222%9 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0113%9 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0230%9 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0911%8 Sept →
inferno16–130.0711%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0418%8 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0816%7 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0315%7 Sept →
inferno10–130.0320%7 Sept →
anubis9–130.0512%7 Sept →
cache8–130.0210%5 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0010%5 Sept →
anubis13–50.037%5 Sept →
inferno13–80.0129%5 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0234%5 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0119%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0327%4 Sept →
ancient10–130.0827%4 Sept →
inferno6–00.1727%4 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0713%4 Sept →
cache13–50.0124%4 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0217%4 Sept →
dust216–130.0212%4 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0019%4 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0423%3 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0623%3 Sept →
dust210–13-0.1110%3 Sept →
anubis16–130.0011%2 Sept →
anubis13–30.0510%2 Sept →
cache13–60.0531%2 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0121%2 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0517%2 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.