p0p3

p0p3 — CS2 Stats

FI76561197962019421[U:1:1753693]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

860Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,355Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#71227 of 232135 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,131 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 21 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,355 +2,728 21 Feb18 Sept · 22 days played
17,62721,070peak 21,07021 Feb18 Sept
21,436Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,131Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-02-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,131
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 70 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 715 below peak (21,070)
  • +554 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,645 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGp0p3FACEITLevel 8 · 1,131 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,355 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,131csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning52
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56422Last 10056%Win rateTLWWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 221 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 9101 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.2

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 568ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.2
Utility7.5
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time569ms−83ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 23 Feb
35%Best headshot accuracy · 1–10 · mirage, 19 Aug
406msFastest reaction time · 17–19 · ancient, 6 Sept
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
126In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 43% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26161062%0.00
ancientC2191243%0.00
infernoS1812667%0.01
anubisS139469%0.02
mirageB115645%-0.01
nukeC73443%-0.02
cache31233%0.01
overpass110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

437Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
70.4ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6563%1.0813.8
Anubis5564%1.0113.9
Dust24747%1.0314.1
Ancient4342%1.0114.9
Nuke3549%0.9311.9
Mirage2646%0.9813.1
Overpass1338%0.8711.6
Train757%0.9413.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
80.1%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
568msReaction time
29.0%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
10.2%Flash assists
8.51HE damage / grenade
12.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis15–150.0121%18 Sept
ancient10–13-0.0326%14 Sept
dust213–70.0119%14 Sept
anubis13–50.0413%14 Sept
cache9–13-0.0118%10 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0414%10 Sept
dust29–13-0.0613%10 Sept
dust27–00.0533%9 Sept
mirage14–16-0.048%9 Sept
dust213–20.0216%9 Sept
nuke2–9-0.010%9 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0322%9 Sept
dust23–13-0.0719%8 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0127%8 Sept
nuke7–13-0.048%6 Sept
ancient17–190.0220%6 Sept
dust29–13-0.0118%28 Aug
ancient13–50.047%28 Aug
dust213–9-0.0218%28 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0111%28 Aug
ancient13–110.0226%28 Aug
anubis13–60.0416%28 Aug
dust213–80.0218%21 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0226%19 Aug
mirage1–10-0.0435%19 Aug
inferno13–60.0019%19 Aug
dust28–130.0128%19 Aug
dust29–00.1323%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0434%18 Aug
ancient13–50.0820%18 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0823%16 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0114%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.028%10 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0222%9 Aug
ancient7–13-0.025%9 Aug
inferno16–120.077%7 Aug
inferno14–160.0220%7 Aug
anubis22–200.0119%4 Aug
cache13–70.0619%4 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0416%31 Jul
anubis13–100.0524%31 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0215%28 Jul
cache12–16-0.0221%26 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0314%26 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0125%19 Jul
mirage13–110.0114%19 Jul
anubis13–110.0218%19 Jul
nuke13–40.0326%17 Jul
anubis13–40.0816%17 Jul
inferno13–60.0518%21 Jun
ancient7–130.0014%21 Jun
mirage13–90.0213%21 Jun
dust21–13-0.1019%2 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0315%30 May
dust213–10.0113%30 May
inferno8–13-0.0418%27 May
ancient7–13-0.0116%27 May
inferno13–40.0514%25 May
dust213–90.0216%25 May
anubis8–13-0.0611%25 May
dust216–140.0119%25 May
mirage8–13-0.0317%22 May
ancient11–130.0028%22 May
dust25–130.0019%20 May
ancient6–130.0217%20 May
inferno13–80.0211%20 May
mirage14–160.0119%20 May
ancient13–8-0.0329%20 May
dust213–10-0.0633%20 May
dust210–13-0.0023%20 May
ancient5–13-0.017%19 May
anubis8–13-0.0332%19 May
inferno13–90.0133%13 May
inferno13–11-0.0223%5 May
dust216–13-0.0020%23 Apr
mirage13–70.0429%23 Apr
mirage6–130.0223%10 Apr
dust23–130.0215%10 Apr
dust213–10-0.0113%10 Apr
ancient4–10.0718%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.0020%10 Apr
dust213–80.0821%10 Apr
inferno9–130.0018%25 Mar
dust211–60.0116%25 Mar
inferno13–100.0429%25 Mar
mirage1–13-0.0326%25 Mar
mirage13–9-0.0411%24 Mar
ancient8–130.0220%24 Mar
dust29–13-0.0131%10 Mar
overpass13–50.0418%10 Mar
ancient13–20.0520%10 Mar
dust26–130.0120%10 Mar
inferno13–70.0426%25 Feb
inferno5–10.0430%25 Feb
anubis5–13-0.016%25 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0517%25 Feb
nuke15–15-0.0322%23 Feb
anubis13–90.0111%23 Feb
anubis13–30.1917%23 Feb
ancient13–60.0622%21 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →