lum1no

lum1no — CS2 Stats

SE76561197961928421[U:1:1662693]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,233Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
4,555Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (57 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 2,233
+3.3ppWin rate · 43.3% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,616 -2,022 27 Feb – 26 Jun · 10 days played
15,61618,734peak 18,73427 Feb26 Jun
18,734Peak Premier in tracked matches
52Days played since 2025-06-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.7%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy15.0%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.061.070.05 short
Match win rate45.0%46.3%46.9%1.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlum1noFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning64
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWWLLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.07 avg rating · −0.6pp headshot accuracy · −105ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 560ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 613ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.3
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch2.8

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 591ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.4
Utility6.3
Mechanics9.0
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact3.9

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time602ms+29ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 602ms
Headshot accuracy28.3%+2.8%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.39Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 20 Mar →
53%Best headshot accuracy · 4–9 · vertigo, 20 Mar →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 26 Feb →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Jun →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 60% over 20vertigoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2414–1058%0.06
nukeA2012–860%0.04
mirageC135–838%0.04
ancientC125–742%0.02
dust2C104–640%0.03
vertigoD72–529%-0.00
anubisB63–350%0.01
cache—32–167%0.10
overpass—30–30%0.02
train—11–0100%-0.01
grail—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Vertigo is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Vertigo lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

124,942Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
6,573Matches
45.0%Match win rate
52.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
22,643MVPs
2,479Hours (in match)
4,537Bombs planted
4,429Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,680
AWP15,547
FAMAS3,127
MP92,987
SG 5531,911

Lifetime map wins

10,698vertigo
7,870inferno
5,625dust2
4,726nuke
1,228train
1,022office
638cbble
558assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

506Matches
53%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
87.1ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8844%1.1717.6
Ancient7556%1.2717.3
Vertigo6769%1.4818.7
Anubis5145%1.1517.2
Nuke2560%1.3119.6
Inferno2250%1.1519.2
Dust22070%1.1417.0
Cache667%1.5816.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
90.6%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
591msReaction time
37.1%T opening success
59.0%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
14.2%Flash assists
10.69HE damage / grenade
6.65Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1151% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Vertigo

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Vertigo callouts & strategy →Vertigo grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–70.0442%3 Nov →
ancient13–70.0124%16 Aug →
cache13–70.0935%14 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0519%12 Aug →
anubis12–160.0317%11 Aug →
ancient11–130.0230%11 Aug →
nuke31–280.0125%10 Aug →
anubis14–16-0.0025%8 Aug →
inferno5–9-0.0312%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0126%2 Aug →
cache13–70.2122%27 Jun →
inferno13–30.0826%27 Jun →
inferno9–20.2536%27 Jun →
nuke8–130.0429%26 Jun →
mirage8–130.0221%26 Jun →
inferno13–8-0.0614%26 Jun →
inferno5–130.0943%24 Jun →
inferno5–9-0.0020%23 Jun →
dust29–130.0922%3 Jun →
inferno13–30.0927%3 Jun →
vertigo9–130.0243%3 Jun →
inferno10–130.1427%28 May →
mirage13–20.0825%28 May →
mirage11–130.1621%28 May →
nuke13–100.1033%28 May →
cache6–13-0.0027%11 May →
mirage13–110.0623%5 Apr →
ancient10–130.0333%4 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0136%2 Apr →
mirage16–140.0339%30 Mar →
inferno13–70.0417%27 Mar →
vertigo4–9-0.0053%20 Mar →
nuke9–50.0839%20 Mar →
nuke9–10.3941%20 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0227%20 Mar →
overpass8–130.0922%11 Mar →
nuke8–130.0545%11 Mar →
inferno13–90.1727%11 Mar →
nuke16–130.0316%10 Mar →
nuke8–8-0.0215%8 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0424%28 Feb →
mirage13–20.1133%28 Feb →
ancient13–80.0220%27 Feb →
anubis13–90.0020%27 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0229%27 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.0324%27 Feb →
inferno13–50.1135%27 Feb →
dust213–60.1224%27 Feb →
nuke16–140.0320%27 Feb →
ancient13–100.0730%27 Feb →
anubis13–70.0323%26 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0331%26 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0233%26 Feb →
nuke13–50.0931%26 Feb →
nuke13–9-0.0227%26 Feb →
anubis13–60.0529%26 Feb →
ancient10–130.0724%22 Feb →
dust212–16-0.0117%22 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0438%22 Feb →
inferno11–20.0330%22 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0127%22 Feb →
nuke13–100.0129%22 Feb →
nuke8–13-0.0550%12 Feb →
vertigo4–9-0.069%11 Jan →
nuke13–110.0017%30 Dec →
vertigo7–90.0026%30 Dec →
inferno8–80.0537%30 Dec →
inferno9–10.1835%28 Dec →
nuke5–9-0.0627%28 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0422%27 Dec →
ancient13–20.0633%27 Dec →
dust213–100.0322%27 Dec →
ancient12–120.0615%26 Dec →
nuke13–70.1126%25 Dec →
nuke6–130.0222%25 Dec →
vertigo13–70.0214%25 Dec →
overpass5–13-0.0614%12 Dec →
inferno8–8-0.0413%8 Nov →
inferno7–90.0729%4 Nov →
train16–14-0.0120%24 Oct →
inferno9–50.1252%22 Sept →
inferno9–5-0.0323%22 Sept →
dust26–130.0324%20 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0125%12 Sept →
vertigo4–9-0.0527%25 Aug →
inferno6–130.0340%25 Aug →
inferno9–30.1139%25 Aug →
inferno6–90.0326%25 Aug →
inferno9–50.1119%25 Aug →
nuke9–50.0535%19 Aug →
vertigo13–100.0318%16 Aug →
mirage11–130.0323%16 Aug →
nuke5–9-0.0730%10 Aug →
ancient9–130.0028%6 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0620%20 Jul →
overpass10–130.0424%18 Jul →
grail13–40.1630%6 Jul →
inferno9–50.0319%30 Jun →
dust213–10.1726%30 Jun →
mirage10–130.0523%17 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.