mizq

mizq — CS2 Stats

FI76561197961061448[U:1:795720]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,796Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,192Top 50% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#80304 of 260031 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,948 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,192 -1,908 2 Sept – 4 Nov · 25 days played
19,89322,765peak 22,7652 Sept4 Nov
22,858Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,948Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-09-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,948
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 53 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,573 below peak (22,765)
  • -495 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,808 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmizqFACEITLevel 8 · 1,948 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,192 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,948csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning68
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateLWLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −38ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.3
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: higher utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning6.8
Utility7.3
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time547ms−4ms
first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 11 Oct →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 12 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · dust2, 23 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · nuke, 1 Nov →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
14–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 86% over 22anubisWeakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2219–386%0.02
dust2B2111–1052%-0.01
mirageD184–1422%-0.03
infernoA127–558%0.02
anubisD101–910%-0.01
ancientC94–544%-0.04
cacheS86–275%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

644Matches
53%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
77.8ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke9764%1.1115.8
Inferno7156%1.2315.2
Ancient6035%1.0616.0
Dust25562%1.1214.8
Anubis4137%0.9815.4
Mirage2030%0.9113.8
Train1362%1.1415.6
Cache862%1.0515.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.1%Spray accuracy
70.5%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
543msReaction time
44.0%T opening success
54.6%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
8.89HE damage / grenade
17.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage4–13-0.098%4 Nov →
ancient13–50.0217%4 Nov →
nuke1–13-0.0415%3 Nov →
nuke13–90.0510%2 Nov →
nuke13–20.0726%1 Nov →
mirage11–13-0.0111%1 Nov →
dust27–13-0.0121%31 Oct →
anubis2–130.0924%30 Oct →
inferno14–160.0234%30 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0120%30 Oct →
nuke13–60.0820%29 Oct →
dust210–130.0018%29 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0124%29 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0510%29 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.045%27 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0718%27 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0320%26 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0611%26 Oct →
mirage7–130.0316%26 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.098%25 Oct →
cache13–80.0520%25 Oct →
dust213–100.0419%25 Oct →
cache16–130.0613%25 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0322%25 Oct →
mirage13–110.0211%23 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0217%23 Oct →
ancient13–50.0117%23 Oct →
dust213–110.0219%23 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0329%22 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0216%21 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.0017%21 Oct →
nuke13–40.0925%20 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0220%20 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0123%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0524%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0918%16 Oct →
nuke13–110.0019%15 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0318%15 Oct →
mirage8–130.0225%15 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0519%15 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0212%14 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.024%14 Oct →
nuke13–40.0517%14 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.079%14 Oct →
dust26–2-0.0441%14 Oct →
dust211–130.0213%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0418%13 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0115%13 Oct →
anubis7–130.0318%13 Oct →
dust213–80.0622%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.1023%12 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.058%12 Oct →
inferno13–60.0444%12 Oct →
dust29–130.0137%12 Oct →
inferno13–20.1333%11 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0319%11 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0122%11 Oct →
nuke13–90.0033%11 Oct →
nuke12–160.0620%10 Oct →
anubis11–130.0221%10 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.045%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0117%10 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0316%9 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.0622%7 Oct →
dust210–130.0314%7 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0322%6 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.037%6 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0120%30 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0618%30 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.1214%30 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0119%29 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0130%29 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0810%27 Sept →
cache13–16-0.0230%27 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.029%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0613%24 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0513%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0325%23 Sept →
dust216–140.0218%23 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0118%23 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0720%23 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0614%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0220%23 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0126%22 Sept →
dust213–50.0117%22 Sept →
nuke13–50.0923%22 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0215%22 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0617%22 Sept →
inferno13–110.0928%21 Sept →
nuke13–40.0326%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.1014%20 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0122%20 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0216%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0511%19 Sept →
dust219–170.0125%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0324%17 Sept →
mirage13–30.0416%16 Sept →
nuke13–110.0428%15 Sept →
inferno2–13-0.0422%15 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0811%15 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.