IcE_CrEam_KiLlEr

IcE_CrEam_KiLlEr — CS2 Stats

US76561197960779795[U:1:514067]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,749Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,975Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#51401 of 231786 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,594 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 37 days played since 19 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,975 +8,189 19 Jul18 Sept · 31 days played
13,78622,347peak 22,34719 Jul18 Sept
22,347Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,594Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
37Days played since 2026-07-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,594
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 157 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 372 below peak (22,347)
  • +4,417 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,025 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIcE_CrEam_KiLlErFACEITLevel 6 · 1,594 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,975 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,594csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning55
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateLWWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.1pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.6
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.5
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time569ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+4.5%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–1 · ancient, 31 Aug
48%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · dust2, 31 Aug
445msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · anubis, 29 Jul
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
125In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 20ancientWeakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS2014670%0.02
nukeA1710759%0.02
dust2B168850%0.03
infernoA148657%0.01
ancientB115645%0.03
mirageA117464%0.01
cacheA116555%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,084Matches
48%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
80.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage22746%1.0915.4
Ancient17648%0.9815.3
Nuke17455%1.1215.9
Anubis14053%1.0115.5
Dust27641%1.0917.1
Inferno7044%0.9814.9
Train4050%1.0814.2
Overpass2843%1.0915.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.7%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.3%Spray accuracy
82.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
569msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
38.6%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
8.61HE damage / grenade
7.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.2269% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0933%18 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0326%17 Sept
ancient13–50.1026%15 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0530%15 Sept
ancient11–130.0224%11 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0511%9 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0822%9 Sept
nuke13–16-0.0121%8 Sept
anubis7–130.0422%7 Sept
dust213–100.1024%7 Sept
inferno13–80.0731%7 Sept
dust213–70.1027%7 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0615%7 Sept
dust210–130.0026%7 Sept
nuke13–110.0530%7 Sept
anubis16–140.0621%7 Sept
dust213–110.0628%7 Sept
nuke9–130.0316%6 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0122%5 Sept
ancient15–150.0522%4 Sept
ancient10–130.0730%4 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0138%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0233%4 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0631%3 Sept
nuke2–13-0.0739%3 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0227%3 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0141%3 Sept
mirage9–130.0020%2 Sept
cache6–130.0230%2 Sept
anubis13–100.0522%2 Sept
anubis13–50.1233%1 Sept
dust24–130.0219%1 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0218%1 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0437%31 Aug
ancient13–10.1522%31 Aug
dust213–60.0548%31 Aug
anubis13–110.0524%31 Aug
nuke13–60.1134%31 Aug
cache13–80.0337%31 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0013%31 Aug
cache14–16-0.0514%27 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0512%27 Aug
inferno15–150.0430%26 Aug
anubis13–80.0116%25 Aug
inferno13–110.0228%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0623%24 Aug
ancient16–140.0618%24 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0013%24 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0427%23 Aug
anubis15–150.0211%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0415%23 Aug
inferno13–70.0228%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0431%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0515%23 Aug
nuke16–120.1427%23 Aug
cache10–00.0518%23 Aug
nuke7–130.0223%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0124%23 Aug
dust210–130.0622%21 Aug
cache13–50.1116%21 Aug
cache9–130.0220%21 Aug
nuke13–50.0135%20 Aug
mirage13–100.0120%20 Aug
cache13–16-0.0418%17 Aug
anubis13–30.0625%16 Aug
inferno13–20.0422%16 Aug
dust28–13-0.0222%16 Aug
cache16–130.0427%16 Aug
inferno13–90.0226%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0119%14 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0027%11 Aug
mirage13–70.0617%10 Aug
anubis16–140.0424%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0316%5 Aug
nuke9–130.0627%5 Aug
ancient13–90.0024%4 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0020%31 Jul
dust213–70.0728%29 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0120%29 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0018%29 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0218%28 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0014%27 Jul
nuke13–2-0.0217%26 Jul
dust213–60.0623%26 Jul
nuke13–40.0924%26 Jul
inferno13–60.1029%26 Jul
mirage13–30.1025%26 Jul
dust210–13-0.0118%26 Jul
anubis14–160.0031%26 Jul
inferno8–130.0319%26 Jul
dust213–110.0824%26 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0323%25 Jul
cache13–11-0.0019%25 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0318%22 Jul
anubis13–160.0218%19 Jul
cache13–80.0216%19 Jul
dust29–130.0422%19 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0026%19 Jul
dust213–30.0318%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0114%19 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →