kelkkösoos

kelkkösoos — CS2 Stats

TR76561197960624240[U:1:358512]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,582Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPassive Rifler
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning43
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateWLWWWWLWLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression2.4
Utility3.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 30 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 646ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.3
Utility3.4
Mechanics8.4
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time648ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.09Best rating — cache 13–6
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 68% over 19dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheS1913668%-0.01
ancientC1881044%-0.02
anubisC146843%-0.04
dust2D1441029%-0.03
overpassC125742%-0.02
mirageC104640%-0.04
infernoA53260%-0.04
nuke31233%-0.00
boulder110100%-0.01
italy110100%-0.08
stronghold1010%-0.04
warden110100%0.04
vertigo1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

439Matches
55%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
65.8ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12563%1.0014.0
Anubis9053%0.9815.1
Dust26159%0.9213.3
Nuke5746%0.9113.3
Mirage2934%0.8213.3
Overpass2662%0.9813.3
Train1540%0.8313.6
Inferno875%1.1512.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
87.6%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
646msReaction time
18.6%T opening success
38.3%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
5.29HE damage / grenade
3.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.409 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 18.5851% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–8-0.0510%28 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0515%28 Aug
cache13–100.0111%28 Aug
mirage22–18-0.0615%23 Aug
cache13–9-0.0550%22 Aug
cache13–7-0.0123%19 Aug
cache6–13-0.0812%19 Aug
cache13–11-0.0528%13 Aug
cache21–25-0.0620%16 Jul
cache12–12-0.0322%16 Jul
cache13–11-0.0511%13 Jul
anubis8–13-0.1118%13 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0514%13 Jul
cache13–6-0.0414%13 Jul
ancient16–140.0313%11 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0317%11 Jul
cache11–50.0219%11 Jul
cache9–13-0.0315%9 Jul
boulder13–4-0.0113%9 Jul
cache13–40.0521%8 Jul
cache13–5-0.040%8 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0316%5 Jul
overpass7–13-0.0719%5 Jul
cache13–60.0929%20 Jun
cache13–50.0212%19 Jun
dust213–80.0119%19 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0410%19 Jun
cache13–80.0417%19 Jun
mirage10–13-0.079%6 Jun
anubis11–13-0.085%6 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0128%6 Jun
dust27–13-0.0315%6 Jun
cache13–50.0327%3 May
cache10–13-0.058%3 May
nuke3–130.0312%2 May
dust24–13-0.1018%2 May
overpass8–13-0.0118%2 May
cache7–13-0.0120%2 May
dust26–13-0.0124%5 Apr
overpass13–8-0.0413%5 Apr
inferno13–80.0021%5 Apr
dust212–12-0.0737%4 Apr
ancient13–30.0920%4 Apr
overpass13–60.0023%4 Apr
anubis13–50.0124%4 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0010%4 Apr
inferno13–3-0.0413%4 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0216%4 Apr
dust26–13-0.1117%4 Apr
overpass11–13-0.0327%29 Mar
ancient13–4-0.0129%29 Mar
overpass4–130.0218%29 Mar
inferno13–5-0.0518%29 Mar
anubis7–13-0.0415%29 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0520%28 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0119%28 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0620%22 Mar
dust210–130.0124%22 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0027%22 Mar
anubis9–1-0.0215%22 Mar
dust213–10-0.0619%21 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0514%21 Mar
anubis12–16-0.058%21 Mar
dust211–13-0.0414%21 Mar
ancient7–130.0118%21 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0321%12 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0510%12 Mar
dust24–13-0.0211%6 Mar
anubis8–13-0.007%6 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0112%6 Mar
dust28–13-0.0128%6 Mar
ancient13–2-0.0525%4 Mar
ancient13–10.0119%4 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0123%3 Mar
overpass13–110.0015%3 Mar
ancient13–3-0.0424%3 Mar
mirage9–13-0.0419%3 Mar
ancient4–13-0.127%3 Mar
overpass7–0-0.0317%3 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0618%2 Mar
anubis15–15-0.0714%2 Mar
anubis13–4-0.0416%2 Mar
nuke3–130.0215%2 Mar
mirage16–120.0116%2 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0715%2 Mar
overpass10–13-0.0120%1 Mar
ancient10–13-0.0518%1 Mar
mirage11–130.0021%1 Mar
italy6–5-0.085%1 Mar
dust213–9-0.0220%1 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0517%28 Feb
dust25–130.0235%28 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0713%28 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0016%28 Feb
ancient12–120.0514%28 Feb
stronghold11–13-0.045%28 Feb
warden13–30.0422%28 Feb
vertigo7–13-0.049%28 Feb
dust213–8-0.037%28 Feb
anubis13–3-0.0413%28 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →