kelkkösoos

kelkkösoos — CS2 Stats

TR76561197960624240[U:1:358512]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,599Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,609 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (25 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,609 → 1,609
+17Tracked matches · now 1,599
0.0ppWin rate · 62.1% → 62.1%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,273 -3,713 1 Mar – 6 Jun · 10 days played
18,27323,653peak 23,6531 Mar6 Jun
Faceit ELO: 1,609 +0 29 Aug – 20 Sept · 3 observations
1,6091,609peak 1,60929 Aug20 Sept
23,653Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,609Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-02-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,609
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 142 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkelkkösoosFACEITLevel 7 · 1,609 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,609csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning37
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–47–5Last 10048%Win rateWLLWWLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.5pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 620ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 638ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility2.9
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Excellent counter-strafingLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 639ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning3.7
Utility2.9
Mechanics8.7
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time636ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 668ms → last ⅓ avg 636ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–6 · cache, 20 Jun →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · cache, 22 Aug →
484msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · cache, 22 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 4 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 64% over 22dust2Weakest map · 21% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2214–864%-0.01
ancientB168–850%-0.02
dust2D143–1121%-0.04
anubisC146–843%-0.04
overpassC125–742%-0.02
mirageC104–640%-0.04
infernoA53–260%-0.04
nuke—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—11–0100%-0.02
boulder—11–0100%-0.01
italy—11–0100%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (21% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

452Matches
56%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
65.5ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12764%1.0013.9
Anubis9154%0.9715.0
Dust26555%0.8912.9
Nuke5947%0.9213.2
Mirage2934%0.8213.3
Overpass2662%0.9813.3
Train1540%0.8313.6
Inferno875%1.1512.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
89.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
639msReaction time
20.2%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.63HE damage / grenade
2.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3392 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2435% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

21% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–11-0.0419%15 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0221%15 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0719%14 Oct →
anubis16–14-0.0518%14 Oct →
cache13–60.0026%13 Oct →
dust26–13-0.1115%13 Oct →
vertigo13–3-0.0214%13 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0910%13 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0620%13 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0510%28 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0515%28 Aug →
cache13–100.0111%28 Aug →
mirage22–18-0.0615%23 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0550%22 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0123%19 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0812%19 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0528%13 Aug →
cache21–25-0.0620%16 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0322%16 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0511%13 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.1118%13 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0514%13 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0414%13 Jul →
ancient16–140.0313%11 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.0317%11 Jul →
cache11–50.0219%11 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0315%9 Jul →
boulder13–4-0.0113%9 Jul →
cache13–40.0521%8 Jul →
cache13–5-0.040%8 Jul →
ancient7–13-0.0316%5 Jul →
overpass7–13-0.0719%5 Jul →
cache13–60.0929%20 Jun →
cache13–50.0212%19 Jun →
dust213–80.0119%19 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0410%19 Jun →
cache13–80.0417%19 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.079%6 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.085%6 Jun →
ancient13–8-0.0128%6 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0315%6 Jun →
cache13–50.0327%3 May →
cache10–13-0.058%3 May →
nuke3–130.0312%2 May →
dust24–13-0.1018%2 May →
overpass8–13-0.0118%2 May →
cache7–13-0.0120%2 May →
dust26–13-0.0124%5 Apr →
overpass13–8-0.0413%5 Apr →
inferno13–80.0021%5 Apr →
dust212–12-0.0737%4 Apr →
ancient13–30.0920%4 Apr →
overpass13–60.0023%4 Apr →
anubis13–50.0124%4 Apr →
ancient13–11-0.0010%4 Apr →
inferno13–3-0.0413%4 Apr →
mirage13–11-0.0216%4 Apr →
dust26–13-0.1117%4 Apr →
overpass11–13-0.0327%29 Mar →
ancient13–4-0.0129%29 Mar →
overpass4–130.0218%29 Mar →
inferno13–5-0.0518%29 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0415%29 Mar →
mirage13–10-0.0520%28 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0119%28 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0620%22 Mar →
dust210–130.0124%22 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0027%22 Mar →
anubis9–1-0.0215%22 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0619%21 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0514%21 Mar →
anubis12–16-0.058%21 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0414%21 Mar →
ancient7–130.0118%21 Mar →
overpass13–7-0.0321%12 Mar →
inferno8–13-0.0510%12 Mar →
dust24–13-0.0211%6 Mar →
anubis8–13-0.007%6 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0112%6 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0128%6 Mar →
ancient13–2-0.0525%4 Mar →
ancient13–10.0119%4 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.0123%3 Mar →
overpass13–110.0015%3 Mar →
ancient13–3-0.0424%3 Mar →
mirage9–13-0.0419%3 Mar →
ancient4–13-0.127%3 Mar →
overpass7–0-0.0317%3 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0618%2 Mar →
anubis15–15-0.0714%2 Mar →
anubis13–4-0.0416%2 Mar →
nuke3–130.0215%2 Mar →
mirage16–120.0116%2 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0715%2 Mar →
overpass10–13-0.0120%1 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0518%1 Mar →
mirage11–130.0021%1 Mar →
italy6–5-0.085%1 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0220%1 Mar →
anubis12–12-0.0517%28 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.