Zurg :D★ — CS2 Stats

76561198045027345[U:1:84761617]

1,599Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating26,837Top 10% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1213 of 22590 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,154 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZurg :D★FACEITLevel 9 · 2,154 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER26,837 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning63
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateWLLLWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5
Aggression8.6
Utility7.0
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.80 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 557ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.3
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time570ms−52ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy20.2%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–8
130Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
1011In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB34161847%0.00
ancientA1810856%-0.02
anubisD1541127%-0.02
dust2A159660%0.00
nukeB84450%-0.00
mirageS75271%0.01
inferno2020%0.05
overpass1010%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

787Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
78.0ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9956%1.0416.2
Anubis8352%0.9615.1
Dust26653%1.0615.8
Nuke5446%1.0616.5
Cache3352%1.0415.6
Mirage2446%1.0416.5
Overpass1553%0.9611.5
Train825%0.9515.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
39.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.5%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
557msReaction time
36.1%T opening success
50.2%CT opening success
0.80Enemies flashed / flash
18.2%Flash assists
12.57HE damage / grenade
7.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.0726% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–8-0.0426%27 Aug
ancient11–130.019%26 Aug
inferno4–130.0728%25 Aug
cache2–13-0.0721%25 Aug
mirage13–50.0323%25 Aug
cache11–130.0420%25 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0715%25 Aug
mirage22–180.0012%23 Aug
cache13–90.0419%22 Aug
ancient12–16-0.0217%17 Aug
anubis11–130.0214%17 Aug
anubis13–30.0345%16 Aug
cache7–13-0.0414%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.0348%16 Aug
inferno12–120.0232%16 Aug
cache9–130.0719%16 Aug
dust213–80.047%15 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0229%15 Aug
anubis10–130.0125%15 Aug
dust213–110.0423%14 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0412%14 Aug
dust213–90.0918%14 Aug
ancient13–40.0118%14 Aug
cache13–11-0.0014%13 Aug
cache3–13-0.0324%6 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0912%6 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0621%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0620%5 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0320%5 Aug
cache14–16-0.0314%5 Aug
cache6–13-0.0326%5 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0316%5 Aug
anubis11–13-0.076%4 Aug
dust213–20.0727%3 Aug
anubis13–7-0.008%3 Aug
cache13–90.0218%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0414%3 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0119%3 Aug
dust211–13-0.0023%2 Aug
cache13–00.0613%2 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0613%27 Jul
cache7–13-0.0211%27 Jul
ancient8–130.0519%26 Jul
cache13–50.0117%26 Jul
cache9–13-0.0019%25 Jul
anubis13–110.016%25 Jul
dust213–11-0.0215%25 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0719%25 Jul
nuke13–3-0.0223%24 Jul
cache15–150.0116%24 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0318%22 Jul
cache19–16-0.0111%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0413%22 Jul
cache21–25-0.019%16 Jul
cache12–12-0.0014%16 Jul
cache13–9-0.0314%16 Jul
dust26–13-0.0513%15 Jul
dust20–8-0.0433%14 Jul
cache13–110.0427%14 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0227%14 Jul
cache9–130.0313%14 Jul
cache13–110.0016%13 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0115%13 Jul
ancient7–130.0221%13 Jul
cache13–60.1022%13 Jul
dust216–12-0.0114%12 Jul
ancient13–1-0.0110%12 Jul
cache13–5-0.0112%12 Jul
nuke10–130.109%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0321%12 Jul
cache14–16-0.029%12 Jul
dust213–70.0310%12 Jul
ancient13–20.019%11 Jul
nuke13–90.019%11 Jul
dust210–13-0.0410%11 Jul
nuke13–70.0418%11 Jul
cache8–130.0418%11 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0411%11 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0114%11 Jul
cache11–5-0.046%11 Jul
cache13–10-0.0320%7 Jul
ancient13–100.0216%7 Jul
ancient13–50.0513%6 Jul
cache11–13-0.0320%6 Jul
dust27–13-0.029%6 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0515%6 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0621%5 Jul
overpass7–13-0.056%5 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0816%2 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0111%2 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0126%2 Jul
ancient3–9-0.0128%29 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0115%25 Jun
mirage12–120.0121%25 Jun
mirage13–80.1520%25 Jun
dust213–100.0319%25 Jun
cache13–80.0615%23 Jun
cache13–8-0.0311%18 Jun
cache13–9-0.0427%18 Jun
cache12–12-0.0133%18 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →