mainevent

mainevent — CS2 Stats

76561197960455769[U:1:190041]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,254Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,565Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#24288 of 252626 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,721 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Sep 2026 (45 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,721 → 1,721
+2Tracked matches · now 1,254
−6.7ppWin rate · 50.0% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,793 +1,450 11 Apr – 2 Sept · 28 days played
22,45424,793peak 24,79311 Apr2 Sept
24,991Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,721Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-04-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,721
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate43.7%45.7%46.8%3.1% short
Shot accuracy10.1%12.7%13.0%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.841.051.060.22 short
Match win rate45.6%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmaineventFACEITLevel 7 · 1,721 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,721csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning45
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +0.9pp headshot accuracy · −31ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.5
Utility4.5
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time607ms−15ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 607ms
Headshot accuracy17.5%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–10 · inferno, 28 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 26 Jul →
438msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · anubis, 24 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 15 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19ancientWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3118–1358%-0.02
infernoC2510–1540%-0.01
nukeA1912–763%0.00
cacheD123–925%-0.03
ancientD70–70%-0.04
anubis—42–250%-0.03
mirage—20–20%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,771Lifetime kills
0.84K/D
2,139Matches
45.6%Match win rate
43.7%Headshot %
10.1%Shot accuracy
4,542MVPs
1,059Hours (in match)
2,405Bombs planted
526Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4715,095
AWP7,454
P2501,045
Knife553

Lifetime map wins

6,928dust2
5,485inferno
3,636nuke
387train
114cbble
97vertigo
34dust
23assault

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

486Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
77.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno13852%1.1416.3
Nuke9856%1.1616.1
Dust28756%1.0616.6
Ancient6152%1.1115.9
Anubis4937%0.9315.5
Mirage3832%1.0916.4
Cache1242%0.9814.0
Overpass367%1.2018.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.4%Spray accuracy
84.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
615msReaction time
24.9%T opening success
44.7%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
12.77HE damage / grenade
5.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4346 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8829% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke7–13-0.0233%16 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1122%16 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0410%1 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0529%1 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0716%31 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0425%31 Aug →
nuke13–80.0218%25 Aug →
nuke14–160.0312%25 Aug →
inferno16–13-0.0517%25 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0118%24 Aug →
nuke13–80.0921%23 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0614%21 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0224%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0423%14 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0614%11 Aug →
inferno13–90.0515%11 Aug →
dust28–130.0113%8 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0421%8 Aug →
cache8–130.0029%7 Aug →
inferno13–40.0621%7 Aug →
nuke13–100.0111%5 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0525%5 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0511%5 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.035%5 Aug →
dust213–3-0.016%4 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0617%4 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0211%2 Aug →
dust213–30.0615%2 Aug →
nuke13–100.0723%1 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0419%1 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0313%28 Jul →
inferno13–100.1120%28 Jul →
ancient14–16-0.066%26 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.066%26 Jul →
cache11–130.0320%26 Jul →
inferno7–13-0.0436%26 Jul →
dust213–110.0017%26 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0214%26 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.0113%25 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0618%25 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0316%25 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0418%25 Jul →
nuke11–130.0119%24 Jul →
dust213–80.0019%24 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.089%21 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0220%21 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0319%19 Jul →
dust213–60.0515%19 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0118%19 Jul →
inferno13–11-0.048%14 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0225%13 Jul →
cache2–13-0.0513%13 Jul →
nuke13–30.0114%10 Jul →
dust213–6-0.0620%10 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0525%17 Jun →
anubis8–13-0.0711%9 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0927%9 Jun →
cache5–13-0.0811%4 Jun →
nuke16–13-0.0112%3 Jun →
cache8–13-0.1011%27 May →
nuke6–13-0.0910%27 May →
ancient11–13-0.0121%20 May →
inferno13–50.0613%18 May →
nuke9–130.0415%17 May →
dust212–16-0.0218%17 May →
inferno13–20.029%15 May →
ancient9–13-0.0214%14 May →
dust213–10-0.0117%12 May →
cache13–11-0.0111%11 May →
inferno16–14-0.0321%11 May →
anubis3–13-0.0713%8 May →
dust213–8-0.0220%8 May →
inferno11–13-0.0115%7 May →
inferno13–100.0322%7 May →
nuke13–80.0315%7 May →
inferno8–130.0323%7 May →
nuke13–90.037%7 May →
dust210–13-0.0210%6 May →
dust213–40.066%6 May →
cache10–13-0.0116%6 May →
nuke8–13-0.066%4 May →
inferno5–13-0.009%3 May →
dust216–12-0.0312%3 May →
dust212–120.0217%3 May →
cache4–13-0.0422%2 May →
anubis13–110.0113%2 May →
dust213–40.0114%2 May →
dust213–10-0.057%1 May →
cache13–80.0818%1 May →
dust213–110.0015%27 Apr →
dust27–13-0.029%26 Apr →
inferno7–130.0022%23 Apr →
inferno8–13-0.0010%20 Apr →
dust213–8-0.0210%20 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0420%20 Apr →
inferno13–16-0.0020%16 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0624%16 Apr →
nuke13–60.0120%16 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0430%13 Apr →
mirage10–130.0018%11 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.