This Lobbies not fair like

This Lobbies not fair like — CS2 Stats

76561197960371158[U:1:105430]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

525Tracked matches55%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating17,952Purple band · top ~16.6% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+235Premier CS Rating · 17,717 → 17,952

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,952 +5,153 11 Sept – 11 Oct · 22 days played
12,79918,494peak 18,49411 Sept11 Oct
18,494Peak Premier in tracked matches
22Days played since 2026-09-11

Premier CS Rating

  • 542 below peak (18,494)
  • +5,153 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,048 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGThis Lobbies not fair likePREMIER17,952 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning50
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–48–3Last 10049%Win rateWWLLWTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.2pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 598ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time604ms+28ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 21 Sept →
39%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 22 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · anubis, 7 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · cache, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 23infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2313–1057%0.01
cacheS2316–770%0.02
infernoD123–925%-0.02
dust2D124–833%-0.01
anubisC114–736%-0.02
ancientA116–555%0.01
nukeC83–538%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
598msReaction time
44.2%T opening success
34.6%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
4.6%Flash assists
6.49HE damage / grenade
10.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4433 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 34.5771% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–5-0.0126%11 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0321%11 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0416%11 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0414%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0816%11 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0518%10 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0710%10 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0323%10 Oct →
ancient8–130.029%9 Oct →
cache13–70.0223%7 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0217%7 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.066%7 Oct →
cache13–50.0517%7 Oct →
anubis16–120.0111%7 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0313%6 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0511%6 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0414%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0219%6 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0532%6 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0217%6 Oct →
mirage12–160.0012%6 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0219%5 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0131%5 Oct →
mirage10–130.0315%5 Oct →
nuke13–80.0617%5 Oct →
mirage13–50.0021%5 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0125%5 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0513%5 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0316%5 Oct →
dust213–90.0219%5 Oct →
inferno3–7-0.0519%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0522%4 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0511%4 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0825%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0213%3 Oct →
cache13–70.0914%3 Oct →
mirage13–110.0211%3 Oct →
anubis13–80.056%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0517%2 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0313%2 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0818%2 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0211%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0220%2 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.044%2 Oct →
cache13–50.0116%2 Oct →
dust213–100.0616%1 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0427%1 Oct →
nuke3–60.0013%1 Oct →
dust24–13-0.063%1 Oct →
nuke13–110.0017%1 Oct →
dust213–60.0736%30 Sept →
cache13–2-0.0118%25 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0020%25 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0119%25 Sept →
ancient16–130.0310%25 Sept →
cache13–90.0218%24 Sept →
ancient3–13-0.0521%24 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0314%24 Sept →
ancient13–160.0414%23 Sept →
cache13–30.1115%23 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0326%23 Sept →
mirage13–70.1123%23 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.018%23 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0114%23 Sept →
dust28–130.0410%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0620%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.0121%22 Sept →
cache13–40.0539%22 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0125%22 Sept →
inferno6–130.0014%22 Sept →
mirage13–40.1320%21 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0215%21 Sept →
cache6–13-0.059%21 Sept →
cache7–130.0428%21 Sept →
nuke13–16-0.0011%21 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0213%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.0416%20 Sept →
ancient3–6-0.0528%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0219%20 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0221%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.028%17 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.019%17 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0110%17 Sept →
cache13–30.1320%17 Sept →
ancient13–3-0.0211%15 Sept →
cache13–80.0523%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0510%15 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.078%15 Sept →
mirage13–30.0725%14 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.014%14 Sept →
ancient13–40.086%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.057%14 Sept →
cache13–110.0718%13 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0110%13 Sept →
cache8–130.1019%13 Sept →
nuke10–130.0612%13 Sept →
inferno15–150.0014%13 Sept →
ancient13–60.0619%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.029%13 Sept →
anubis13–90.0120%11 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.