Klypa

Klypa — CS2 Stats

76561197960370286[U:1:104558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,398Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,931Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#66123 of 242150 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,643 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 54 days played since 17 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,931 +2,822 18 Jun23 Sept · 19 days played
17,55722,011peak 22,01118 Jun23 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,643 +0 2 Sept18 Sept · 4 observations
1,6431,643peak 1,6432 Sept18 Sept
22,378Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,643Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
54Days played since 2026-06-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,643
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 108 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,080 below peak (22,011)
  • -865 over 30 days · declining
  • +3,000 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,069 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKlypaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,643 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,931 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,643csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5545Last 10055%Win rateLLWWWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 590ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.5 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time583ms−70ms
first ⅓ avg 654ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%+1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Aug
43%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 11 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · anubis, 15 Aug
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
109In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 7dust2Weakest map · 35% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2314961%-0.01
dust2C2071335%-0.01
ancientA1911858%0.00
cacheA149564%-0.02
mirageC94544%-0.02
infernoS75271%0.00
anubisA74357%-0.00
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,068Matches
52%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
72.3ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient14056%1.0616.1
Nuke13260%1.0314.5
Dust210040%0.9114.3
Inferno6441%0.8412.8
Anubis6146%1.0115.1
Mirage4943%1.0515.2
Train4661%0.9714.4
Cache4055%0.9914.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
31.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.7%Spray accuracy
72.8%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
578msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
37.1%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
11.1%Flash assists
11.40HE damage / grenade
8.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5296% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0510%23 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0622%23 Sept
dust213–10-0.0229%21 Sept
nuke13–90.0318%15 Sept
nuke13–10.0116%14 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0330%12 Sept
dust211–13-0.0224%11 Sept
nuke2–13-0.1222%11 Sept
ancient13–100.0121%6 Sept
nuke13–100.0611%6 Sept
dust213–60.0323%4 Sept
inferno7–130.0122%3 Sept
dust216–12-0.0015%3 Sept
ancient16–140.0422%30 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0320%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0213%28 Aug
cache13–11-0.0228%28 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0622%25 Aug
nuke13–8-0.007%23 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0533%22 Aug
nuke13–2-0.0615%22 Aug
ancient19–150.0519%21 Aug
nuke20–220.0315%20 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0424%15 Aug
cache5–13-0.0625%15 Aug
anubis13–30.0932%15 Aug
dust26–13-0.0425%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0343%11 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0614%10 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0326%10 Aug
cache9–13-0.046%9 Aug
ancient13–16-0.0423%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0318%8 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0115%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0113%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0035%7 Aug
mirage13–110.0114%6 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0416%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0321%5 Aug
ancient13–80.0320%5 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0239%31 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0927%30 Jul
nuke13–30.0521%29 Jul
ancient16–120.0522%29 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0412%29 Jul
cache2–13-0.0522%29 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0627%27 Jul
dust211–130.0527%26 Jul
ancient13–100.0623%26 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0119%25 Jul
cache13–70.0825%24 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0411%24 Jul
cache13–5-0.0123%24 Jul
dust213–100.0420%21 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0326%21 Jul
cache8–13-0.0522%18 Jul
dust213–110.0023%16 Jul
nuke13–70.0217%16 Jul
ancient13–110.0220%16 Jul
dust213–16-0.0616%14 Jul
cache13–5-0.0025%14 Jul
dust213–5-0.0117%12 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0017%12 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0316%11 Jul
cache11–13-0.0127%10 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0226%10 Jul
nuke13–30.0921%9 Jul
mirage13–110.0213%9 Jul
ancient13–60.0224%9 Jul
dust211–13-0.0224%8 Jul
cache16–130.0033%6 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0022%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0820%3 Jul
dust213–90.0823%3 Jul
ancient8–13-0.058%3 Jul
dust211–13-0.0520%2 Jul
ancient13–80.0226%2 Jul
cache13–100.0214%2 Jul
anubis7–130.0314%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0713%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.0119%28 Jun
cache13–7-0.0417%28 Jun
cache13–80.0310%28 Jun
nuke13–8-0.0210%27 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0228%27 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0328%27 Jun
nuke13–110.0124%26 Jun
dust25–13-0.0521%26 Jun
ancient13–110.0227%26 Jun
dust27–13-0.0617%25 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0117%25 Jun
anubis13–90.0329%25 Jun
ancient11–130.0020%25 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0316%24 Jun
ancient19–150.0114%24 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0525%23 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0413%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0310%22 Jun
inferno13–70.0722%18 Jun
cache13–2-0.0914%17 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →