Hay_Hay

Hay_Hay — CS2 Stats

NO76561197960609149[U:1:343421]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,153Tracked matches67%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,511Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86646 of 242150 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,511 → 19,511
0Faceit ELO · 1,499 → 1,499
+39Tracked matches · now 3,153
+10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 66.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 12 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,511 -2,697 12 Jun1 Sept · 7 days played
19,51123,321peak 23,32112 Jun1 Sept
23,378Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,499Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-06-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,499
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,810 below peak (23,321)
  • -159 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,697 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 489 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHay_HayFACEITLevel 7 · 1,499 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER19,511 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,499csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning59
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59401Last 10059%Win rateWWWLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +49ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 571ms

Last 20

  • 155 · 75% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility6.8
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 70% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning5.9
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time566ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−3.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–9 · nuke, 15 Sept
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · cache, 4 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 28 Aug
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
123In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 88% over 16ancientWeakest map · 38% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2491538%-0.01
nukeS1614288%0.00
dust2B168850%-0.01
cacheB158753%0.00
anubisS1510567%-0.01
infernoA85363%-0.03
mirageS54180%-0.01
vertigo110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

737Matches
52%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
72.7ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke13863%1.0614.7
Ancient13747%0.8914.8
Dust29352%0.9713.5
Anubis7158%0.9414.2
Inferno5847%0.8113.2
Mirage4436%0.8012.3
Cache4042%1.0013.3
Train3569%0.9012.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
564msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
52.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
11.45Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8944% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–60.017%22 Sept
vertigo13–40.0327%22 Sept
nuke13–5-0.0210%20 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0114%19 Sept
mirage19–15-0.0017%19 Sept
nuke13–40.0128%19 Sept
dust213–8-0.0216%18 Sept
cache9–13-0.037%18 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0116%18 Sept
anubis13–50.0224%18 Sept
cache13–5-0.015%18 Sept
nuke13–90.0911%15 Sept
dust213–16-0.0614%9 Sept
anubis13–110.0217%5 Sept
dust213–6-0.0114%4 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0115%30 Aug
cache3–13-0.0518%29 Aug
inferno19–17-0.0214%29 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0811%28 Aug
cache13–110.0120%28 Aug
anubis13–30.0624%15 Aug
ancient9–130.0412%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0123%11 Aug
nuke13–110.0316%11 Aug
ancient22–25-0.0321%9 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0335%9 Aug
mirage8–13-0.078%8 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0314%8 Aug
ancient12–160.0211%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0324%8 Aug
nuke13–60.0515%7 Aug
dust29–13-0.0517%7 Aug
cache3–13-0.039%6 Aug
anubis13–100.0116%6 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0115%6 Aug
inferno13–100.0414%6 Aug
anubis16–19-0.0315%4 Aug
dust213–8-0.0213%4 Aug
cache13–60.0541%4 Aug
ancient6–130.0431%4 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0020%4 Aug
dust210–13-0.0415%3 Aug
ancient13–60.0111%3 Aug
dust213–11-0.0026%2 Aug
cache9–130.0529%31 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0228%31 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0223%26 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0412%26 Jul
cache11–13-0.0716%26 Jul
inferno5–13-0.074%21 Jul
dust22–13-0.077%21 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0613%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0523%20 Jul
dust213–9-0.0219%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0015%20 Jul
cache8–130.0030%19 Jul
ancient1–8-0.0612%19 Jul
dust210–130.0018%19 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0227%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0530%17 Jul
nuke13–90.0225%17 Jul
cache13–80.0318%17 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0219%17 Jul
ancient10–130.0122%16 Jul
cache13–70.0520%16 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0221%16 Jul
ancient13–10.0926%16 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0014%16 Jul
nuke13–90.0116%16 Jul
dust25–130.0122%16 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0123%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0317%13 Jul
dust213–50.0517%12 Jul
nuke16–120.0425%12 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0614%2 Jul
dust213–60.0522%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0323%30 Jun
dust213–80.0513%30 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0121%30 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0826%30 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0815%29 Jun
cache13–60.0328%29 Jun
inferno3–13-0.0619%23 Jun
anubis16–14-0.0113%23 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0813%23 Jun
dust215–150.0225%21 Jun
ancient13–60.0630%21 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0621%21 Jun
ancient5–130.0225%20 Jun
nuke13–100.0312%20 Jun
cache13–20.0318%17 Jun
nuke13–4-0.0324%15 Jun
nuke1–13-0.0815%13 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0112%13 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0217%13 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0319%13 Jun
nuke13–110.0320%12 Jun
ancient5–130.0139%12 Jun
mirage13–40.0112%12 Jun
cache13–5-0.0212%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →