45H

45H — CS2 Stats

GB76561197960345026[U:1:79298]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,377Tracked matches57%Win rate2022Tracked since
1,533Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidOpening Duellist
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,339 -122 2 May – 8 May · 2 days played
17,33917,461peak 17,4612 May8 May
17,461Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,528Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,528
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 3 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches17——
Win rate65%——
K/D0.99——
Headshot %58%——

Measured 18 Sep 2026 → 17 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,220), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate45.9%45.7%46.8%0.9% short
Shot accuracy14.0%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.131.051.06above
Match win rate46.4%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG45HFACEITLevel 7 · 1,528 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,528csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning72
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–48–1Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 508ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 13–7 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 543ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Opening Duellist — Winning opening duels is what stands out in this profile (+1.4 against its own average). How often you WIN the first duel — CSDB cannot yet see how often you take it.

Aim6.9
Utility4.7
Positioning7.2
Opening Duels7.4
Clutch4.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 48% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning7.2
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels6.5
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time570ms−31ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy18.2%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–8 · inferno, 22 Feb →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Jun →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · inferno, 20 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 7 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
11–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 71% over 17anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA1810–856%0.01
nukeS1712–571%-0.01
mirageB168–850%0.03
dust2B157–847%0.00
cacheA127–558%0.02
ancientC125–742%-0.02
anubisD71–614%-0.00
overpass—31–233%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

72,974Lifetime kills
1.13K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
2,392Matches
46.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
45.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
14.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
6,367MVPs
1,533Hours (in match)
4,183Bombs planted
1,035Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4721,526
AWP8,578
P2503,716
Knife1,273
MP71,010

Lifetime map wins

6,518dust2
6,044inferno
4,368nuke
1,021vertigo
792train
49aztec
27italy
16office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,230Matches
50%Win rate
1.10Avg K/D
80.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage19348%1.1515.9
Dust212245%1.1217.0
Inferno11756%1.1316.2
Nuke9858%1.0416.0
Anubis9344%0.9815.3
Ancient8050%1.0215.5
Cache2650%1.1317.3
Vertigo2528%0.9815.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
48.1%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.76HE damage / grenade
5.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3964 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.0326%14 Oct →
mirage13–30.0517%12 Oct →
cache13–50.0123%12 Oct →
inferno13–0-0.0411%7 Oct →
nuke16–14-0.0220%5 Oct →
ancient13–110.0323%4 Oct →
mirage11–130.0718%13 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.039%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0421%1 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0314%26 Aug →
inferno13–50.0512%19 Aug →
nuke13–10.0316%19 Aug →
mirage13–80.0420%17 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0414%16 Aug →
inferno11–130.0216%29 Jul →
nuke10–130.0415%29 Jul →
dust213–1-0.0117%26 Jul →
cache14–160.0614%22 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0117%20 Jul →
ancient6–130.0323%13 Jul →
nuke13–10-0.0318%8 Jul →
nuke13–90.0127%7 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.1111%5 Jul →
dust213–110.0514%5 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0124%4 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0112%29 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0216%25 Jun →
anubis5–13-0.0116%24 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0433%22 Jun →
dust211–130.0928%21 Jun →
inferno13–16-0.0020%20 Jun →
cache13–50.0922%20 Jun →
mirage13–110.0518%18 Jun →
nuke13–110.0323%14 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0318%14 Jun →
cache13–11-0.0413%13 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0317%13 Jun →
anubis11–130.0521%12 Jun →
dust216–13-0.0119%7 Jun →
dust213–70.0213%6 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0224%6 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.0315%1 Jun →
inferno8–13-0.0120%1 Jun →
nuke13–50.0744%1 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0627%31 May →
dust213–8-0.0426%31 May →
mirage11–130.0421%31 May →
mirage13–90.0711%31 May →
nuke13–9-0.0222%31 May →
ancient5–13-0.0720%31 May →
inferno9–13-0.0215%31 May →
overpass1–13-0.0729%31 May →
nuke15–150.0119%30 May →
dust213–160.0621%30 May →
ancient3–13-0.1517%30 May →
inferno10–130.0528%27 May →
cache13–90.0420%27 May →
ancient13–5-0.0315%27 May →
inferno13–110.0317%27 May →
cache11–130.0224%24 May →
mirage13–8-0.0020%21 May →
nuke10–13-0.0130%21 May →
mirage7–13-0.047%21 May →
inferno10–130.0420%16 May →
mirage16–19-0.0317%15 May →
nuke13–4-0.0010%13 May →
dust213–80.0421%11 May →
mirage7–13-0.0418%9 May →
nuke13–10-0.0617%9 May →
cache7–13-0.0336%9 May →
ancient7–13-0.0316%9 May →
mirage8–130.0718%8 May →
cache7–130.0121%7 May →
cache13–100.0930%7 May →
inferno13–20.0919%7 May →
cache9–13-0.0119%7 May →
ancient10–130.0518%4 May →
overpass9–130.0522%4 May →
mirage13–60.1017%4 May →
inferno16–12-0.0319%4 May →
nuke13–90.0128%4 May →
cache13–11-0.0228%3 May →
ancient16–140.0030%2 May →
anubis5–130.0316%2 May →
ancient13–8-0.0022%25 Apr →
mirage3–130.0311%24 Apr →
anubis13–110.0010%24 Apr →
overpass13–40.0718%24 Apr →
ancient8–13-0.0119%24 Apr →
mirage13–70.0325%24 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0331%20 Apr →
inferno9–130.0118%17 Apr →
mirage13–00.0425%17 Apr →
ancient13–6-0.0118%17 Apr →
nuke5–13-0.0533%17 Apr →
dust213–5-0.0215%14 Apr →
dust29–130.0121%31 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0415%30 Mar →
inferno13–80.1224%22 Feb →
anubis14–16-0.046%1 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.