scheibe

scheibe — CS2 Stats

DE76561197960342758[U:1:77030]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,201Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,303Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,238Top 10% of 212,133 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19192 of 259041 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,238 +239 19 Sept – 29 Oct · 19 days played
24,27825,635peak 25,63519 Sept29 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,306 +0 31 Aug – 20 Sept · 5 observations
2,3062,306peak 2,30631 Aug20 Sept
25,749Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,306Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2025-09-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 397 below peak (25,635)
  • +582 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,762 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate52.0%48.2%50.9%above
Shot accuracy19.3%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.071.090.07 short
Match win rate41.9%46.9%48.4%6.5% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGscheibeFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,238 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,306csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning41
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–44–1Last 10055%Win rateTWLLLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · +83ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–3–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 717ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 20

  • 8–11–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.2
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.4
Clutch4.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.1
Utility5.2
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time637ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 678ms → last ⅓ avg 637ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 2 Sept →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 26 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 2–13 · nuke, 3 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 26 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3318–1555%-0.01
cacheS139–469%-0.01
infernoA138–562%-0.03
ancientA127–558%-0.03
anubisD103–730%-0.02
nukeA95–456%-0.03
overpassA53–260%-0.02
mirage—41–325%-0.02
vertigo—11–0100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,290Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
4,465Matches
41.9%Match win rate
52.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
19.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 9 players
10,168MVPs
3,051Hours (in match)
4,076Bombs planted
1,388Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,081
AWP10,509
Knife2,276
FAMAS2,112
MP92,003

Lifetime map wins

8,833inferno
7,800dust2
4,493vertigo
4,409nuke
2,352train
117cbble
32lake
24safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,293Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
73.9ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis14554%1.0115.6
Dust213253%0.8814.7
Ancient12542%0.9014.6
Inferno9451%1.0015.1
Nuke7650%0.9515.4
Mirage4146%1.0715.4
Overpass3672%1.0915.7
Train3554%0.9213.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
40.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.7%Spray accuracy
85.7%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
636msReaction time
39.9%T opening success
27.2%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
3.9%Flash assists
11.42HE damage / grenade
9.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4982 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.882% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust215–15-0.0234%29 Oct →
cache13–7-0.0323%28 Oct →
dust210–130.0130%28 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0517%28 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0343%26 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0023%26 Oct →
dust213–110.0420%19 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0418%18 Oct →
cache13–3-0.0117%18 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0114%18 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0621%18 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.0623%15 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0315%15 Oct →
dust213–30.0116%15 Oct →
dust213–30.0421%15 Oct →
dust28–130.0221%15 Oct →
anubis13–90.1322%2 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0220%2 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0224%31 Aug →
dust27–130.0124%28 Aug →
anubis13–40.008%28 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0419%28 Aug →
nuke13–40.0111%28 Aug →
dust213–30.0119%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0311%27 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0321%27 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0613%27 Aug →
ancient9–130.0117%27 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0711%27 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0417%26 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0615%26 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0019%26 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0617%26 Aug →
dust220–22-0.0232%24 Aug →
mirage13–60.0114%24 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0430%23 Aug →
ancient2–11-0.0331%23 Aug →
inferno7–13-0.0510%20 Aug →
dust213–60.0219%20 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.019%20 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0616%19 Aug →
vertigo13–80.0118%18 Aug →
cache13–11-0.0127%17 Aug →
inferno13–4-0.0023%17 Aug →
ancient16–12-0.0724%16 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0829%16 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0130%15 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0218%14 Aug →
nuke13–70.0026%14 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0312%7 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0115%7 Aug →
cache13–80.0311%7 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1227%3 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0414%3 Aug →
inferno5–13-0.074%27 Jul →
anubis8–13-0.0324%25 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0417%25 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0025%22 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0122%22 Jul →
ancient8–130.0025%22 Jul →
cache13–3-0.0627%22 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0015%18 Jul →
cache13–50.0630%10 Jul →
dust214–16-0.0911%1 Jul →
mirage9–13-0.0215%1 Jul →
dust211–130.0120%1 Jul →
cache10–130.0229%1 Jul →
ancient16–13-0.0117%24 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.1310%9 Jun →
inferno13–9-0.0713%1 Jun →
ancient13–7-0.0312%1 Jun →
dust213–110.0114%1 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0723%27 May →
inferno13–11-0.026%22 May →
dust216–14-0.0320%22 May →
ancient9–130.0127%22 May →
anubis10–13-0.0414%20 May →
dust213–100.0227%20 May →
dust213–7-0.0017%19 May →
overpass2–13-0.0814%14 May →
cache13–8-0.0114%11 May →
inferno14–16-0.0215%9 May →
dust213–80.0514%9 May →
overpass13–100.0016%8 May →
overpass12–16-0.0712%1 May →
dust219–16-0.0415%26 Apr →
dust213–2-0.0414%26 Apr →
nuke13–9-0.0017%26 Apr →
anubis11–13-0.059%9 Nov →
inferno12–16-0.0427%30 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0120%30 Sept →
overpass13–30.0413%21 Sept →
ancient13–100.0211%21 Sept →
overpass13–90.0117%19 Sept →
dust213–60.0117%19 Sept →
inferno13–40.0326%19 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0218%19 Sept →
nuke0–13-0.0317%19 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0023%19 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0728%16 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.