r33n

r33n — CS2 Stats

DE76561197960332221[U:1:66493]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,410Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,338Hours in CS23Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,352Top 50% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#65331 of 259623 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,563 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−348Premier CS Rating · 21,700 → 21,352

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,352 +978 14 Sept – 3 Nov · 31 days played
19,99421,971peak 21,97114 Sept3 Nov
22,122Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,563Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-09-14

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,563
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 188 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 619 below peak (21,971)
  • +1,054 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,648 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate56.0%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy8.9%12.7%13.0%4.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.051.060.13 short
Match win rate45.7%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGr33nFACEITLevel 7 · 1,563 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,352 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,563csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning56
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–40–9Last 10051%Win rateLLLTLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 604ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.9
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.6
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time610ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 610ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 8–4 · rush_001, 8 Oct →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · inferno, 22 Oct →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 21 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 17 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2313–1057%0.02
dust2A1810–856%0.01
ancientC176–1135%-0.01
anubisB157–847%-0.01
cacheS96–367%-0.01
mirageS86–275%-0.01
nukeD60–60%-0.02
rush_001—22–0100%0.07
overpass—11–0100%0.06
vertigo—10–10%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,570Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,564Matches
45.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
56.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
8.9%Shot accuracy
10,018MVPs
2,240Hours (in match)
5,224Bombs planted
951Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,583
AWP6,898
FAMAS3,136
MP71,432
MAC-101,261

Lifetime map wins

10,376dust2
9,306inferno
3,364nuke
1,163train
701vertigo
585cbble
108lake
70dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

539Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
77.6ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust26856%1.0615.4
Ancient6638%0.9314.4
Inferno3949%0.9314.8
Mirage3447%1.0215.4
Anubis3161%0.9514.4
Train1457%0.9616.1
Overpass862%0.9013.0
Cache743%1.0020.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
84.5%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
608msReaction time
47.8%T opening success
56.2%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
6.2%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
13.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–13-0.0219%3 Nov →
dust29–130.0228%3 Nov →
ancient4–13-0.0625%2 Nov →
inferno8–8-0.1023%2 Nov →
cache10–13-0.0613%2 Nov →
anubis9–20.0623%2 Nov →
ancient13–60.0024%2 Nov →
ancient3–13-0.0038%30 Oct →
anubis13–2-0.0220%29 Oct →
mirage13–90.0428%29 Oct →
cache13–110.0229%28 Oct →
inferno8–130.0322%28 Oct →
mirage13–50.0226%27 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0221%27 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0223%27 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0626%27 Oct →
ancient4–130.0123%27 Oct →
anubis8–130.0028%26 Oct →
dust213–80.0320%26 Oct →
dust216–140.0320%26 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0118%26 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0719%25 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.036%23 Oct →
inferno13–60.0443%22 Oct →
dust213–100.0024%22 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0122%22 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0324%21 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0517%21 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0226%21 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0626%21 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0321%17 Oct →
inferno15–150.0123%17 Oct →
mirage9–130.0324%17 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0025%17 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0025%17 Oct →
inferno13–40.0639%16 Oct →
inferno9–130.0524%16 Oct →
mirage12–80.0031%16 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0328%9 Oct →
cache13–80.0129%8 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0519%8 Oct →
inferno11–130.0429%8 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0122%8 Oct →
rush_0018–50.0422%8 Oct →
rush_0018–40.1025%8 Oct →
nuke15–150.0333%7 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0518%7 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0317%7 Oct →
inferno13–6-0.0014%7 Oct →
inferno11–130.0127%2 Oct →
dust213–100.0223%29 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0812%29 Sept →
inferno15–15-0.0225%29 Sept →
cache10–13-0.078%29 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0020%28 Sept →
anubis13–90.0019%28 Sept →
ancient15–150.0421%28 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0822%27 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0328%27 Sept →
dust25–130.0228%27 Sept →
anubis15–150.0225%26 Sept →
ancient13–30.0616%26 Sept →
dust26–130.0631%26 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0221%25 Sept →
inferno13–30.0628%25 Sept →
cache16–13-0.0327%22 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0318%22 Sept →
anubis10–130.0314%22 Sept →
inferno13–60.1015%22 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0138%22 Sept →
dust28–20.0428%22 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0325%21 Sept →
ancient8–130.0620%21 Sept →
dust213–60.0333%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0220%21 Sept →
cache8–00.0729%21 Sept →
inferno13–60.1015%21 Sept →
inferno8–130.0521%20 Sept →
anubis8–130.0231%20 Sept →
inferno13–60.0427%20 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0621%20 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0228%20 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0017%19 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0516%19 Sept →
overpass9–30.0632%19 Sept →
vertigo5–90.0339%19 Sept →
ancient13–5-0.0425%18 Sept →
inferno16–120.0633%17 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0122%17 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0120%17 Sept →
inferno13–00.0415%17 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0730%17 Sept →
dust213–60.0436%16 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0030%16 Sept →
ancient15–15-0.0416%15 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0029%15 Sept →
inferno8–130.0520%15 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0132%14 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.0321%14 Sept →
inferno13–10.0330%14 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.