kelmstr

kelmstr — CS2 Stats

76561197960326025[U:1:60297]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

785Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,693Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,399 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (44 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,399 → 1,399
+31Tracked matches · now 785
−6.7ppWin rate · 60.0% → 53.3%

Rating over time

1,399Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
49Days played since 2026-02-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,399
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 132 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-20
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-20

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.3%46.8%48.2%1.9% short
Shot accuracy20.7%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.291.061.07above
Match win rate26.6%46.3%46.9%20.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkelmstrFACEITLevel 8 · 1,399 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,399csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning74
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +61ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–5 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.9
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels5.7
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning7.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time502ms−80ms
first ⅓ avg 582ms → last ⅓ avg 502ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 26 Sept →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · anubis, 12 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 9 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · anubis, 27 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L5Current streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 62% over 21dust2Weakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2314–961%0.02
nukeA2113–862%0.03
ancientB199–1047%0.02
infernoA148–657%0.01
cacheA95–456%0.00
overpassA74–357%0.02
dust2D51–420%-0.04
mirage—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

177,189Lifetime kills
1.29K/D · Top 25% of Level 8 players
5,140Matches
26.6%Match win rate
46.3%Headshot %
20.7%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 8 players
6,566MVPs
1,882Hours (in match)
3,445Bombs planted
582Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4768,756
AWP13,583
P2508,044
FAMAS3,979
Tec-92,961

Lifetime map wins

4,074dust2
4,041inferno
3,480nuke
1,347train
856cbble
697vertigo
182dust
104office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

402Matches
50%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
82.9ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient7049%1.1917.8
Nuke6752%1.1416.1
Anubis5855%1.2617.8
Inferno4755%1.1016.5
Overpass2962%1.2818.2
Dust2157%0.8212.5
Train1136%1.5316.8
Cache944%1.2416.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.6%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
516msReaction time
49.0%T opening success
61.4%CT opening success
0.50Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.55HE damage / grenade
9.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4998 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0612%23 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0215%21 Oct →
anubis16–190.0519%21 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0218%14 Oct →
nuke13–160.0216%14 Oct →
anubis13–60.1310%14 Oct →
ancient7–130.0213%9 Oct →
cache13–100.0429%9 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0321%9 Oct →
inferno7–130.0315%9 Oct →
ancient13–50.0110%7 Oct →
inferno13–100.0415%2 Oct →
anubis16–130.0016%2 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0621%2 Oct →
nuke13–70.0621%30 Sept →
dust21–2-0.090%30 Sept →
inferno13–70.0123%27 Sept →
ancient13–50.2017%26 Sept →
ancient1–130.007%23 Sept →
cache8–130.0415%23 Sept →
cache13–4-0.0319%23 Sept →
ancient19–220.1018%22 Sept →
cache13–50.1114%22 Sept →
nuke16–130.0715%20 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0222%16 Sept →
anubis13–70.0214%16 Sept →
ancient19–160.0919%13 Sept →
nuke13–90.013%13 Sept →
inferno13–40.026%12 Sept →
ancient9–130.0316%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0121%11 Sept →
dust29–13-0.048%11 Sept →
dust213–60.019%9 Sept →
nuke13–110.0520%9 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0313%9 Sept →
inferno8–130.0023%5 Sept →
inferno16–140.0015%2 Sept →
ancient9–130.0112%2 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0117%27 Aug →
anubis13–20.0112%27 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.049%26 Aug →
anubis13–100.0312%26 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0510%19 Aug →
inferno13–100.1020%19 Aug →
anubis13–30.0418%18 Aug →
anubis13–100.0321%13 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0326%31 Jul →
dust29–13-0.0121%31 Jul →
nuke16–120.0314%24 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0314%18 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0520%18 Jul →
anubis13–90.019%18 Jul →
cache13–16-0.0311%17 Jul →
anubis13–60.0914%17 Jul →
anubis8–40.0219%17 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0314%9 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0017%12 Jun →
overpass14–160.0517%12 Jun →
overpass13–9-0.0116%12 Jun →
nuke12–20.0710%12 Jun →
inferno13–100.0229%12 Jun →
anubis13–60.1134%12 Jun →
ancient14–160.0210%3 Jun →
ancient3–13-0.0910%29 May →
anubis5–13-0.0017%29 May →
overpass13–110.0811%15 May →
overpass13–80.0116%9 May →
nuke13–90.0317%9 May →
nuke10–13-0.0026%9 May →
ancient13–50.1114%9 May →
ancient13–10-0.0512%5 May →
nuke8–130.0115%22 Apr →
inferno3–13-0.0414%22 Apr →
anubis13–30.0117%22 Apr →
anubis11–130.0315%8 Apr →
ancient13–80.0614%8 Apr →
overpass11–130.0421%8 Apr →
nuke7–130.0621%5 Apr →
inferno10–130.0215%5 Apr →
anubis9–13-0.0013%5 Apr →
anubis12–16-0.0121%3 Apr →
anubis13–110.0414%3 Apr →
overpass13–110.0220%30 Mar →
nuke8–130.018%30 Mar →
ancient13–70.0314%30 Mar →
nuke13–100.0816%27 Mar →
nuke12–160.0015%24 Mar →
nuke13–90.0128%14 Mar →
ancient19–170.0210%14 Mar →
inferno13–30.0830%14 Mar →
nuke13–90.0017%14 Mar →
nuke14–160.0814%6 Mar →
anubis11–13-0.0115%6 Mar →
anubis7–13-0.0011%4 Mar →
nuke13–11-0.0015%27 Feb →
ancient13–20.0217%16 Feb →
inferno3–13-0.0617%11 Feb →
overpass5–13-0.048%3 Feb →
anubis13–9-0.0313%3 Feb →
nuke13–50.0117%3 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.