LES EFX

LES EFX — CS2 Stats

LV76561197960280361[U:1:14633]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

3,226Tracked matches24%Win rate2021Tracked since
3,975Hours in CS58Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating17,031Purple band · top ~20.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,031 -2,444 30 Aug – 25 Oct · 11 days played
15,32420,556peak 20,55630 Aug25 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,405 +0 30 Aug – 19 Sept · 3 observations
1,4051,405peak 1,40530 Aug19 Sept
20,818Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,405Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
8Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,525 below peak (20,556)
  • -1,941 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 2,969 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate40.9%46.8%48.2%7.3% short
Shot accuracy8.2%13.0%13.2%5.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.061.07meets
Match win rate44.2%46.3%46.9%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLES EFXFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER17,031 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,405csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning55
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD43–54–3Last 10043%Win rateTLLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −0.0pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 0–4–1 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 469ms

Last 10

  • 2–7–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 439ms

Last 20

  • 4–15–1 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 440ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.3
Utility4.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning5.5
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time441ms−45ms
first ⅓ avg 486ms → last ⅓ avg 441ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 9 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · dust2, 24 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 23 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 17 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7mirageWeakest map · 17% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC219–1243%0.05
dust2B189–950%0.04
mirageD183–1517%0.02
infernoB136–746%0.05
nukeB126–650%0.04
anubisB115–645%0.05
ancientS75–271%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 18). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

92,446Lifetime kills
1.06K/D
4,805Matches
44.2%Match win rate
40.9%Headshot %
8.2%Shot accuracy
9,848MVPs
2,189Hours (in match)
2,983Bombs planted
1,155Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,424
AWP21,974
SSG 085,347
MP92,034
FAMAS1,562

Lifetime map wins

17,889dust2
6,544inferno
4,773nuke
1,765vertigo
580train
246office
61cbble
30italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

606Matches
49%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
89.4ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust211949%1.4918.8
Anubis8551%1.3518.3
Inferno7846%1.2416.7
Mirage7647%1.3616.7
Nuke5457%1.2516.4
Ancient4347%1.1916.7
Vertigo1942%1.0916.2
Overpass1145%1.1019.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
41.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.9%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
4.9°Preaim
442msReaction time
41.9%T opening success
52.2%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
8.13HE damage / grenade
6.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4014 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno15–150.0221%25 Oct →
cache3–130.0227%25 Oct →
dust211–130.0213%25 Oct →
inferno5–130.0726%24 Oct →
nuke2–130.016%24 Oct →
anubis10–130.0215%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0021%24 Oct →
ancient13–80.0317%24 Oct →
ancient16–130.0710%24 Oct →
dust26–130.0312%24 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.014%24 Oct →
anubis6–130.0216%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0416%24 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0118%24 Oct →
dust213–100.0622%24 Oct →
anubis8–130.0112%24 Oct →
cache4–130.0923%24 Oct →
dust25–130.0116%24 Oct →
mirage5–130.089%24 Oct →
dust213–110.0332%24 Oct →
cache11–130.039%24 Oct →
ancient13–110.1414%24 Oct →
dust29–130.0626%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0412%24 Oct →
mirage8–130.0314%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0613%24 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0123%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.0524%24 Oct →
nuke9–130.0212%24 Oct →
mirage10–130.088%23 Oct →
ancient13–70.0912%23 Oct →
mirage13–70.0617%23 Oct →
inferno13–70.0729%23 Oct →
ancient4–130.0412%23 Oct →
cache11–130.1117%23 Oct →
mirage11–130.0631%23 Oct →
nuke11–130.0916%17 Oct →
nuke13–110.0118%17 Oct →
dust213–100.0022%17 Oct →
nuke6–130.0115%17 Oct →
dust216–190.0811%17 Oct →
dust28–130.0119%17 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0211%17 Oct →
nuke13–60.0823%17 Oct →
cache11–130.0011%17 Oct →
anubis13–40.073%17 Oct →
inferno13–80.0616%17 Oct →
inferno13–80.0613%17 Oct →
inferno13–10.129%17 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.1013%17 Oct →
cache9–2-0.018%17 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0114%17 Oct →
dust213–10.098%17 Oct →
anubis13–100.0210%17 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0114%17 Oct →
cache9–13-0.019%17 Oct →
nuke16–140.1222%17 Oct →
anubis13–110.0212%17 Oct →
dust213–90.0718%16 Oct →
nuke13–30.0711%16 Oct →
dust213–40.1024%16 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0014%16 Oct →
dust213–80.0220%16 Oct →
cache13–50.1225%16 Oct →
nuke13–40.0311%16 Oct →
inferno13–40.1213%16 Oct →
dust213–100.0212%16 Oct →
dust29–130.0517%10 Oct →
mirage9–130.0230%10 Oct →
mirage5–130.0110%10 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0011%10 Oct →
mirage5–130.0112%10 Oct →
cache16–140.1210%10 Oct →
mirage3–130.0218%10 Oct →
anubis6–130.1318%10 Oct →
cache15–150.0712%10 Oct →
anubis13–20.0720%10 Oct →
ancient5–130.0522%10 Oct →
cache13–30.0619%10 Oct →
cache13–40.038%10 Oct →
cache5–130.0424%10 Oct →
nuke15–150.0913%10 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0121%10 Oct →
dust213–70.0721%9 Oct →
inferno11–130.0618%9 Oct →
mirage11–130.0110%9 Oct →
inferno11–130.0716%9 Oct →
anubis13–20.2324%9 Oct →
cache11–130.109%9 Oct →
dust210–130.0725%9 Oct →
cache13–60.0317%9 Oct →
nuke14–160.0115%9 Oct →
anubis9–130.0116%9 Oct →
cache5–130.1015%3 Oct →
ancient13–70.1413%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0310%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.0116%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.0111%3 Oct →
cache13–40.1513%3 Oct →
inferno3–130.0011%3 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.