BBYESFREAK — CS2 Stats

76561199884774159[U:1:1924508431]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

162Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingAll-Rounder

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+2Tracked matches · now 162

−3.5ppWin rate · 48.3% → 44.8%

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 26 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

50Days played since 2025-12-26

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim60

Positioning60

Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD59–33–8Last 10059%Win rateLLLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

1–4 · 20% win rate
Avg rating -0.03
Avg headshot accuracy 16%
Avg reaction 658ms

Last 10

3–7 · 30% win rate
Avg rating -0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 19%
Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

8–12 · 40% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 18%
Avg reaction 648ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim6.0

Utility5.0

Positioning6.0

Opening Duels5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like ZywOo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0

Positioning6.0

Utility5.0

Mechanics5.6

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time659ms+23ms

first ⅓ avg 636ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms

Headshot accuracy20.4%+2.1%

first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–0 · overpass, 22 Jan →

55%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · nuke, 1 Apr →

406msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 5 Jan →

13–0Biggest win · cache, 26 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

11Longest win streak

L4Current streak

9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 83% over 12cacheWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	22	16–6	73%	0.02
nuke	A	15	9–6	60%	0.00
vertigo	S	12	10–2	83%	0.01
anubis	B	11	5–6	45%	0.03
inferno	A	11	7–4	64%	0.01
cache	D	6	2–4	33%	0.02
dust2	B	6	3–3	50%	0.01
overpass	D	6	2–4	33%	0.04
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	-0.02
office	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy

32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

75.3%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

654msReaction time

35.4%T opening success

58.1%CT opening success

0.50Enemies flashed / flash

9.2%Flash assists

15.21HE damage / grenade

5.08Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4993 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 35.4171% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	0–9	-0.05	33%	17 Sept →
anubis	7–13	-0.07	8%	17 Sept →
cache	4–13	-0.03	15%	3 Sept →
vertigo	11–13	-0.01	16%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–2	0.02	5%	3 Sept →
mirage	13–1	-0.01	33%	1 Sept →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	27%	1 Sept →
inferno	7–9	0.03	16%	26 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.01	20%	26 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	15%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.11	27%	22 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.05	19%	19 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	22%	10 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	15%	10 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	3%	10 Aug →
overpass	7–13	-0.05	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.06	21%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.07	17%	9 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	0.07	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	12–12	0.02	20%	23 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.03	41%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.04	12%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	27%	19 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	0.05	19%	19 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.06	30%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.12	29%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.04	22%	8 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.00	32%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.03	19%	25 Jun →
anubis	10–13	0.13	20%	23 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	21%	14 Jun →
dust2	12–6	0.00	24%	14 Jun →
anubis	11–13	-0.03	22%	13 Jun →
nuke	13–11	0.01	25%	28 May →
anubis	13–11	0.08	24%	28 May →
inferno	9–5	0.05	23%	26 May →
overpass	12–12	0.01	20%	26 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	21%	26 May →
ancient	5–9	-0.11	21%	26 May →
mirage	7–6	-0.06	19%	26 May →
anubis	11–13	0.02	18%	18 May →
office	5–13	0.02	39%	18 May →
nuke	16–13	-0.03	23%	11 May →
cache	13–4	0.09	22%	11 May →
cache	12–12	0.02	33%	11 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	25%	5 May →
nuke	13–7	0.01	24%	5 May →
ancient	12–12	0.03	40%	27 Apr →
dust2	13–0	0.13	18%	27 Apr →
mirage	13–9	0.05	30%	26 Apr →
inferno	13–4	0.06	18%	24 Apr →
vertigo	13–8	-0.01	10%	21 Apr →
vertigo	13–7	0.01	25%	14 Apr →
vertigo	13–3	-0.01	32%	14 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.03	16%	7 Apr →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	55%	1 Apr →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	13%	1 Apr →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	20%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–2	0.19	24%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–11	0.02	25%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.09	31%	24 Mar →
office	13–5	0.08	21%	24 Mar →
office	9–13	-0.01	12%	24 Mar →
overpass	12–12	-0.03	14%	12 Mar →
overpass	13–4	0.01	31%	12 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	16%	10 Mar →
nuke	7–13	-0.03	13%	10 Mar →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	8%	10 Mar →
inferno	13–11	0.01	32%	5 Mar →
vertigo	13–11	0.08	34%	5 Mar →
inferno	13–4	0.07	23%	5 Mar →
overpass	6–13	0.09	25%	5 Mar →
vertigo	7–13	-0.02	25%	2 Mar →
anubis	3–13	-0.03	16%	27 Feb →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	22%	27 Feb →
mirage	12–12	0.01	20%	24 Feb →
mirage	13–5	-0.05	9%	24 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.07	15%	19 Feb →
vertigo	13–4	-0.02	11%	19 Feb →
inferno	12–12	-0.05	0%	19 Feb →
ancient	13–5	-0.05	21%	19 Feb →
inferno	12–12	0.03	16%	19 Feb →
vertigo	13–7	-0.05	15%	16 Feb →
vertigo	13–4	0.01	21%	16 Feb →
anubis	13–7	0.02	17%	10 Feb →
anubis	13–4	0.11	18%	10 Feb →
ancient	13–1	0.03	8%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–5	-0.01	22%	1 Feb →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	17%	1 Feb →
poseidon	9–6	0.11	19%	22 Jan →
office	13–0	0.01	12%	22 Jan →
overpass	13–0	0.23	13%	22 Jan →
mirage	13–3	0.07	15%	12 Jan →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	37%	7 Jan →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	9%	5 Jan →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	17%	3 Jan →
anubis	13–6	0.04	19%	3 Jan →
mirage	13–5	0.04	32%	30 Dec →
anubis	13–2	0.07	22%	26 Dec →