| 13#D | Esport- ICEBLØOD |

| 13#D | Esport- ICEBLØOD | — CS2 Stats

HU76561199858441471[U:1:1898175743]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

883Tracked matches38%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,106Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating5,580Light Blue band · top ~76% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3 · 848 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 24 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 5,580 -1,996 24 Jul16 Sept · 30 days played
4,6138,219peak 8,21924 Jul16 Sept
8,219Peak Premier in tracked matches
848Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 848
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 53 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,639 below peak (8,219)
  • +88 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 4,420 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches104+6
Win rate60%25%+35pp
K/D1.121.02+0.09
Headshot %43%37%+6pp

Measured 10 Sep 202619 Sep 2026; previous 5 Sep 2026 → 10 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,862), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate36.2%41.9%42.7%6.5% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.2%11.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.940.981.000.05 short
Match win rate39.6%43.3%43.9%4.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 4 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG| 13#D | Esport- ICEBLØOD…FACEITLevel 3 · 848 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER5,580 · Light Blue bandPEAK ELO848csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning57
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY38566Last 10038%Win rateWWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 537ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility4.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 87% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 40% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 583ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning5.7
Utility4.3
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels4.7
Win Impact1.0

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time582ms−91ms
first ⅓ avg 673ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 11 Sept
30%Best headshot accuracy · 11–13 · dust2, 27 Jul
359msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · vertigo, 20 Aug
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 17 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
W2Current streak
1210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12infernoWeakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD2481633%-0.01
mirageD2171433%-0.00
ancientC1971237%-0.03
dust2D1551033%-0.00
anubisA127558%0.02
nuke43175%-0.00
cache21150%0.00
eldorado1010%0.05
vertigo1010%-0.12
train1010%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,170Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
1,334Matches
39.6%Match win rate
36.2%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,526MVPs
529Hours (in match)
1,507Bombs planted
338Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,591inferno
1,939dust2
837nuke
455train
60office
22italy
22vertigo
11dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

67Matches
39%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
66.0ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient1839%0.8312.2
Dust21242%0.9215.8
Mirage1136%0.8812.6
Inferno1060%0.8711.8
Anubis729%0.7612.1
Nuke40%0.8416.0
Train333%0.7012.3
Overpass1100%1.0813.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.4%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
68.6%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
583msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.5%Flash assists
8.64HE damage / grenade
7.56Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4455 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 39.8835% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–6-0.0014%16 Sept
anubis13–110.0316%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0610%16 Sept
mirage13–60.0723%14 Sept
inferno13–9-0.027%14 Sept
anubis14–16-0.0218%14 Sept
dust216–140.0219%11 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0030%11 Sept
mirage13–50.1222%11 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0617%4 Sept
inferno7–90.0921%4 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0713%1 Sept
inferno13–30.0119%1 Sept
anubis13–110.0313%1 Sept
anubis13–30.0121%1 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0220%27 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0415%27 Aug
inferno6–130.0221%27 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0610%27 Aug
eldorado5–90.0519%27 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0911%26 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0824%24 Aug
dust213–90.047%22 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0611%22 Aug
ancient13–16-0.069%21 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0320%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.074%20 Aug
vertigo5–13-0.128%20 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0911%20 Aug
mirage9–130.0719%20 Aug
anubis15–150.0711%19 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1125%19 Aug
dust213–6-0.0010%19 Aug
inferno13–110.0311%19 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0018%18 Aug
dust215–15-0.0129%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0310%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0012%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.038%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0317%17 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0822%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.038%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0411%17 Aug
dust213–10.0320%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0523%17 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0110%15 Aug
mirage6–130.0523%15 Aug
ancient13–110.018%13 Aug
mirage11–130.0315%13 Aug
train12–12-0.0121%10 Aug
cache13–8-0.0224%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0116%9 Aug
inferno9–130.0019%9 Aug
dust211–13-0.0222%5 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0218%5 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0321%3 Aug
nuke13–110.0811%3 Aug
anubis16–130.0627%3 Aug
mirage4–130.067%3 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0311%3 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0518%3 Aug
inferno11–13-0.086%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0410%2 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0120%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0518%1 Aug
mirage15–150.0010%31 Jul
dust213–80.0924%31 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0215%31 Jul
ancient10–130.0116%31 Jul
ancient6–130.029%30 Jul
mirage1–130.0324%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0111%30 Jul
cache10–130.0218%30 Jul
ancient13–11-0.068%30 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0222%29 Jul
dust28–13-0.0119%29 Jul
inferno8–80.0318%29 Jul
inferno9–50.0426%29 Jul
inferno5–13-0.027%28 Jul
anubis16–120.0420%28 Jul
inferno13–90.0313%28 Jul
dust212–16-0.0218%28 Jul
ancient6–13-0.077%28 Jul
ancient13–16-0.047%27 Jul
dust22–13-0.0613%27 Jul
dust20–13-0.0327%27 Jul
dust211–13-0.0630%27 Jul
mirage13–90.0311%26 Jul
ancient13–110.0720%26 Jul
inferno3–13-0.078%26 Jul
dust20–13-0.040%26 Jul
inferno13–30.0719%25 Jul
anubis13–70.0013%25 Jul
ancient13–70.0227%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.026%25 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0714%24 Jul
dust25–130.0118%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.045%24 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0523%24 Jul
inferno13–80.0917%24 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →