C0rdyx

C0rdyx — CS2 Stats

US76561199851738318[U:1:1891472590]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

414Tracked matches48%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,475Blue band · top ~36.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,040 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGC0rdyxFACEITLevel 6 · 1,040 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER13,475 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning55
Utility43

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateWWLLWLTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 492ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.3
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning5.5
Utility4.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.9
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time557ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 546ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy23.5%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 26.6% → last ⅓ avg 23.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 11–1 · dust2, 24 Oct →
55%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · dust2, 14 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 2–7 · dust2, 15 Sept →
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 3 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
3–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 15dust2Weakest map · 34% over 29
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB4524–2153%0.03
dust2D2910–1934%-0.00
infernoA159–660%0.04
ancient—41–325%0.05
anubis—21–150%-0.03
nuke—21–150%0.09
office—21–150%-0.04
overpass—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (34% over 29). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

191Matches
51%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
71.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9645%1.0514.8
Inferno2959%1.4313.8
Dust22955%0.9915.2
Anubis1354%1.2914.0
Ancient1267%1.1215.7
Nuke1050%0.8612.6
Overpass10%1.2719.0
Cache1100%1.0010.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
33.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.3%Spray accuracy
74.0%Counter-strafing
7.2°Preaim
556msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
55.5%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
9.30HE damage / grenade
7.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4553 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.413% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

34% win rate across 29 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–3-0.0026%14 Nov →
mirage13–60.0613%11 Nov →
mirage4–13-0.0529%11 Nov →
nuke11–130.0715%9 Nov →
nuke13–80.1111%9 Nov →
mirage0–11-0.059%7 Nov →
mirage12–12-0.0037%4 Nov →
mirage13–90.0217%4 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0018%3 Nov →
dust213–110.0223%1 Nov →
mirage13–50.0323%1 Nov →
inferno9–10.0622%31 Oct →
inferno13–100.1228%31 Oct →
mirage13–60.0111%30 Oct →
inferno8–130.0013%30 Oct →
mirage13–80.0622%30 Oct →
mirage10–130.1019%30 Oct →
overpass9–5-0.0313%30 Oct →
dust26–130.0120%28 Oct →
dust29–130.0123%26 Oct →
mirage4–130.1016%26 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0532%26 Oct →
mirage13–40.0544%26 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0125%25 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0129%24 Oct →
dust211–10.2130%24 Oct →
inferno9–130.0624%24 Oct →
mirage7–130.0234%24 Oct →
inferno13–70.0326%24 Oct →
mirage4–130.0441%23 Oct →
mirage13–30.0430%23 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0724%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0526%22 Oct →
ancient13–90.1125%22 Oct →
ancient9–130.0427%22 Oct →
mirage13–110.0830%22 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0432%22 Oct →
dust213–60.0344%22 Oct →
dust213–70.0131%21 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0614%21 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0425%17 Oct →
inferno13–50.1121%16 Oct →
mirage13–90.0433%16 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0321%16 Oct →
office13–6-0.0127%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0417%16 Oct →
mirage13–40.0321%15 Oct →
dust212–120.138%14 Oct →
mirage13–100.0744%14 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.0317%11 Oct →
inferno13–90.1124%11 Oct →
mirage13–30.0433%11 Oct →
ancient4–100.0323%11 Oct →
mirage13–40.1019%10 Oct →
mirage13–50.0414%10 Oct →
mirage13–40.0317%10 Oct →
mirage7–130.0210%9 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0221%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0019%8 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0124%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0714%7 Oct →
dust20–5-0.0329%3 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0527%3 Oct →
dust213–20.1532%3 Oct →
mirage11–130.0116%3 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0421%1 Oct →
inferno12–70.0038%30 Sept →
mirage13–80.0321%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0836%30 Sept →
mirage13–20.0525%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
mirage11–130.0313%26 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0520%26 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0727%25 Sept →
inferno13–50.0734%25 Sept →
mirage13–30.0437%25 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0316%25 Sept →
ancient11–130.0023%24 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0118%23 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0248%23 Sept →
dust212–12-0.0431%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0229%23 Sept →
mirage12–120.0138%23 Sept →
mirage13–100.0130%23 Sept →
mirage8–130.0725%19 Sept →
dust211–130.0311%19 Sept →
mirage13–90.1018%17 Sept →
inferno11–130.0621%17 Sept →
inferno13–60.0327%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0426%16 Sept →
mirage3–130.0127%16 Sept →
dust27–130.0640%15 Sept →
mirage5–130.0218%15 Sept →
dust22–7-0.0840%15 Sept →
dust212–120.0655%14 Sept →
mirage13–70.1937%12 Sept →
dust23–130.0011%12 Sept →
inferno11–50.0021%12 Sept →
mirage13–40.0620%12 Sept →
office9–13-0.0622%12 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.