fearnoman — CS2 Stats
76561199847491982[U:1:1887226254]Steam profile ↗
Rating over time
Faceit ELO
- At peak — 2,504
- Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 — 496 to go
- Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
- 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-28
- Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.
How this compares with the same rank
Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,109), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.
| Metric | This player | Level 9 median | Level 10 median | vs Level 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headshot rate | 69.5% | 49.0% | 52.0% | above |
| Shot accuracy | 0.0% | 13.1% | 13.7% | 13.6% short |
| Kill/death ratio | 1.07 | 1.08 | 1.08 | meets |
| Match win rate | 51.2% | 46.9% | 48.8% | above |
This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.
Share this profile
The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.
Performance scores
0–100 skill scores via Leetify.
Recent form
Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating
Player DNA
Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.
Strong CT-side opener
Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.
Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity
Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.
Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.
Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →
Strengths & areas to improve
Areas to improve
Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.
Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.
T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 19% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.
Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.
CSDB Rating breakdown
Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.
Trends
Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.
Highlights
Map breakdown
| Map | Grade | Played | Record | Win rate | Avg rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | 46 | 23–23 | 50% | -0.02 | |
| B | 19 | 9–10 | 47% | -0.00 | |
| B | 18 | 9–9 | 50% | -0.04 | |
| D | 8 | 2–6 | 25% | -0.04 | |
| — | 4 | 2–2 | 50% | -0.02 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.05 | |
| — | 2 | 1–1 | 50% | -0.06 | |
| — | 1 | 1–0 | 100% | -0.04 |
Across the last 100 tracked matches.
Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.
Lifetime stats
Most-used weapons
Lifetime map wins
Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.
Faceit stats
Combat
Clutches & streaks
Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL
| Map | Matches | Win rate | Avg K/D | Avg kills |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mirage | 344 | 55% | 0.91 | 13.4 |
| Ancient | 161 | 55% | 0.98 | 13.8 |
| Nuke | 140 | 56% | 1.03 | 14.1 |
| Dust2 | 39 | 41% | 0.85 | 12.5 |
| Inferno | 29 | 52% | 0.97 | 13.0 |
| Anubis | 24 | 33% | 0.77 | 11.9 |
| Cache | 20 | 50% | 0.76 | 11.1 |
| Overpass | 15 | 53% | 0.86 | 14.0 |
Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.
Skill profile
Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.
Recommended for you
Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.
- Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 18.976% — below the 40% mark we flag
Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.
25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.
Recent matches
| Map | Score | Rating | HS% | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4–13 | -0.08 | 5% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.11 | 9% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 26% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.01 | 33% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.07 | 28% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.08 | 45% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.08 | 30% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 0–11 | -0.05 | 36% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.06 | 22% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.04 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.08 | 14% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | -0.05 | 29% | 28 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.10 | 5% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 15–19 | -0.07 | 19% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.06 | 26% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.04 | 30% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.05 | 30% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | 0.00 | 44% | 27 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.06 | 10% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 25% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | 0.00 | 9% | 26 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | 0.00 | 42% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.01 | 29% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.05 | 23% | 24 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.10 | 33% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.10 | 24% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.03 | 10% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.07 | 25% | 23 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 24% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 44% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.04 | 18% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 39% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.07 | 16% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 23% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 23% | 21 Aug → | ||
| 16–13 | 0.02 | 20% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–16 | -0.02 | 27% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.03 | 22% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 13–3 | -0.03 | 29% | 20 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.02 | 18% | 19 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 31% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.02 | 31% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.04 | 25% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 19–16 | -0.04 | 14% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 14–16 | 0.01 | 14% | 18 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.05 | 17% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.01 | 26% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.00 | 31% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.10 | 15% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 36% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | 0.04 | 24% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 19% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.05 | 7% | 17 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.09 | 21% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 10–13 | -0.04 | 32% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | 0.01 | 28% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.06 | 26% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 12% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 16–19 | -0.04 | 18% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.06 | 18% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 12–16 | -0.09 | 14% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–4 | -0.00 | 24% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.03 | 25% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 11–13 | -0.03 | 20% | 16 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | -0.01 | 24% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.05 | 20% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.05 | 23% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.01 | 18% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.05 | 15% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.04 | 26% | 15 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.04 | 15% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.08 | 24% | 9 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.01 | 24% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | -0.01 | 20% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 25% | 8 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.04 | 25% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | -0.08 | 28% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.05 | 21% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | -0.03 | 20% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 13–5 | 0.01 | 29% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 19–17 | -0.05 | 14% | 7 Aug → | ||
| 6–13 | 0.01 | 21% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.04 | 22% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 4–13 | -0.11 | 10% | 6 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.05 | 32% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–8 | -0.08 | 35% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 9–13 | -0.01 | 23% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 3–13 | -0.07 | 0% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 2–13 | -0.07 | 26% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–7 | -0.06 | 37% | 5 Aug → | ||
| 13–6 | 0.02 | 25% | 3 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.00 | 19% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–11 | 0.06 | 23% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–9 | 0.03 | 33% | 2 Aug → | ||
| 13–10 | 0.05 | 19% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–9 | -0.01 | 17% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 7–13 | -0.05 | 27% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 5–13 | -0.05 | 19% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 13–3 | 0.12 | 28% | 31 Jul → | ||
| 8–13 | -0.01 | 28% | 30 Jul → |
Match data via Leetify.