Zul Tangan Hitam

Zul Tangan Hitam — CS2 Stats

ID76561199840530617[U:1:1880264889]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,109Tracked matches72%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,560Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating28,620Top 1% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1498 of 221743 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,172 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 10 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,620 +8,767 10 Aug16 Sept · 29 days played
19,85329,616peak 29,61610 Aug16 Sept
29,616Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,172Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,172
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 29 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-12
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-12

Premier CS Rating

  • 996 below peak (29,616)
  • +3,076 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1,380 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-12
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches4058−18
Win rate63%74%−12pp
K/D1.171.38−0.21
Headshot %46%43%+2pp

Measured 12 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 12 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=11,606), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate49.0%43.8%44.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.021.040.08 short
Match win rate50.9%44.7%45.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZul Tangan HitamFACEITLevel 5 · 1,172 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER28,620 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,172csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning64
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT71254Last 10071%Win rateWWWWLWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · +11ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 10

  • 82 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.5
Positioning6.4
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.4
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time527ms+65ms
first ⅓ avg 462ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−7.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–5 · anubis, 18 Aug
83%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · inferno, 21 Aug
266msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · anubis, 27 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 16 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

15Longest win streak
W4Current streak
101In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 92% over 12mirageWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2213959%0.04
anubisS2016480%0.05
ancientS1814478%0.04
dust2S1211192%0.03
mirageC83538%0.01
cacheS75271%-0.03
nukeS64267%0.04
train32167%0.02
vertigo21150%-0.01
overpass110100%0.07
office110100%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,044Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,374Matches
50.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 5 players
49.0%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
5,281MVPs
1,206Hours (in match)
3,793Bombs planted
468Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,670dust2
4,721inferno
1,296nuke
746train
502vertigo
59office
29italy
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
49%Win rate
0.91Avg K/D
78.5ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1753%0.8713.7
Dust21650%1.0216.7
Ancient1338%0.8814.8
Anubis967%0.7814.2
Nuke743%0.9316.3
Mirage650%0.8013.3
Train30%0.9214.3
Cache250%1.3218.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.4%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
509msReaction time
45.2%T opening success
41.9%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
5.2%Flash assists
8.98HE damage / grenade
7.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4851 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
overpass13–50.0715%17 Sept
train13–1-0.0816%16 Sept
ancient13–00.139%16 Sept
inferno13–40.1010%16 Sept
vertigo1–13-0.0124%15 Sept
cache8–1-0.0225%15 Sept
anubis13–90.0318%15 Sept
dust213–20.0119%15 Sept
ancient13–100.0620%15 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0718%14 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0021%14 Sept
nuke13–40.1326%13 Sept
cache13–4-0.0816%13 Sept
cache2–13-0.0631%12 Sept
inferno13–10-0.1117%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0223%12 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0429%12 Sept
ancient13–30.0319%11 Sept
nuke4–13-0.0627%11 Sept
dust213–60.0722%11 Sept
train12–12-0.0126%11 Sept
ancient13–30.0121%11 Sept
anubis13–20.1523%11 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0036%11 Sept
dust213–20.1518%11 Sept
inferno13–110.0716%10 Sept
anubis13–30.1014%10 Sept
inferno10–0-0.0214%10 Sept
dust213–11-0.0115%10 Sept
inferno13–70.1213%9 Sept
inferno0–13-0.0742%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0411%8 Sept
office13–70.068%7 Sept
ancient13–30.0810%7 Sept
inferno13–70.1920%7 Sept
dust213–2-0.0218%7 Sept
cache13–50.0315%6 Sept
dust213–50.0428%6 Sept
train13–10.1424%4 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0324%3 Sept
anubis13–40.1136%3 Sept
nuke13–100.0520%3 Sept
ancient13–40.0324%3 Sept
inferno13–80.1628%1 Sept
anubis13–110.0431%1 Sept
anubis13–8-0.1238%31 Aug
anubis6–130.0124%31 Aug
dust213–3-0.0114%31 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0429%30 Aug
inferno13–90.0536%30 Aug
anubis5–130.0222%27 Aug
ancient13–70.0220%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0610%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0519%26 Aug
vertigo13–4-0.0117%25 Aug
anubis9–130.0125%25 Aug
cache13–8-0.0115%25 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0412%25 Aug
ancient13–110.0518%24 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0524%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0427%24 Aug
cache2–13-0.1118%24 Aug
ancient13–110.0922%23 Aug
anubis13–80.0122%22 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0012%22 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0924%22 Aug
inferno13–80.2015%22 Aug
ancient7–130.0220%22 Aug
dust213–20.1145%22 Aug
cache13–30.0316%21 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0983%21 Aug
anubis13–90.0945%21 Aug
inferno6–130.0133%21 Aug
anubis13–70.0218%19 Aug
inferno13–90.1321%19 Aug
anubis13–100.0318%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0522%18 Aug
anubis13–50.2333%18 Aug
inferno15–150.1322%18 Aug
dust213–100.0025%17 Aug
anubis7–130.0533%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0710%16 Aug
anubis13–20.2028%16 Aug
nuke13–60.2129%16 Aug
mirage13–100.0537%15 Aug
ancient13–90.0631%15 Aug
ancient6–130.0428%13 Aug
anubis13–100.0624%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0020%12 Aug
inferno13–50.0948%12 Aug
inferno13–90.0122%12 Aug
mirage13–80.0314%12 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0218%11 Aug
dust213–110.0429%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0124%11 Aug
mirage12–120.0825%10 Aug
ancient13–70.0623%10 Aug
mirage11–130.0510%10 Aug
anubis13–90.0624%10 Aug
dust213–80.0014%10 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches15-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →