InValiD

InValiD — CS2 Stats

VI76561199829984154[U:1:1869718426]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

669Tracked matches63%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,161Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,996Top 50% of 183,637 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#50734 of 229290 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (12 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 21,996 → 21,996
0Faceit ELO · 1,284 → 1,284
+1Tracked matches · now 669
0.0ppWin rate · 63.0% → 63.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 21 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,996 +1,309 28 Jul7 Sept · 9 days played
20,58721,996peak 21,99628 Jul7 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,284 +0 6 Sept7 Sept · 2 observations
1,2841,284peak 1,2846 Sept7 Sept
21,996Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,284Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
23Days played since 2026-07-21

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,284
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 67 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 21,996
  • +486 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,004 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-06
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=36,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate56.0%46.9%49.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.3%13.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.391.081.12above
Match win rate57.8%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGInValiDPREMIER21,996 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,284csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning49
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53398Last 10053%Win rateWLLWLTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility4.9
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.9
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact9.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time567ms−21ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 567ms
Headshot accuracy21.6%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 24.7% → last ⅓ avg 21.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–5 · eldorado, 7 Aug
65%Best headshot accuracy · 10–1 · mirage, 26 Jul
188msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · eldorado, 7 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 22 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
85In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 89% over 9infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2281436%0.03
dust2A2214864%0.05
cacheS98189%0.07
anubisS86275%0.05
infernoD72529%0.04
ancientD62433%0.04
nuke42250%0.00
boulder31233%0.03
train31233%0.04
overpass330100%0.08
vertigo330100%0.10
fachwerk32167%-0.01
eldorado21150%0.09
debris2020%0.01
shelter2020%-0.02
poseidon1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

30,321Lifetime kills
1.39K/D · Top 10% of Pink band
1,354Matches
57.8%Match win rate · Top 5% of Pink band
56.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Pink band
0.0%Shot accuracy
5,388MVPs
1,860Hours (in match)
1,460Bombs planted
330Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4712,362
AWP3,305
MP9829
HE Grenade364

Lifetime map wins

2,430inferno
2,088dust2
1,417nuke
600vertigo
419train
175office
77italy
4ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

41Matches
68%Win rate
2.10Avg K/D
107.9ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
31%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1258%1.4219.9
Dust2875%4.3224.0
Inferno650%1.3422.3
Overpass5100%2.1522.0
Ancient540%1.4220.0
Nuke3100%1.6526.0
Train1100%2.7825.0
Anubis1100%1.0619.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.0%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
574msReaction time
35.2%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
13.06HE damage / grenade
3.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.4068 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.1829% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0020%10 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0613%27 Aug
boulder3–130.0015%27 Aug
cache13–80.0120%16 Aug
train10–130.0227%15 Aug
train12–12-0.0126%14 Aug
dust213–50.0635%14 Aug
mirage13–110.0959%13 Aug
dust213–90.0517%13 Aug
dust213–50.1022%12 Aug
mirage5–130.0723%10 Aug
overpass13–50.0516%8 Aug
dust213–100.0521%8 Aug
train13–80.0926%7 Aug
eldorado9–50.2448%7 Aug
debris3–9-0.0527%7 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0314%7 Aug
inferno13–70.1021%7 Aug
mirage13–40.0417%7 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0611%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0418%7 Aug
dust213–60.0618%6 Aug
dust213–70.0442%6 Aug
inferno13–110.099%6 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0615%6 Aug
dust213–90.0117%6 Aug
ancient13–60.0715%6 Aug
inferno12–120.0121%6 Aug
mirage13–100.0319%6 Aug
boulder11–130.0111%6 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0323%4 Aug
mirage15–150.0115%4 Aug
cache13–70.0416%4 Aug
debris8–80.0719%4 Aug
dust211–130.0320%4 Aug
vertigo13–100.1827%2 Aug
dust24–130.0721%2 Aug
anubis13–10-0.007%31 Jul
cache13–100.089%31 Jul
dust210–13-0.0045%29 Jul
fachwerk13–9-0.0030%29 Jul
dust213–50.0923%28 Jul
ancient13–90.0129%28 Jul
cache13–40.1332%28 Jul
inferno8–130.0122%28 Jul
mirage4–130.0627%28 Jul
cache9–130.0215%28 Jul
dust213–80.1029%28 Jul
dust25–130.0025%27 Jul
vertigo13–40.0618%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.057%27 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0313%27 Jul
mirage5–130.0418%27 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0015%27 Jul
mirage2–130.0025%26 Jul
mirage10–10.0665%26 Jul
dust213–90.0328%26 Jul
overpass13–110.0835%26 Jul
mirage12–160.0921%26 Jul
dust213–110.0629%26 Jul
fachwerk7–13-0.0320%25 Jul
anubis13–110.0125%25 Jul
dust213–60.0731%25 Jul
cache13–110.0733%25 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0245%25 Jul
inferno5–130.0435%24 Jul
nuke5–130.0150%24 Jul
dust213–90.0719%24 Jul
ancient8–130.0720%24 Jul
mirage13–80.0418%24 Jul
dust213–50.1723%24 Jul
mirage13–20.0817%24 Jul
dust23–130.0124%24 Jul
boulder13–60.0623%24 Jul
dust215–150.0531%24 Jul
nuke11–130.0133%24 Jul
mirage11–130.0627%24 Jul
inferno5–130.0741%24 Jul
anubis13–70.0521%23 Jul
cache13–70.0526%23 Jul
shelter5–13-0.0024%23 Jul
fachwerk13–100.0230%23 Jul
cache13–30.0817%23 Jul
dust28–13-0.0732%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0919%23 Jul
anubis5–130.0324%23 Jul
overpass13–80.1029%23 Jul
mirage10–130.0631%22 Jul
nuke13–110.0026%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0922%22 Jul
cache13–90.1835%22 Jul
mirage13–10.0414%22 Jul
anubis13–50.1818%22 Jul
eldorado7–9-0.0521%22 Jul
poseidon2–9-0.0420%22 Jul
anubis13–110.0527%22 Jul
dust212–120.0230%22 Jul
ancient12–120.1021%21 Jul
shelter7–13-0.0427%21 Jul
vertigo13–20.0726%21 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →