ItchyBalls

ItchyBalls — CS2 Stats

SV76561199827182699[U:1:1866916971]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

680Tracked matches53%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,089Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating10,796Blue band · top ~50.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,437 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 680 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 64 days played since 27 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,796 +1,809 28 Mar18 Sept · 46 days played
8,35714,543peak 14,54328 Mar18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,437 +0 15 Sept18 Sept · 2 observations
1,4371,437peak 1,43715 Sept18 Sept
14,543Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,437Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
64Days played since 2026-03-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,437
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 94 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,747 below peak (14,543)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,632 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,204 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,334), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate45.3%46.8%48.3%3.0% short
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.981.061.070.09 short
Match win rate49.0%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGItchyBallsFACEITLevel 8 · 1,437 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER10,796 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,437csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning49
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45541Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.4pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 600ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility5.5
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch4.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 628ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning4.9
Utility5.5
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time627ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%+2.1%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 25 Apr
45%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 12 Jul
430msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · anubis, 5 Jul
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 8anubisWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31151648%0.02
dust2C25111444%0.01
anubisC1661038%0.03
cacheB84450%0.00
infernoC52340%-0.01
ancientC52340%0.01
nuke41325%0.05
vertigo21150%-0.04
office220100%-0.00
shelter110100%0.04
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

29,067Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
1,585Matches
49.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
45.3%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,870MVPs
627Hours (in match)
1,876Bombs planted
254Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,756dust2
1,427inferno
854nuke
146vertigo
123train
66office
6ar_shoots
3italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,267Matches
50%Win rate
0.99Avg K/D
86.9ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage49649%1.0116.5
Dust219545%0.9515.1
Anubis19454%1.0216.0
Inferno11159%1.0014.9
Ancient11053%0.9915.6
Nuke6549%0.8313.4
Overpass6340%0.9315.5
Cache1844%1.0917.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.2%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
628msReaction time
32.2%T opening success
38.5%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
13.97HE damage / grenade
4.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.218% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.063%23 Aug
dust22–13-0.0124%16 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.1813%12 Aug
vertigo13–40.1020%8 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0619%31 Jul
dust213–70.0324%30 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0117%29 Jul
dust26–13-0.0011%29 Jul
mirage13–40.0314%28 Jul
mirage13–40.0216%28 Jul
anubis13–90.0234%27 Jul
cache13–100.0911%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0422%26 Jul
mirage0–8-0.1033%22 Jul
dust213–9-0.0319%19 Jul
dust27–20.0817%19 Jul
dust210–13-0.0121%18 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0014%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.018%17 Jul
shelter13–50.0427%15 Jul
ancient13–70.0325%15 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0021%14 Jul
cache10–130.0027%14 Jul
office13–8-0.0222%14 Jul
office13–50.0123%14 Jul
dust213–6-0.0327%14 Jul
cache13–50.037%14 Jul
dust213–7-0.0426%13 Jul
dust211–130.0021%13 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0114%13 Jul
inferno9–130.0116%12 Jul
cache13–100.0519%12 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0445%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0422%12 Jul
dust213–80.1211%12 Jul
anubis13–10.0122%10 Jul
dust213–2-0.0030%10 Jul
anubis13–110.0213%9 Jul
mirage3–13-0.106%9 Jul
anubis10–130.0325%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0312%7 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0411%7 Jul
mirage11–130.0521%5 Jul
anubis9–130.0418%5 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0118%3 Jul
dust215–19-0.0121%2 Jul
dust216–13-0.0022%28 Jun
dust28–130.0428%24 Jun
dust214–160.0427%24 Jun
dust211–13-0.0417%22 Jun
mirage1–100.0033%21 Jun
dust28–130.0214%21 Jun
cache17–19-0.0614%18 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0120%18 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0214%17 Jun
mirage13–80.0915%15 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0214%14 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0417%14 Jun
dust213–60.0416%14 Jun
dust213–160.0418%10 Jun
mirage13–110.0216%10 Jun
mirage13–50.0412%6 Jun
dust213–10-0.0113%4 Jun
mirage13–60.1419%4 Jun
anubis13–100.0926%1 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0218%31 May
dust213–80.0316%27 May
ancient13–70.0328%26 May
mirage15–15-0.0015%21 May
dust28–130.0316%17 May
dust29–13-0.0315%16 May
nuke7–130.0423%15 May
mirage13–30.1217%15 May
anubis13–160.1220%14 May
cache22–180.0013%10 May
mirage13–30.0627%9 May
mirage19–16-0.0418%9 May
anubis9–13-0.0115%7 May
ancient4–130.0327%3 May
mirage3–13-0.0124%2 May
cache3–7-0.0013%30 Apr
cache4–13-0.0818%29 Apr
anubis13–40.1622%25 Apr
dust26–13-0.0513%21 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0322%17 Apr
mirage13–50.1215%16 Apr
mirage13–90.0616%16 Apr
inferno13–110.0114%13 Apr
nuke13–100.048%12 Apr
inferno9–60.0130%12 Apr
anubis13–10.0619%7 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0114%6 Apr
nuke8–130.0315%6 Apr
dust23–13-0.0216%1 Apr
anubis8–130.1522%1 Apr
mirage13–30.0516%31 Mar
inferno3–13-0.097%30 Mar
mirage14–160.1012%28 Mar
nuke9–130.0725%28 Mar
mirage16–190.0618%27 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →