Daniel Düsentrieb

Daniel Düsentrieb — CS2 Stats

DE76561199821769188[U:1:1861503460]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

541Tracked matches68%Win rate2025Tracked since
944Hours in CS18Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,497Blue band · top ~31.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,497 -81 19 Sept – 2 Nov · 11 days played
13,49414,923peak 14,92319 Sept2 Nov
14,923Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-09-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 426 below peak (14,923)
  • -426 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 503 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-19
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate48.8%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio1.151.021.03above
Match win rate48.4%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDaniel DüsentriebFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,497 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning58
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44–48–8Last 10044%Win rateLWWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.3pp headshot accuracy · −92ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 13–6–1 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility3.9
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch5.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 589ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.8
Utility3.9
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time588ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 573ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 6–1 · anubis, 27 Sept →
54%Best headshot accuracy · 8–1 · dust2, 11 Oct →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 18 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · office, 2 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
4–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 8officeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A1911–858%0.04
infernoD186–1233%0.04
cacheB115–645%0.05
ancientB105–550%0.03
mirageC104–640%0.01
nukeA85–363%0.02
anubisA74–357%0.06
officeD61–517%0.09
vertigo—41–325%0.05
train—40–40%0.02
overpass—32–167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

25,839Lifetime kills
1.15K/D · Top 25% of Level 5 players
1,473Matches
48.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
48.8%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,822MVPs
578Hours (in match)
1,046Bombs planted
379Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,801dust2
2,419inferno
1,868nuke
1,357office
609vertigo
222train
7ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

58Matches
57%Win rate
1.33Avg K/D
84.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
30%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1759%1.7517.1
Dust21040%1.0815.8
Nuke1070%1.1915.6
Mirage956%1.2518.2
Cache580%1.3717.2
Overpass425%0.9216.5
Ancient367%0.9211.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.6%Headshot accuracy
39.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
7.4°Preaim
589msReaction time
48.7%T opening success
37.7%CT opening success
0.44Enemies flashed / flash
1.1%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
4.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4375 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.7483% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.0718%2 Nov →
cache13–3-0.0218%2 Nov →
inferno13–100.0219%2 Nov →
nuke8–130.0230%1 Nov →
ancient13–110.0412%1 Nov →
anubis5–130.0622%30 Oct →
office11–130.0935%30 Oct →
ancient13–50.0111%28 Oct →
dust213–80.0222%28 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0215%28 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0221%28 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.1312%27 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0623%26 Oct →
vertigo9–6-0.0117%26 Oct →
cache12–120.0219%26 Oct →
cache13–80.0717%25 Oct →
anubis13–70.1120%25 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0111%25 Oct →
inferno13–40.0226%22 Oct →
nuke13–2-0.0225%21 Oct →
nuke13–50.1230%21 Oct →
ancient12–12-0.0120%20 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0210%19 Oct →
ancient6–130.0425%19 Oct →
ancient13–70.0716%18 Oct →
dust213–50.1036%18 Oct →
inferno9–130.0830%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0317%18 Oct →
inferno13–40.1211%18 Oct →
overpass13–20.0614%17 Oct →
mirage10–130.018%17 Oct →
cache13–40.1523%17 Oct →
ancient13–90.0716%17 Oct →
dust213–50.1128%17 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0116%17 Oct →
inferno10–130.1021%17 Oct →
cache9–130.0440%16 Oct →
nuke13–90.0218%16 Oct →
nuke13–90.1821%16 Oct →
dust26–13-0.050%16 Oct →
inferno13–50.0219%16 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0617%15 Oct →
anubis13–100.0225%15 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0413%14 Oct →
dust213–30.0323%14 Oct →
ancient13–100.0915%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0217%13 Oct →
office3–13-0.0723%11 Oct →
inferno7–130.0225%11 Oct →
dust213–20.1028%11 Oct →
dust28–10.1954%11 Oct →
train12–120.0625%11 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0224%11 Oct →
cache11–130.0610%9 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0213%9 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0130%9 Oct →
dust211–130.0122%9 Oct →
vertigo8–130.1017%9 Oct →
nuke13–30.0227%9 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0230%8 Oct →
train6–130.0320%8 Oct →
dust212–120.0836%8 Oct →
train1–130.0321%8 Oct →
train8–13-0.0210%8 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0215%4 Oct →
mirage12–120.0423%4 Oct →
office5–130.0831%4 Oct →
overpass13–11-0.0127%2 Oct →
mirage5–130.0132%2 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0441%2 Oct →
office11–130.0928%2 Oct →
office13–10.1433%2 Oct →
anubis7–130.0834%2 Oct →
inferno10–130.0726%2 Oct →
dust27–13-0.039%1 Oct →
dust211–130.0114%1 Oct →
cache12–120.1314%1 Oct →
overpass8–80.0513%1 Oct →
mirage13–110.033%30 Sept →
inferno13–100.107%30 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0011%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.0210%29 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0311%29 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0214%29 Sept →
dust213–100.0720%29 Sept →
inferno10–130.0610%28 Sept →
dust213–100.1211%28 Sept →
inferno9–130.0020%27 Sept →
anubis6–10.2220%27 Sept →
vertigo8–130.0917%27 Sept →
vertigo11–130.0422%27 Sept →
dust27–130.079%26 Sept →
cache7–130.1332%26 Sept →
inferno8–130.0427%26 Sept →
office12–120.2030%26 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0221%26 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0230%26 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0718%26 Sept →
inferno11–130.1829%26 Sept →
mirage13–110.0015%26 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.