MalenMAIN

MalenMAIN — CS2 Stats

AF76561199810369826[U:1:1850104098]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

365Tracked matches66%Win rate2025Tracked since
4,135Hours in CS54Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating23,424Top 25% of 212,910 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#38955 of 259624 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,555 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,424 -2,110 10 Oct – 2 Nov · 13 days played
16,98125,844peak 25,84410 Oct2 Nov
26,043Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,555Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
16Days played since 2026-10-10

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,555
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 196 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,420 below peak (25,844)
  • -2,110 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,576 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate52.9%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.961.061.070.12 short
Match win rate49.8%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMalenMAINFACEITLevel 8 · 1,555 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER23,424 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,555csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning57
Utility48

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58–38–4Last 10058%Win rateLLLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +28ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility4.8
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 57% on T to 32% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.7
Utility4.8
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time579ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy19.7%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.32Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 26 Oct →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 9–6 · nuke, 26 Oct →
414msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · ancient, 24 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 14 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L4Current streak
2–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 75% over 12mirageWeakest map · 30% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2215–768%0.05
mirageD206–1430%-0.01
anubisA149–564%0.01
nukeS129–375%0.10
cacheB115–645%-0.01
dust2S86–275%-0.00
ancientS75–271%-0.00
office—21–150%0.01
overpass—21–150%0.15
poseidon—11–0100%0.06
debris—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 20). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,423Lifetime kills
0.96K/D
1,154Matches
49.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,074MVPs
663Hours (in match)
925Bombs planted
228Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,215dust2
1,008inferno
772nuke
174train
160office
130vertigo
2ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

455Matches
53%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
81.4ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage15948%1.0015.3
Dust210151%1.0316.3
Ancient6356%1.0816.5
Anubis5355%1.1016.3
Nuke3456%1.0214.8
Inferno2167%1.1718.2
Overpass1471%1.0515.4
Cache757%1.1617.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
570msReaction time
57.4%T opening success
31.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
5.42HE damage / grenade
6.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 31.5218% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache9–13-0.0515%2 Nov →
mirage6–13-0.0718%2 Nov →
anubis7–130.0320%2 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.0222%2 Nov →
dust216–13-0.0318%1 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0524%1 Nov →
nuke13–60.0621%1 Nov →
anubis13–30.0117%1 Nov →
dust25–13-0.0717%1 Nov →
mirage13–3-0.0113%1 Nov →
ancient13–5-0.0021%1 Nov →
cache13–9-0.0216%1 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.045%1 Nov →
inferno9–6-0.0034%1 Nov →
dust28–13-0.0319%31 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0421%31 Oct →
mirage13–40.038%31 Oct →
nuke15–150.0416%31 Oct →
anubis13–70.0615%31 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0312%31 Oct →
anubis16–130.0019%31 Oct →
cache13–60.0016%31 Oct →
nuke9–40.2014%31 Oct →
cache13–10.1118%31 Oct →
nuke13–90.0723%31 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0512%30 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0221%30 Oct →
dust213–80.0418%30 Oct →
dust213–30.0115%30 Oct →
cache13–80.0126%30 Oct →
poseidon9–30.0644%29 Oct →
office13–10.0321%29 Oct →
office4–13-0.0153%29 Oct →
inferno9–60.0221%28 Oct →
overpass9–10.2812%28 Oct →
debris8–8-0.0525%28 Oct →
inferno7–9-0.0817%27 Oct →
nuke9–10.1722%27 Oct →
overpass7–90.0327%27 Oct →
inferno9–10.0517%27 Oct →
inferno9–20.1724%27 Oct →
inferno9–60.0328%27 Oct →
nuke6–9-0.0226%26 Oct →
nuke9–40.1916%26 Oct →
inferno9–00.2040%26 Oct →
inferno9–50.1831%26 Oct →
inferno9–60.0830%26 Oct →
inferno9–70.0831%26 Oct →
nuke9–60.2760%26 Oct →
inferno9–30.1622%26 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.0829%26 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0722%26 Oct →
mirage9–130.0417%26 Oct →
inferno9–10.3227%26 Oct →
inferno9–7-0.0124%26 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0212%26 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0432%25 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0531%25 Oct →
inferno12–16-0.0127%25 Oct →
anubis13–70.0424%25 Oct →
nuke9–00.0819%25 Oct →
inferno9–4-0.0716%25 Oct →
inferno9–10.1821%25 Oct →
dust213–2-0.0131%24 Oct →
nuke13–60.0020%24 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0325%24 Oct →
dust216–13-0.0017%24 Oct →
ancient13–40.0619%24 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0321%24 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0230%24 Oct →
nuke8–80.0418%24 Oct →
cache3–5-0.0023%24 Oct →
mirage13–40.0524%24 Oct →
mirage6–00.1257%24 Oct →
cache12–160.0335%24 Oct →
cache4–10-0.0810%24 Oct →
inferno10–130.0123%23 Oct →
anubis13–100.0425%23 Oct →
cache8–13-0.078%23 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0220%23 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0214%22 Oct →
nuke13–80.0525%22 Oct →
cache16–120.0218%22 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0118%14 Oct →
mirage12–160.0218%14 Oct →
mirage10–130.0225%14 Oct →
anubis13–00.0236%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0318%14 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0126%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.1027%14 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0412%14 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0318%12 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0220%12 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0417%12 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0419%11 Oct →
ancient13–60.0921%11 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0625%11 Oct →
dust213–60.0921%11 Oct →
inferno9–130.0123%11 Oct →
anubis10–130.0619%10 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.