Chillyson83

Chillyson83 — CS2 Stats

DE76561199809839407[U:1:1849573679]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,095Tracked matches53%Win rate2024Tracked since
961Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,121 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,121 → 1,121
+13Tracked matches · now 1,095
+3.3ppWin rate · 50.0% → 53.3%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 41 days played since 6 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,121 +0 4 Sept13 Sept · 2 observations
1,1211,121peak 1,1214 Sept13 Sept
1,121Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-07-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,121
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 80 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-04
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate47.5%45.7%46.8%meets
Shot accuracy0.1%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.221.051.06above
Match win rate52.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGChillyson83FACEITLevel 7 · 1,121 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,121csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning52
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53461Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +38ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 564ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility7.0
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.9° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time558ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 558ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 16.3% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 16 Sept
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 1 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 10 Aug
13–0Biggest win · overpass, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
210In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 67% over 6nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientB29151452%0.01
dust2A28161257%-0.00
cacheB178947%0.01
anubisB84450%0.01
mirageS64267%0.04
nukeD62433%0.03
inferno42250%0.05
vertigo110100%-0.01
overpass110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

21,975Lifetime kills
1.22K/D · Top 25% of Level 7 players
1,308Matches
52.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
47.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 7 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
2,978MVPs
546Hours (in match)
1,844Bombs planted
477Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,900dust2
2,026nuke
1,602inferno
204train
145vertigo
41office
25italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

311Matches
47%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
81.6ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust28947%1.1915.8
Ancient7250%1.2516.6
Nuke4738%1.2116.0
Anubis3546%1.2415.1
Inferno1942%1.2313.7
Cache1861%1.3517.6
Overpass1747%1.9015.1
Mirage1258%0.9011.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy
42.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
10.9°Preaim
553msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
43.7%CT opening success
0.68Enemies flashed / flash
8.3%Flash assists
13.54HE damage / grenade
7.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7439% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–80.0013%21 Sept
mirage11–130.0121%21 Sept
mirage13–60.0334%20 Sept
mirage13–80.1021%20 Sept
mirage13–60.1034%16 Sept
dust210–130.0225%14 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0420%14 Sept
anubis11–130.046%13 Sept
cache8–13-0.0415%13 Sept
cache4–13-0.0328%9 Sept
ancient13–30.0812%9 Sept
dust213–11-0.0010%9 Sept
cache13–70.0622%9 Sept
anubis11–130.0615%8 Sept
dust213–30.0232%7 Sept
anubis13–5-0.0013%7 Sept
ancient13–20.0622%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0611%3 Sept
inferno13–80.0814%3 Sept
dust216–13-0.0317%2 Sept
nuke7–130.0015%2 Sept
dust213–20.0144%1 Sept
ancient13–50.017%1 Sept
dust25–13-0.0612%1 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0418%31 Aug
vertigo13–10-0.0118%31 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0221%31 Aug
ancient10–130.029%31 Aug
dust213–9-0.0416%27 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0417%26 Aug
dust212–16-0.0313%26 Aug
nuke13–90.0522%25 Aug
cache11–130.0119%24 Aug
dust24–13-0.0624%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0512%15 Aug
dust29–130.0028%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.036%15 Aug
ancient13–9-0.058%15 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1022%13 Aug
cache13–160.0029%13 Aug
dust26–13-0.0412%12 Aug
cache13–100.0125%12 Aug
dust213–90.0115%12 Aug
cache13–110.0015%11 Aug
cache13–70.0824%11 Aug
ancient10–130.0321%11 Aug
cache13–80.0427%10 Aug
ancient10–130.0224%10 Aug
dust213–60.0119%10 Aug
dust211–13-0.0513%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0015%9 Aug
cache14–16-0.0023%5 Aug
ancient13–20.0019%5 Aug
inferno15–150.0413%5 Aug
dust213–90.0216%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0219%4 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0221%3 Aug
dust213–100.1017%3 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0513%3 Aug
overpass13–00.0321%3 Aug
ancient13–100.049%2 Aug
dust25–13-0.0418%2 Aug
anubis13–70.0210%2 Aug
ancient13–30.0924%2 Aug
nuke13–40.0717%1 Aug
dust210–130.0517%1 Aug
dust213–30.0713%31 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0213%30 Jul
ancient13–50.067%30 Jul
cache6–130.0117%30 Jul
ancient13–40.016%29 Jul
anubis13–80.038%29 Jul
dust213–16-0.0212%29 Jul
inferno13–70.0316%28 Jul
ancient16–120.059%27 Jul
ancient13–2-0.006%27 Jul
cache13–50.0025%27 Jul
dust214–160.0629%27 Jul
cache13–4-0.008%26 Jul
dust213–6-0.0213%26 Jul
nuke11–130.0326%22 Jul
anubis13–90.0220%21 Jul
cache13–10-0.0234%21 Jul
dust213–90.0828%21 Jul
ancient13–50.0616%21 Jul
dust213–6-0.0214%20 Jul
dust213–10-0.0125%20 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0120%20 Jul
inferno9–130.0514%14 Jul
cache5–130.0120%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0321%14 Jul
cache11–13-0.0211%13 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0216%13 Jul
dust213–10-0.0618%9 Jul
cache5–130.0124%9 Jul
nuke13–160.0515%8 Jul
ancient7–130.035%8 Jul
dust213–7-0.035%8 Jul
ancient13–90.0616%6 Jul
dust210–13-0.0521%6 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →