SauVAGE-

SauVAGE- — CS2 Stats

76561199806556723[U:1:1846290995]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

781Tracked matches73%Win rate2025Tracked since
800Hours in CS75Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches98——
Win rate47%——
K/D4.99——
Headshot %82%——

Measured 6 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,879), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate65.6%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.741.031.05above
Match win rate51.9%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSauVAGE-FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning54
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–51Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −1ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 20

  • 16–4 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility5.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning5.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time598ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 30 Sept →
38%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · dust2, 15 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · overpass, 16 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 26 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3519–1654%-0.01
dust2C208–1240%0.00
ancientC146–843%-0.00
cacheB105–550%0.03
anubisC104–640%-0.02
nukeS54–180%0.02
inferno—43–175%-0.03
poseidon—10–10%-0.13
overpass—10–10%-0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

41,372Lifetime kills
1.74K/D · Top 5% of Level 6 players
1,112Matches
51.9%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 6 players
65.6%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,227MVPs
415Hours (in match)
1,088Bombs planted
564Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,435dust2
1,410nuke
950inferno
458train
52vertigo
51office
3ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

164Matches
52%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
67.1ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5260%0.9512.1
Dust23546%0.9112.6
Ancient3040%0.9913.2
Anubis1729%0.9612.9
Nuke1369%1.1716.9
Cache1070%1.4815.0
Inferno475%1.0012.0
Overpass367%1.1113.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.5%Spray accuracy
76.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
595msReaction time
51.1%T opening success
36.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
10.0%Flash assists
8.06HE damage / grenade
10.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.3181% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage16–140.0019%2 Oct →
dust213–60.1314%2 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0019%1 Oct →
ancient13–70.0718%1 Oct →
cache13–40.1224%1 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0512%30 Sept →
dust213–40.1432%30 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0314%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.0115%29 Sept →
dust213–110.0115%29 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0524%29 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0115%29 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0013%28 Sept →
cache13–40.0720%28 Sept →
dust213–30.0315%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0437%28 Sept →
poseidon3–9-0.1319%28 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0413%27 Sept →
inferno13–40.0420%27 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0322%27 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0715%27 Sept →
dust213–60.0115%27 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0124%27 Sept →
inferno13–60.0121%27 Sept →
dust210–130.0122%26 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0416%26 Sept →
mirage13–10.0111%26 Sept →
nuke22–190.0318%25 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.093%25 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.046%25 Sept →
mirage8–130.0216%24 Sept →
ancient13–110.0425%24 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0111%24 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0220%23 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0122%23 Sept →
ancient13–40.0322%23 Sept →
dust211–130.0121%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0327%23 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0120%23 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0124%22 Sept →
dust215–19-0.0319%22 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0510%22 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0511%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0412%21 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.076%21 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0210%21 Sept →
dust213–9-0.049%21 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0215%21 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.048%20 Sept →
ancient13–30.0413%20 Sept →
mirage16–120.0515%20 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.038%20 Sept →
nuke13–50.0118%20 Sept →
dust23–130.0019%20 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0117%20 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.0211%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0112%19 Sept →
ancient5–130.0015%19 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
mirage13–100.0225%17 Sept →
cache4–13-0.0015%17 Sept →
mirage16–120.1121%17 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0423%17 Sept →
nuke9–50.0711%16 Sept →
overpass1–9-0.210%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0513%16 Sept →
mirage1–130.0420%16 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0221%16 Sept →
dust213–20.0115%16 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0721%15 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0438%15 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0316%15 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0421%14 Sept →
anubis13–80.0214%14 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0115%14 Sept →
mirage5–130.0927%14 Sept →
ancient13–90.0418%13 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0319%13 Sept →
cache13–70.0216%13 Sept →
mirage10–130.0414%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0720%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0318%13 Sept →
mirage5–130.0412%13 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0223%11 Sept →
anubis14–160.0216%11 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0118%11 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0517%11 Sept →
cache14–16-0.0314%10 Sept →
mirage13–70.0618%10 Sept →
cache13–50.1120%10 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.1216%2 Sept →
dust29–130.0214%2 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.069%2 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0913%1 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.1121%31 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0313%31 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0411%30 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0410%30 Aug →
anubis13–60.0510%30 Aug →
cache9–130.0011%29 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.