Tung tung  tung sahur FUNK

Tung tung tung sahur FUNK — CS2 Stats

76561199802049555[U:1:1841783827]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

663Tracked matches45%Win rate2025Tracked since
645Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,977Blue band · top ~49.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,977 -2,891 1 Aug – 27 Oct · 25 days played
10,97714,417peak 14,4171 Aug27 Oct
14,538Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-08-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,440 below peak (14,417)
  • -1,670 over 30 days · declining
  • -2,891 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,023 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate54.8%44.8%45.7%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.4%12.7%12.7% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.050.10 short
Match win rate47.3%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTung tung tung sahur FUNKFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER10,977 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning62
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–49–2Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · +4.1pp headshot accuracy · −45ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility4.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.2
Utility4.1
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 9–1 · inferno, 12 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · inferno, 28 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–5 · inferno, 11 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 18 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2816–1257%0.03
mirageD175–1229%-0.00
dust2A148–657%0.00
ancientB147–750%-0.00
nukeB137–654%0.05
anubisA53–260%0.03
cacheD51–420%-0.01
poseidon—31–233%-0.05
vertigo—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Lifetime stats

31,825Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
2,021Matches
47.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 6 players
54.8%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 6 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
6,526MVPs
645Hours (in match)
1,463Bombs planted
1,006Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,469inferno
3,155nuke
2,329dust2
503vertigo
255train
6office
3italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

272Matches
50%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
82.4ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10149%1.0115.6
Ancient6455%1.3616.2
Dust24048%0.9615.6
Anubis2339%1.0718.0
Inferno1953%1.1818.8
Nuke1669%0.9415.1
Cache540%0.9414.0
Vertigo367%0.9114.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.8%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
81.0%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
561msReaction time
56.0%T opening success
44.6%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
7.63HE damage / grenade
8.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4259 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–40.0119%27 Oct →
inferno9–40.1536%25 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0840%25 Oct →
inferno13–90.0612%25 Oct →
anubis16–130.1017%25 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0320%21 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0238%19 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0333%19 Oct →
nuke10–130.0522%18 Oct →
inferno13–0-0.0240%18 Oct →
dust213–100.0438%18 Oct →
anubis13–10.0519%18 Oct →
dust23–00.1430%18 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0417%18 Oct →
nuke9–50.1823%18 Oct →
inferno4–90.0515%18 Oct →
inferno9–70.0816%18 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0718%17 Oct →
dust27–130.1232%17 Oct →
ancient8–13-0.0129%17 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0034%16 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0135%14 Oct →
inferno9–60.2630%11 Oct →
inferno9–50.0633%11 Oct →
nuke11–130.0212%11 Oct →
inferno1–120.0524%11 Oct →
poseidon9–6-0.1114%11 Oct →
inferno9–70.0032%11 Oct →
inferno3–9-0.1017%6 Oct →
mirage11–130.0315%3 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0822%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0112%3 Oct →
cache15–15-0.0220%30 Sept →
inferno9–50.2018%30 Sept →
dust213–90.0822%29 Sept →
dust213–50.0011%29 Sept →
ancient13–110.0523%29 Sept →
poseidon2–9-0.0236%28 Sept →
inferno0–9-0.2150%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0416%27 Sept →
mirage11–130.0122%25 Sept →
cache5–13-0.067%25 Sept →
inferno9–50.1329%25 Sept →
inferno6–90.1118%24 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0850%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0334%22 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0617%17 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0629%14 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0327%13 Sept →
mirage13–70.0017%12 Sept →
ancient10–130.0217%11 Sept →
ancient16–13-0.018%5 Sept →
poseidon6–9-0.0322%4 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.038%4 Sept →
nuke9–70.0327%4 Sept →
nuke9–60.0725%1 Sept →
nuke9–20.1938%1 Sept →
nuke9–40.1223%1 Sept →
vertigo13–80.0422%30 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0314%30 Aug →
nuke7–90.1133%23 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0115%23 Aug →
inferno13–70.0613%23 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.0450%23 Aug →
ancient13–40.0822%22 Aug →
anubis8–130.0919%21 Aug →
dust216–14-0.0236%21 Aug →
inferno16–140.0321%18 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0223%18 Aug →
mirage13–70.0415%17 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0620%16 Aug →
nuke3–13-0.0915%16 Aug →
ancient13–20.0514%15 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0418%14 Aug →
mirage9–130.0332%14 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0413%12 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.1619%12 Aug →
inferno1–9-0.2250%12 Aug →
inferno9–10.3128%12 Aug →
ancient13–5-0.0318%11 Aug →
inferno9–20.1316%11 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0117%11 Aug →
inferno9–40.1029%11 Aug →
inferno6–130.0224%9 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0413%9 Aug →
mirage13–10.0720%9 Aug →
ancient13–30.0521%5 Aug →
cache6–130.0119%5 Aug →
cache13–40.0514%5 Aug →
mirage5–110.0631%4 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0524%4 Aug →
mirage4–130.0133%3 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0123%3 Aug →
nuke13–100.0017%2 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0532%2 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0221%2 Aug →
nuke13–50.0531%2 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0814%2 Aug →
dust213–110.0248%2 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0428%1 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.