AhAvA

AhAvA — CS2 Stats

76561199791537657[U:1:1831271929]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

782Tracked matches54%Win rate2025Tracked since
800Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,391Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62517 of 251772 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 992 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−319Premier CS Rating · 21,710 → 21,391

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,391 +162 16 Aug – 14 Oct · 21 days played
21,22523,567peak 23,56716 Aug14 Oct
23,567Peak Premier in tracked matches
992Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-08-16

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 992
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 59 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,176 below peak (23,567)
  • -705 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,609 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,138), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate52.0%45.7%46.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%12.7%13.0%13.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.061.051.06meets
Match win rate54.2%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAhAvAFACEITLevel 7 · 992 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,391 · Pink bandPEAK ELO992csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning61
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWLWWWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 20

  • 11–7–2 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.7
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 78% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 78% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels6.4
Win Impact6.2

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time537ms−53ms
first ⅓ avg 589ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−4.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 24 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · cache, 27 Aug →
406msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · cache, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 9 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA4928–2157%0.01
cacheB157–847%-0.01
dust2S86–275%0.02
ancientC73–443%-0.00
nukeD61–517%-0.00
infernoS65–183%0.01
anubisD50–50%-0.05
vertigo—32–167%0.02
office—11–0100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,881Lifetime kills
1.06K/D · Top 50% of Level 7 players
1,240Matches
54.2%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 7 players
52.0%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 7 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,842MVPs
478Hours (in match)
996Bombs planted
336Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,566dust2
1,232nuke
1,207inferno
338vertigo
117office
34train
2ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

112Matches
55%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
82.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3462%1.1917.2
Anubis1650%1.1314.7
Dust21457%1.2118.1
Ancient1338%0.8413.9
Nuke1250%0.8412.9
Cache944%1.0515.8
Inferno967%1.3817.9
Overpass367%1.4816.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.3%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.2%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
541msReaction time
78.3%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
10.58HE damage / grenade
12.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust216–120.0320%14 Oct →
nuke9–130.0227%14 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0231%14 Oct →
vertigo9–5-0.0022%14 Oct →
mirage13–80.0913%14 Oct →
mirage11–130.009%12 Oct →
dust213–40.0616%12 Oct →
mirage13–40.0213%12 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0622%12 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0017%12 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0110%12 Oct →
mirage10–40.0320%12 Oct →
ancient0–13-0.0715%12 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0521%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0021%8 Oct →
dust213–160.0120%8 Oct →
mirage7–2-0.0817%8 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0218%7 Oct →
mirage12–120.1019%7 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0319%6 Oct →
mirage8–130.0330%6 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0214%6 Oct →
mirage13–50.0411%5 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0324%3 Oct →
cache8–130.0015%30 Sept →
mirage7–130.0112%30 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0419%29 Sept →
dust213–100.018%29 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0610%28 Sept →
mirage13–80.0415%25 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.037%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0819%24 Sept →
vertigo7–130.0311%24 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0417%24 Sept →
mirage13–90.0023%20 Sept →
mirage2–130.0725%20 Sept →
mirage13–30.0417%19 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0223%19 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0515%19 Sept →
dust213–30.0423%19 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0713%19 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0012%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.0313%17 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.0612%17 Sept →
dust213–20.0336%15 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0718%15 Sept →
cache13–5-0.0515%15 Sept →
mirage6–130.0226%14 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.1028%14 Sept →
cache3–13-0.0320%14 Sept →
mirage13–30.0619%14 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0329%10 Sept →
mirage13–40.0115%9 Sept →
mirage13–10.0518%9 Sept →
ancient13–30.0215%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0632%8 Sept →
mirage5–00.0325%8 Sept →
mirage13–60.0513%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0130%6 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0419%5 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0229%4 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0117%3 Sept →
cache13–40.0124%3 Sept →
office13–6-0.0224%3 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0818%2 Sept →
cache14–160.0213%2 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0612%2 Sept →
ancient11–130.0012%1 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0118%1 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0312%1 Sept →
mirage13–60.0521%30 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0129%29 Aug →
mirage13–30.1332%29 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0531%28 Aug →
mirage7–130.0224%28 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0012%28 Aug →
nuke13–30.1124%28 Aug →
anubis1–13-0.039%27 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.048%27 Aug →
cache13–20.1016%27 Aug →
cache9–130.0041%27 Aug →
inferno9–3-0.0128%27 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0428%26 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.0321%26 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0526%25 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0226%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.1133%25 Aug →
inferno11–0-0.0133%25 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0111%24 Aug →
inferno9–70.1618%24 Aug →
mirage1–13-0.0226%24 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0210%23 Aug →
cache13–110.0318%20 Aug →
mirage13–30.0526%20 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0112%19 Aug →
ancient13–60.0818%19 Aug →
ancient7–130.0122%19 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0619%17 Aug →
mirage5–130.0115%16 Aug →
nuke15–150.0020%16 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.