z

z — CS2 Stats

76561199789470003[U:1:1829204275]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

967Tracked matches52%Win rate2025Tracked since
881Hours in CS15Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating15,260Purple band · top ~27.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 29 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 15,260 +951 22 Aug – 29 Oct · 25 days played
13,84316,495peak 16,49522 Aug29 Oct
16,625Peak Premier in tracked matches
981Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-14

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,235 below peak (16,495)
  • +801 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 4,740 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate48.9%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy0.0%11.2%12.0%12.0% short
Kill/death ratio1.020.991.02meets
Match win rate47.2%43.9%44.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,260 · Purple bandPEAK ELO981csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning67
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.4pp headshot accuracy · −40ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.7
Utility6.1
Positioning6.7
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning6.7
Utility6.1
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels7.2
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time568ms+13ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy24.6%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 24.9% → last ⅓ avg 24.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 25 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · dust2, 24 Aug →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · nuke, 29 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 77% over 22dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2217–577%0.02
ancientC167–944%0.01
dust2C166–1038%0.03
nukeB137–654%0.03
cacheB136–746%0.04
anubisC125–742%0.01
infernoB84–450%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

17,561Lifetime kills
1.02K/D · Top 50% of Level 4 players
945Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 4 players
48.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 4 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,975MVPs
665Hours (in match)
661Bombs planted
239Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,693nuke
1,571dust2
1,019inferno
50vertigo
30train
10office
5lake
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

233Matches
48%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
80.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7041%1.1515.7
Dust25155%1.0015.1
Nuke2948%1.1215.7
Anubis2348%1.0614.9
Ancient2157%1.0917.1
Inferno1828%0.9014.2
Cache1560%0.9515.0
Overpass667%0.9414.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.0%Headshot accuracy
33.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.1%Spray accuracy
82.8%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
567msReaction time
58.8%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
9.2%Flash assists
9.32HE damage / grenade
12.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–16-0.0221%29 Oct →
ancient13–100.0526%29 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.1116%29 Oct →
ancient10–130.0330%29 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0922%29 Oct →
inferno6–130.0248%25 Oct →
ancient13–80.0620%25 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0422%25 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0326%24 Oct →
dust213–110.0417%24 Oct →
inferno13–80.0738%24 Oct →
mirage11–130.0533%23 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0833%23 Oct →
mirage13–30.0446%23 Oct →
cache13–30.0124%22 Oct →
dust215–150.057%20 Oct →
ancient7–130.0027%20 Oct →
anubis6–130.0122%16 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0425%16 Oct →
dust213–100.0616%16 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0519%16 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0525%15 Oct →
inferno11–130.0120%15 Oct →
cache13–30.1730%15 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.0512%13 Oct →
mirage16–130.0121%13 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0034%13 Oct →
ancient9–130.0219%13 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.096%13 Oct →
inferno13–70.0330%13 Oct →
cache5–130.0323%13 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0429%13 Oct →
mirage13–30.1527%13 Oct →
cache13–60.0418%13 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0214%10 Oct →
anubis13–10.0311%10 Oct →
ancient13–70.0816%10 Oct →
mirage13–40.0235%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0232%10 Oct →
nuke7–130.0630%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0521%10 Oct →
nuke13–80.0818%9 Oct →
ancient2–13-0.0116%9 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0314%7 Oct →
dust216–130.0827%6 Oct →
inferno8–130.0624%6 Oct →
ancient1–100.0429%6 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0415%6 Oct →
mirage13–110.0220%6 Oct →
dust213–40.0137%6 Oct →
cache11–130.0430%6 Oct →
inferno13–70.0015%6 Oct →
dust29–130.0434%6 Oct →
cache11–130.0533%6 Oct →
nuke13–70.0325%4 Oct →
mirage2–5-0.0218%4 Oct →
mirage13–30.0221%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0030%3 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0118%3 Oct →
mirage16–140.0121%3 Oct →
ancient13–90.0931%3 Oct →
anubis14–160.0618%3 Oct →
cache13–30.0422%2 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0010%2 Oct →
anubis12–12-0.0318%23 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0425%23 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0026%16 Sept →
nuke13–40.0421%16 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0422%27 Aug →
nuke13–40.0620%27 Aug →
ancient16–130.0218%27 Aug →
nuke13–100.1014%27 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0722%26 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0944%26 Aug →
dust29–130.0521%26 Aug →
ancient13–90.0413%26 Aug →
nuke8–130.0615%26 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0229%26 Aug →
cache15–150.0618%25 Aug →
dust213–70.1720%25 Aug →
nuke13–30.0923%25 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0329%25 Aug →
mirage13–20.059%24 Aug →
mirage13–100.0818%24 Aug →
anubis13–80.1013%24 Aug →
dust24–130.0318%24 Aug →
dust213–90.0422%24 Aug →
mirage13–70.0822%24 Aug →
dust27–130.00100%24 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0122%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0415%24 Aug →
anubis13–90.0927%24 Aug →
mirage13–40.0417%23 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0133%22 Aug →
cache13–70.1627%22 Aug →
cache13–110.1328%22 Aug →
anubis5–130.0332%22 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0121%22 Aug →
nuke13–20.0531%22 Aug →
mirage13–50.0238%20 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.