Czołem Panie Prezydencie

Czołem Panie Prezydencie — CS2 Stats

BZ76561199784550416[U:1:1824284688]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

473Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
383Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,693Blue band · top ~30% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 7 Sep 2026 (10 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 473 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 6 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,693 +447 6 Jun7 Sept · 25 days played
12,43015,022peak 15,0226 Jun7 Sept
15,122Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-06-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 329 below peak (15,022)
  • +366 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 307 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,548), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate50.9%41.9%42.7%above
Shot accuracy0.1%12.2%11.2%11.1% short
Kill/death ratio0.760.980.990.23 short
Match win rate42.0%43.3%43.9%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCzołem Panie PrezydencieFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER14,693 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning55
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateWLWLWLWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −35ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 20

  • 1172 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility3.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.7
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 681ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning5.5
Utility3.8
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time679ms+6ms
first ⅓ avg 672ms → last ⅓ avg 679ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 25.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 9–6 · poseidon, 7 Jun
50%Best headshot accuracy · 9–1 · poseidon, 10 Jul
445msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 28 Jun
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
52In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD1861233%-0.04
mirageB189950%-0.02
ancientA148657%-0.02
dust2C135838%-0.02
nukeA127558%-0.02
cacheB115645%-0.03
overpassA53260%-0.01
poseidon43175%0.04
anubis31233%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.06
debris110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

13,361Lifetime kills
0.76K/D
1,027Matches
42.0%Match win rate
50.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 3 players
0.1%Shot accuracy
1,711MVPs
383Hours (in match)
655Bombs planted
175Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

1,469inferno
928nuke
766dust2
142train
137vertigo
22office
13italy
3ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

225Matches
51%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
62.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
11%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5052%0.9113.5
Inferno4248%0.8511.7
Anubis3152%0.7110.6
Nuke3148%0.7711.9
Ancient3158%0.8612.6
Dust22737%0.7912.3
Overpass875%0.8013.1
Cache560%0.6510.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.3%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.8%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
681msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
7.83HE damage / grenade
6.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4078 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0113%29 Aug
inferno3–9-0.1917%3 Aug
inferno9–5-0.0236%3 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0339%28 Jul
nuke13–90.0819%28 Jul
vertigo4–9-0.0624%28 Jul
poseidon9–50.1322%28 Jul
inferno9–6-0.1115%28 Jul
inferno8–80.0048%25 Jul
nuke9–3-0.0325%25 Jul
poseidon8–8-0.1614%25 Jul
debris9–6-0.0219%25 Jul
dust23–130.0211%24 Jul
ancient13–60.0121%24 Jul
cache7–13-0.0424%22 Jul
mirage13–10.0531%22 Jul
mirage13–40.0534%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0832%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0417%19 Jul
dust210–40.0428%18 Jul
cache5–13-0.037%18 Jul
cache13–4-0.0438%18 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0229%18 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0813%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0327%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0124%18 Jul
inferno5–13-0.0115%17 Jul
ancient13–90.0613%17 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0627%17 Jul
ancient3–13-0.0218%17 Jul
cache13–40.0123%15 Jul
dust29–130.0329%14 Jul
ancient13–20.0418%14 Jul
nuke11–60.0118%14 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0215%13 Jul
dust213–100.0320%12 Jul
poseidon9–1-0.0250%10 Jul
mirage13–30.0719%10 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0227%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0225%10 Jul
cache13–10-0.0316%10 Jul
inferno13–4-0.0232%10 Jul
cache10–13-0.0815%9 Jul
ancient13–00.0223%9 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0729%9 Jul
cache13–11-0.048%9 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0433%9 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0528%9 Jul
cache13–90.0116%9 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0711%5 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0421%5 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0529%3 Jul
overpass5–13-0.037%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0420%30 Jun
cache10–13-0.0320%30 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0425%30 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0316%29 Jun
ancient13–80.0021%29 Jun
dust213–9-0.0127%29 Jun
inferno8–130.0118%28 Jun
overpass13–90.0333%28 Jun
overpass13–80.0029%28 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0816%28 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0914%28 Jun
dust29–13-0.0725%26 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0239%26 Jun
anubis7–13-0.050%24 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0144%24 Jun
ancient13–5-0.029%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0336%24 Jun
dust28–130.0323%24 Jun
mirage12–16-0.0117%14 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0628%13 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0818%11 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0347%11 Jun
inferno13–90.0016%11 Jun
dust27–13-0.0520%11 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0329%11 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0726%11 Jun
cache8–13-0.0517%11 Jun
inferno3–90.0333%11 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0429%11 Jun
nuke1–9-0.2129%11 Jun
dust25–13-0.0814%10 Jun
nuke16–12-0.0523%10 Jun
inferno10–13-0.1029%9 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0421%8 Jun
dust29–130.0030%8 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0350%7 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0222%7 Jun
poseidon9–60.2035%7 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0328%7 Jun
anubis10–130.0423%7 Jun
ancient13–8-0.0522%7 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0023%7 Jun
nuke13–10.1226%7 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0726%6 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0310%6 Jun
dust213–9-0.0922%6 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0517%6 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →