Brawkstaga

Brawkstaga — CS2 Stats

76561199741351043[U:1:1781085315]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

921Tracked matches56%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,112Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.5 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,493Blue band · top ~36.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,493 -2,812 23 Jul10 Sept · 10 days played
12,78516,305peak 16,30523 Jul10 Sept
16,377Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-07-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,812 below peak (16,305)
  • -1,507 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,507 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate41.3%43.8%44.8%3.5% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.0%12.4%12.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.871.021.040.17 short
Match win rate49.1%44.7%45.2%above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBrawkstagaFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,493 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning48
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41527Last 10041%Win rateLTTWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −3.1pp headshot accuracy · −101ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 212 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 10

  • 532 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 20

  • 893 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility4.2
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning4.8
Utility4.2
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time612ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy13.8%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 13.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · cache, 18 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–8 · anubis, 13 Aug
414msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 18 Aug
13–1Biggest win · vertigo, 28 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
38In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 10anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB20101050%0.02
dust2C1971237%-0.02
infernoC167944%0.00
ancientD123925%-0.00
vertigoA106460%0.00
nukeD93633%-0.03
anubisD51420%-0.02
mirage43175%0.03
overpass2020%-0.06
train21150%0.00
office1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,096Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
1,562Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 5 players
41.3%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
3,152MVPs
586Hours (in match)
2,449Bombs planted
334Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,588dust2
2,232nuke
1,405inferno
798vertigo
714train
139office
13italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

420Matches
51%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
69.2ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust210751%0.8212.3
Ancient7849%0.8814.0
Nuke6351%0.9413.7
Mirage5042%0.7511.7
Cache4661%1.0014.3
Inferno2357%0.8012.9
Overpass2050%0.9413.8
Anubis1436%0.7411.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.7%Headshot accuracy
33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
72.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
609msReaction time
36.4%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.45Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
11.73HE damage / grenade
11.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.7358% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.447 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.4286% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo5–13-0.0610%14 Sept
ancient12–120.0515%13 Sept
nuke12–120.0414%13 Sept
vertigo13–7-0.0713%13 Sept
cache13–4-0.020%10 Sept
dust213–50.019%10 Sept
dust24–13-0.0022%9 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0118%9 Sept
inferno13–9-0.037%8 Sept
vertigo13–110.026%8 Sept
nuke13–50.0111%8 Sept
ancient15–15-0.069%8 Sept
cache12–160.0219%8 Sept
vertigo13–110.0117%7 Sept
cache9–130.0324%7 Sept
inferno15–19-0.026%4 Sept
anubis9–130.0219%4 Sept
cache14–16-0.049%4 Sept
dust211–13-0.0521%4 Sept
inferno13–50.039%3 Sept
cache13–110.0610%2 Sept
office8–13-0.009%2 Sept
dust213–10-0.0414%31 Aug
cache10–13-0.0617%31 Aug
dust213–20.0517%31 Aug
nuke13–50.0020%29 Aug
mirage13–100.0414%29 Aug
cache10–13-0.0211%29 Aug
cache13–90.0131%29 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0113%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0713%28 Aug
vertigo13–10.1014%28 Aug
inferno9–130.0613%20 Aug
cache13–7-0.0229%20 Aug
inferno1–13-0.016%20 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0933%20 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0220%19 Aug
overpass6–9-0.1019%19 Aug
inferno3–9-0.150%19 Aug
ancient6–130.1312%19 Aug
cache13–30.0230%19 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0513%18 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0310%18 Aug
anubis8–130.057%18 Aug
nuke2–13-0.095%18 Aug
cache13–20.1525%18 Aug
cache13–100.0525%15 Aug
nuke7–130.029%15 Aug
dust211–13-0.0314%15 Aug
inferno13–60.067%14 Aug
inferno9–50.0323%14 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0530%14 Aug
nuke13–70.0013%14 Aug
cache13–8-0.0211%14 Aug
anubis0–8-0.0550%13 Aug
mirage13–10.0811%13 Aug
dust25–130.0315%13 Aug
cache1–13-0.0310%13 Aug
cache13–40.0728%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0015%12 Aug
ancient13–50.058%12 Aug
ancient0–5-0.070%12 Aug
cache12–12-0.0310%12 Aug
train13–60.019%12 Aug
train11–13-0.0116%12 Aug
nuke5–9-0.0919%11 Aug
dust213–8-0.0332%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.0316%11 Aug
cache7–130.1013%11 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0018%11 Aug
cache6–130.069%9 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0912%8 Aug
inferno5–90.0412%5 Aug
inferno9–40.1117%5 Aug
cache13–60.026%5 Aug
dust213–90.0015%5 Aug
dust26–0-0.030%5 Aug
dust20–2-0.090%5 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0712%4 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0117%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0310%31 Jul
inferno13–90.0114%31 Jul
dust213–3-0.0217%31 Jul
vertigo13–30.0932%29 Jul
vertigo5–130.0119%29 Jul
vertigo5–130.0122%29 Jul
dust28–130.0313%28 Jul
dust23–13-0.0518%25 Jul
ancient13–100.024%25 Jul
inferno9–13-0.039%25 Jul
cache8–13-0.0213%25 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0317%24 Jul
mirage13–30.0315%24 Jul
dust29–130.027%24 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0520%24 Jul
anubis8–13-0.113%24 Jul
ancient15–15-0.0311%24 Jul
dust20–13-0.0511%24 Jul
dust215–150.0218%24 Jul
inferno10–130.0013%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →