IIIHo6eJlb

IIIHo6eJlb — CS2 Stats

BQ76561199709767693[U:1:1749501965]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

918Tracked matches31%Win rate2024Tracked since
2,947Hours in CS71Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,853 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,853 → 1,853
+24Tracked matches · now 918
−6.9ppWin rate · 37.9% → 31.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 60 days played since 8 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 1,853 +0 1 Sept9 Sept · 3 observations
1,8531,853peak 1,8531 Sept9 Sept
1,853Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
60Days played since 2026-04-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,853
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 148 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01

CSDB’s own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches2119+2
Win rate62%53%+9pp
K/D0.871.09−0.23
Headshot %52%52%+0pp

Measured 9 Sep 202618 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 9 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=26,479), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate50.4%51.0%
Shot accuracy0.1%13.7%
Kill/death ratio0.871.09
Match win rate45.8%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIIIHo6eJlbFACEITLevel 10 · 1,853 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO1,853csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning62
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47485Last 10047%Win rateWLWLWLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 603ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels6.1
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 40% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning6.2
Utility4.1
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time595ms−7ms
first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−5.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 7–9 · inferno, 23 Jun
53%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · anubis, 16 Apr
406msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · inferno, 24 Jun
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 3 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 61% over 23anubisWeakest map · 0% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2314961%0.02
infernoA2112957%0.05
dust2B21101148%0.02
anubisD100100%-0.01
nukeB84450%-0.00
cacheB63350%0.04
ancientB63350%0.01
vertigo31233%-0.02
overpass2020%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,031Lifetime kills
0.87K/D
3,000Matches
45.8%Match win rate
50.4%Headshot %
0.1%Shot accuracy
10,753MVPs
1,751Hours (in match)
2,252Bombs planted
1,840Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4726,573
AWP12,302
MP91,543
MAC-101,303
SSG 081,193

Lifetime map wins

5,427dust2
3,484nuke
2,583inferno
886vertigo
490train
12office
4ar_shoots
1ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,305Matches
50%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
79.5ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage38154%1.1616.4
Dust227549%1.1216.7
Ancient16946%1.1517.3
Anubis16551%1.1918.1
Inferno13547%1.0615.8
Nuke9754%1.1617.6
Overpass3441%1.0117.9
Cache2638%1.0415.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.1%Spray accuracy
88.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
584msReaction time
39.8%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.43Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
5.13HE damage / grenade
6.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.427 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.8149% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0729%15 Sept
cache8–130.0216%13 Sept
nuke9–20.1312%11 Sept
anubis6–130.0922%11 Sept
cache13–100.0916%10 Sept
mirage8–130.1820%10 Sept
inferno3–9-0.0717%10 Sept
inferno9–40.1130%10 Sept
nuke6–130.0221%9 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0719%25 Aug
mirage13–40.0728%25 Aug
dust213–90.0425%21 Aug
dust210–130.0214%20 Aug
dust24–12-0.0310%20 Aug
dust24–130.0329%20 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0423%6 Aug
inferno13–16-0.0510%5 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0613%4 Aug
anubis10–130.0224%4 Aug
ancient13–40.0722%2 Aug
nuke13–50.0417%2 Aug
inferno9–20.0622%1 Aug
mirage12–120.0818%1 Aug
dust211–7-0.0429%1 Aug
ancient14–160.0113%28 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0330%23 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0318%21 Jul
dust26–130.0221%20 Jul
ancient19–16-0.0020%20 Jul
anubis6–130.0524%19 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0530%17 Jul
nuke9–130.0214%17 Jul
anubis14–160.0018%16 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0317%15 Jul
dust213–80.0819%15 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0613%14 Jul
dust210–130.0128%13 Jul
cache13–40.0524%13 Jul
inferno9–40.0119%13 Jul
inferno8–80.0622%13 Jul
mirage13–110.0420%13 Jul
vertigo9–40.1322%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0233%10 Jul
cache15–19-0.0213%9 Jul
overpass3–9-0.0916%2 Jul
cache13–100.1125%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0226%1 Jul
mirage13–20.0423%1 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0229%30 Jun
inferno9–70.0219%28 Jun
inferno9–40.1811%27 Jun
inferno9–70.0833%27 Jun
inferno9–50.1219%27 Jun
mirage13–100.1018%27 Jun
inferno9–60.0340%27 Jun
inferno8–80.0026%26 Jun
inferno9–30.1221%26 Jun
inferno9–30.1123%26 Jun
inferno5–9-0.0510%24 Jun
inferno7–90.2047%23 Jun
nuke3–9-0.1318%23 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0314%23 Jun
dust213–20.0516%23 Jun
dust219–170.0224%17 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0314%16 Jun
dust213–110.0635%11 Jun
dust26–130.0826%11 Jun
dust23–13-0.0419%9 Jun
vertigo5–9-0.0731%5 Jun
mirage7–130.0415%5 Jun
vertigo1–9-0.1219%3 Jun
mirage13–10.0531%3 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0045%1 Jun
inferno9–30.1229%1 Jun
mirage13–30.0427%1 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0723%31 May
ancient16–120.0522%31 May
inferno8–13-0.0621%31 May
mirage9–13-0.0211%30 May
dust213–10-0.0519%28 May
cache7–130.0028%28 May
dust22–13-0.0217%26 May
mirage5–13-0.0531%16 May
mirage13–7-0.0218%10 May
nuke13–9-0.0524%10 May
dust213–60.1024%9 May
mirage8–130.019%3 May
nuke13–10-0.0234%28 Apr
dust213–50.0350%27 Apr
dust24–13-0.0827%27 Apr
inferno10–130.0922%26 Apr
overpass8–13-0.0323%24 Apr
inferno13–90.0419%23 Apr
dust213–100.0321%23 Apr
mirage13–50.0938%19 Apr
dust211–130.1229%18 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0412%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0753%16 Apr
dust211–13-0.0320%11 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0942%8 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →