papYflasH

papYflasH — CS2 Stats

DE76561199693236483[U:1:1732970755]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,697Tracked matches52%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,460Hours in CS22Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating6,527Light Blue band · top ~71.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,527 -1,190 5 Sept – 4 Oct · 19 days played
6,3237,777peak 7,7775 Sept4 Oct
7,777Peak Premier in tracked matches
24Days played since 2026-09-05

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,250 below peak (7,777)
  • -1,190 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 — 3,473 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches78——
Win rate55%——
K/D1.07——
Headshot %39%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 11 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate41.7%41.8%42.7%1.0% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.850.980.990.14 short
Match win rate45.8%43.3%43.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGpapYflasHFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER6,527 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58
Positioning38
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–49–1Last 10050%Win rateWTWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.5pp headshot accuracy · −5ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–1–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.8
Utility5.3
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 595ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8
Positioning3.8
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels0.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms+23ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.6% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–5 · debris, 11 Sept →
28%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 20 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · office, 6 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 20 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
13–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 12dust2Weakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2718–967%-0.00
dust2D195–1426%-0.02
nukeC166–1038%-0.01
anubisS129–375%0.03
infernoC83–538%0.00
ancient—44–0100%0.02
train—42–250%-0.01
cache—41–325%-0.01
office—31–233%-0.02
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
shelter—10–10%0.05
debris—11–0100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

23,761Lifetime kills
0.85K/D
1,933Matches
45.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
41.7%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,953MVPs
744Hours (in match)
3,102Bombs planted
486Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,437dust2
2,443inferno
2,035nuke
795train
722vertigo
320office
40italy
5ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

177Matches
48%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
69.9ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4762%1.0815.2
Dust24533%0.9013.4
Anubis2361%0.9314.0
Nuke1942%1.0915.0
Inferno1839%1.0814.8
Cache1650%0.719.4
Ancient729%0.7713.7
Overpass2100%1.0819.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.5%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
78.8%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
595msReaction time
26.5%T opening success
32.2%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
10.30HE damage / grenade
8.73Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.4567% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.5414% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–11-0.0211%11 Oct →
vertigo12–12-0.0312%11 Oct →
train13–30.0511%11 Oct →
train5–13-0.0425%9 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0710%4 Oct →
dust22–13-0.019%4 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0514%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0120%4 Oct →
dust222–20-0.019%4 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0313%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0112%4 Oct →
dust23–13-0.029%3 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0324%3 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0215%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.0113%3 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0714%3 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0514%3 Oct →
shelter10–130.0515%3 Oct →
office13–80.036%3 Oct →
inferno13–90.1319%1 Oct →
cache1–13-0.0122%1 Oct →
cache4–13-0.043%1 Oct →
nuke7–130.0418%30 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0318%30 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0113%28 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0213%28 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0114%28 Sept →
ancient13–30.0714%28 Sept →
mirage13–110.039%26 Sept →
dust219–22-0.0112%26 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.079%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0817%26 Sept →
ancient13–70.0615%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.0715%25 Sept →
inferno9–130.0315%25 Sept →
cache13–60.015%25 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0319%25 Sept →
nuke11–130.019%25 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0620%24 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0114%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.005%24 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.040%23 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.1010%23 Sept →
dust29–13-0.079%22 Sept →
dust213–70.025%22 Sept →
inferno16–19-0.0311%22 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0210%22 Sept →
mirage16–140.034%21 Sept →
mirage13–50.027%21 Sept →
inferno13–50.009%21 Sept →
mirage22–20-0.0110%20 Sept →
mirage13–10.0221%20 Sept →
mirage13–100.0713%20 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0114%20 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0222%20 Sept →
anubis6–130.028%20 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0328%20 Sept →
nuke15–190.0615%19 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0122%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.1214%19 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.019%19 Sept →
dust213–110.0116%19 Sept →
anubis13–110.0212%19 Sept →
mirage13–70.0316%18 Sept →
mirage9–130.0122%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.1117%18 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0318%18 Sept →
mirage16–120.0010%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.1018%17 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0218%17 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0417%17 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.007%17 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.009%17 Sept →
nuke8–130.023%17 Sept →
nuke13–50.0410%12 Sept →
mirage13–60.0217%12 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.027%12 Sept →
anubis9–130.0211%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.028%11 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.0410%11 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0113%11 Sept →
nuke5–9-0.1812%11 Sept →
debris9–50.1712%11 Sept →
mirage11–130.0211%10 Sept →
nuke16–140.0210%8 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0111%8 Sept →
cache4–12-0.0020%8 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0311%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.005%7 Sept →
anubis13–80.0316%7 Sept →
train13–10-0.0118%7 Sept →
train0–5-0.030%7 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0513%7 Sept →
dust28–130.0416%6 Sept →
office4–13-0.0813%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.0111%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0321%6 Sept →
anubis13–110.0617%5 Sept →
anubis13–6-0.0121%5 Sept →
office11–130.0024%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.