suggy

suggy — CS2 Stats

76561199680989643[U:1:1720723915]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

645Tracked matches69%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Oct 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+1Tracked matches · now 645
0.0ppWin rate · 69.0% → 69.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,801 +0 1 Sept – 11 Sept · 3 days played
14,80114,801peak 14,8011 Sept11 Sept
14,801Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsuggyFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim27
Positioning27
Utility12

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY75–22–3Last 10075%Win rateWLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −7.6pp headshot accuracy · +51ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 5%
  • Avg reaction 739ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 718ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim2.7
Utility1.2
Positioning2.7
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch1.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 695ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.7
Positioning2.7
Utility1.2
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.04
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time702ms+174ms
first ⅓ avg 528ms → last ⅓ avg 702ms
Headshot accuracy11.1%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 10.4% → last ⅓ avg 11.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.26Best match rating · 9–2 · inferno, 1 Sept →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 15 Sept →
258msFastest reaction time · 9–3 · inferno, 1 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 14 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

12Longest win streak
7–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 63% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2418–675%-0.04
mirageS1814–478%-0.01
infernoS1711–665%0.01
dust2S109–190%0.01
vertigoS109–190%-0.01
anubisA85–363%-0.02
officeS66–0100%-0.02
cache—20–20%-0.05
train—21–150%-0.07
poseidon—21–150%0.05
shelter—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (63% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

70Matches
53%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
62.2ADR
32%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2065%0.7812.4
Anubis1553%0.7211.7
Nuke1553%0.7711.5
Dust21030%0.7711.6
Inferno450%0.959.3
Ancient475%0.6810.0
Cache10%0.386.0
Vertigo10%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.4%Headshot accuracy
30.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.8%Spray accuracy
70.1%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
695msReaction time
30.6%T opening success
21.0%CT opening success
0.13Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
4.44HE damage / grenade
1.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.4382% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.1325 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.6338% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–80.050%23 Oct →
cache3–13-0.097%21 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.025%14 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.066%14 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.049%14 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.0613%7 Oct →
nuke5–1-0.0117%7 Oct →
train5–13-0.036%7 Oct →
dust213–6-0.039%7 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.104%6 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0615%5 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0717%3 Oct →
inferno2–9-0.157%3 Oct →
office13–7-0.0519%2 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.0222%1 Oct →
dust213–40.0411%1 Oct →
nuke13–5-0.027%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.0613%30 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.049%30 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0231%29 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0410%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.1012%29 Sept →
vertigo13–2-0.030%29 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.067%28 Sept →
mirage13–10.1312%28 Sept →
mirage13–2-0.010%27 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.0519%27 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0624%27 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0611%27 Sept →
nuke8–8-0.116%27 Sept →
office13–9-0.0013%26 Sept →
anubis13–3-0.0923%26 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.095%26 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.086%24 Sept →
vertigo13–10-0.009%23 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.1211%23 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.076%23 Sept →
nuke13–20.0213%22 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0819%22 Sept →
dust213–1-0.0215%21 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0426%20 Sept →
shelter13–11-0.037%20 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0724%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.0117%18 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0116%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.0514%17 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0410%17 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0213%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0712%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0313%16 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.056%16 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0721%15 Sept →
dust213–20.0435%15 Sept →
dust213–40.0223%15 Sept →
mirage13–30.0312%14 Sept →
inferno13–00.000%14 Sept →
dust213–7-0.019%14 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0121%14 Sept →
dust213–60.018%14 Sept →
mirage13–20.0622%13 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.023%13 Sept →
vertigo13–10.1726%13 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0211%10 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0414%10 Sept →
inferno13–60.1510%10 Sept →
inferno9–50.1512%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.0910%9 Sept →
inferno13–40.017%9 Sept →
nuke13–0-0.070%8 Sept →
train13–6-0.1019%8 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.018%7 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0116%7 Sept →
mirage11–130.0110%6 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.1210%6 Sept →
office13–100.0120%5 Sept →
nuke13–7-0.016%5 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0815%5 Sept →
dust213–30.0710%5 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0110%5 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.028%5 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0011%4 Sept →
nuke13–20.039%4 Sept →
nuke13–100.0613%4 Sept →
office13–50.0313%4 Sept →
poseidon9–50.073%4 Sept →
mirage13–1-0.030%2 Sept →
office13–8-0.0625%2 Sept →
office13–2-0.027%2 Sept →
nuke6–13-0.027%2 Sept →
poseidon7–90.0220%2 Sept →
inferno9–30.0621%2 Sept →
inferno9–30.1611%2 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0413%1 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.090%1 Sept →
inferno9–30.0314%1 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.100%1 Sept →
inferno9–20.2613%1 Sept →
inferno9–2-0.028%1 Sept →
vertigo9–6-0.035%1 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.049%1 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches12-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.