arigato

arigato — CS2 Stats

RO76561199222788622[U:1:1262522894]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

758Tracked matches62%Win rate2025Tracked since
1,122Hours in CS0Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#8670 of 261510 tracked
FaceitLevel 3 · 718 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,682 +1,683 3 Sept – 17 Oct · 20 days played
24,88326,682peak 26,6823 Sept17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 718 +0 3 Sept – 15 Oct · 5 observations
718718peak 7183 Sept15 Oct
26,682Peak Premier in tracked matches
718Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-09-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 718
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 33 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches11——
Win rate73%——
K/D1.36——
Headshot %35%——

Measured 15 Oct 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate44.9%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy5.7%12.2%11.2%5.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.890.980.990.10 short
Match win rate44.4%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGarigatoFACEITLevel 3 · 718 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO718csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning58
Utility15

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT66–31–3Last 10066%Win rateLLWWWWWWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.08 avg rating · −1.0pp headshot accuracy · −163ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 378ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 480ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility1.5
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch1.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning5.8
Utility1.5
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels5.7
Win Impact9.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time477ms+24ms
first ⅓ avg 453ms → last ⅓ avg 477ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 13–3 · mirage, 27 Sept →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 6–0 · ancient, 13 Sept →
172msFastest reaction time · 0–13 · mirage, 20 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 18 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

16Longest win streak
L2Current streak
8–2In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 86% over 7mirageWeakest map · 57% over 28
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2816–1257%0.05
nukeS2217–577%0.06
anubisA138–562%0.04
dust2A138–562%0.06
infernoA74–357%0.07
vertigoS76–186%0.09
ancient—42–250%0.10
cache—21–150%0.04
office—22–0100%0.15
shelter—11–0100%0.10
train—11–0100%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 28). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

33,546Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,143Matches
44.4%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
44.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 3 players
5.7%Shot accuracy
5,422MVPs
653Hours (in match)
638Bombs planted
328Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

3,172dust2
2,291nuke
1,974inferno
384vertigo
378office
236train
35lake
17safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

183Matches
48%Win rate
0.87Avg K/D
77.4ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5553%0.8514.6
Nuke3238%0.9816.6
Dust23145%0.9316.8
Anubis2759%0.8514.0
Inferno1638%0.8213.7
Ancient1145%0.6511.2
Train560%0.9014.8
Overpass3100%1.1517.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
37.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
75.9%Counter-strafing
6.5°Preaim
497msReaction time
51.3%T opening success
54.4%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
11.09HE damage / grenade
1.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2674 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke5–130.1312%25 Oct →
inferno8–130.0520%25 Oct →
mirage13–50.0814%25 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.038%25 Oct →
anubis13–90.0916%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0020%17 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0919%17 Oct →
nuke13–30.0421%17 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.039%15 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0615%14 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0831%14 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0932%14 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0418%13 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0910%13 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.090%11 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.0825%11 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0511%10 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0719%10 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.090%10 Oct →
mirage12–30.0717%10 Oct →
dust213–10.1033%8 Oct →
cache13–10.0328%8 Oct →
vertigo9–130.0720%7 Oct →
nuke5–10.2417%7 Oct →
mirage12–70.0617%7 Oct →
dust25–130.0422%3 Oct →
nuke13–50.095%1 Oct →
dust213–40.1227%1 Oct →
nuke13–50.0818%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.1017%30 Sept →
mirage12–120.0727%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.1415%29 Sept →
nuke13–110.0823%29 Sept →
nuke10–130.1024%29 Sept →
vertigo13–20.0223%29 Sept →
anubis6–130.1532%27 Sept →
mirage13–20.1826%27 Sept →
vertigo13–40.1422%27 Sept →
mirage13–30.2430%27 Sept →
nuke13–100.1218%27 Sept →
office13–90.1625%26 Sept →
anubis13–30.0211%26 Sept →
mirage13–50.1823%26 Sept →
mirage12–120.0826%25 Sept →
dust29–10.0529%25 Sept →
mirage1–13-0.0232%25 Sept →
dust28–130.1616%24 Sept →
cache3–130.0621%24 Sept →
nuke13–40.1215%24 Sept →
ancient10–130.1327%23 Sept →
nuke13–20.1432%22 Sept →
vertigo13–110.0218%22 Sept →
ancient13–110.1615%22 Sept →
mirage2–130.1740%22 Sept →
mirage6–130.0713%20 Sept →
shelter13–110.1012%20 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.100%20 Sept →
dust210–130.0913%20 Sept →
anubis13–70.0617%18 Sept →
nuke13–70.0219%18 Sept →
inferno13–00.085%18 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0520%18 Sept →
mirage13–20.0230%18 Sept →
mirage5–130.0225%18 Sept →
mirage13–100.1417%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.1619%18 Sept →
anubis13–40.1818%17 Sept →
vertigo13–10.0838%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.1117%16 Sept →
mirage13–30.0717%16 Sept →
inferno13–110.1319%15 Sept →
dust213–20.0423%15 Sept →
dust213–40.0729%15 Sept →
mirage13–30.1310%14 Sept →
inferno13–00.0723%14 Sept →
dust213–70.1125%14 Sept →
nuke13–110.1924%14 Sept →
mirage13–20.067%13 Sept →
nuke13–40.0528%13 Sept →
vertigo13–10.1617%13 Sept →
mirage14–160.1015%13 Sept →
ancient6–00.1642%13 Sept →
dust25–130.0430%12 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.057%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0514%12 Sept →
mirage13–100.0117%12 Sept →
vertigo13–10.1414%10 Sept →
inferno7–130.0619%10 Sept →
mirage13–60.1115%9 Sept →
nuke13–00.1628%8 Sept →
train13–60.1026%8 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.049%7 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.037%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0113%6 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0312%6 Sept →
office13–100.1315%5 Sept →
nuke13–70.0812%5 Sept →
nuke13–100.0115%5 Sept →
dust213–3-0.0321%5 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0110%5 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches16-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.