Estriper

Estriper — CS2 Stats

PL76561199645679901[U:1:1685414173]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

192Tracked matches60%Win rate2025Tracked since
869Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,532Blue band · top ~46.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Nov 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,532 +1,597 22 Sept – 11 Nov · 8 days played
9,93511,532peak 11,53222 Sept11 Nov
11,532Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-09-13

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 11,532
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,468 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-24

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate55.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.0%13.2%13.2% short
Kill/death ratio0.801.061.070.27 short
Match win rate50.4%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEstriperFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER11,532 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning70
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–43Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 637ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.2
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch4.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 65% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning7.0
Utility5.2
Mechanics5.4
Opening Duels7.6
Win Impact8.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time555ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 514ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy19.6%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–4 · anubis, 29 Sept →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · vertigo, 21 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · ancient, 19 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 27 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 8ancientWeakest map · 47% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA3017–1357%0.02
dust2A1911–858%0.03
ancientB157–847%0.01
infernoA127–558%0.02
anubisA85–363%0.05
cacheA74–357%0.03
nukeA53–260%-0.03
vertigo—43–175%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

4,516Lifetime kills
0.80K/D
242Matches
50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
55.5%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 8 players
0.0%Shot accuracy
569MVPs
111Hours (in match)
262Bombs planted
56Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

572dust2
204inferno
142nuke
99vertigo
27train
10office
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

128Matches
57%Win rate
1.20Avg K/D
81.2ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4060%1.2116.7
Ancient2250%1.1415.6
Dust22250%1.1516.0
Inferno1354%1.1916.6
Anubis1173%1.3616.3
Cache944%1.1119.0
Vertigo683%1.4415.2
Nuke560%1.2421.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.0%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
74.2%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
571msReaction time
65.0%T opening success
56.1%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
8.20HE damage / grenade
4.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0619%11 Nov →
mirage13–80.0820%2 Nov →
dust213–100.0224%28 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0723%28 Oct →
anubis13–30.1219%28 Oct →
ancient13–60.027%27 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0822%27 Oct →
dust28–130.0525%27 Oct →
cache13–10.0124%27 Oct →
mirage13–30.0925%25 Oct →
anubis14–160.029%25 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0317%25 Oct →
mirage8–130.1218%25 Oct →
mirage3–130.0224%25 Oct →
dust213–40.1940%24 Oct →
dust213–10.0831%24 Oct →
dust213–40.1328%24 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0224%24 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0518%24 Oct →
dust211–130.0413%23 Oct →
ancient16–19-0.0322%23 Oct →
inferno13–110.0530%19 Oct →
cache13–80.0423%19 Oct →
ancient13–60.028%19 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0519%19 Oct →
anubis16–12-0.0211%13 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0210%13 Oct →
ancient22–190.0518%11 Oct →
dust213–90.0318%8 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0022%8 Oct →
inferno13–100.0417%6 Oct →
cache7–130.0118%6 Oct →
nuke7–9-0.220%6 Oct →
dust213–70.0119%3 Oct →
dust213–30.0719%3 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0523%3 Oct →
mirage13–30.0313%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0023%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.0719%1 Oct →
mirage13–60.0418%1 Oct →
mirage13–30.0323%1 Oct →
nuke16–12-0.0517%1 Oct →
inferno13–160.0523%1 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0124%1 Oct →
dust25–130.0226%1 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0413%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0119%30 Sept →
ancient13–90.0530%30 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0018%30 Sept →
dust216–140.0118%30 Sept →
mirage22–19-0.0216%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0329%29 Sept →
anubis13–40.2226%29 Sept →
mirage13–60.1117%29 Sept →
cache13–90.1030%29 Sept →
ancient9–130.0122%29 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0426%22 Sept →
mirage19–170.0121%22 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0115%22 Sept →
ancient9–130.0025%22 Sept →
cache6–130.0520%21 Sept →
dust213–70.0224%21 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.0819%21 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0310%21 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0120%21 Sept →
cache10–130.0421%21 Sept →
vertigo5–13-0.0741%21 Sept →
inferno13–70.0120%20 Sept →
anubis13–40.0110%20 Sept →
mirage5–130.0524%20 Sept →
mirage13–80.088%20 Sept →
dust210–130.0035%20 Sept →
ancient13–80.0512%19 Sept →
ancient10–130.0329%19 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0515%19 Sept →
inferno13–90.0921%19 Sept →
cache16–14-0.0320%19 Sept →
mirage9–130.0228%18 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0226%18 Sept →
nuke16–130.0423%18 Sept →
anubis11–130.0417%18 Sept →
nuke13–50.0325%17 Sept →
mirage13–50.0525%17 Sept →
vertigo13–30.0521%16 Sept →
mirage13–100.0325%16 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0431%16 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0113%16 Sept →
inferno13–50.0724%15 Sept →
vertigo13–60.0617%14 Sept →
ancient13–20.0724%14 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0121%14 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0415%14 Sept →
inferno13–100.0521%13 Sept →
vertigo13–70.0420%13 Sept →
nuke10–130.0537%13 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0111%13 Sept →
anubis13–50.0620%13 Sept →
mirage7–130.0112%13 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0023%13 Sept →
dust213–30.0932%13 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.